Thanks Dar. That is exactly what I did. I guess I was expecting the effective
working rect of a screen to be the area within which a window could be fully
displayed accounting for all the accoutrements. (That's French you know. :-)
Bob S
> On Jun 26, 2019, at 15:04 , Dar Scott Consulting via u
The effective rect of the stack is the absolute rect of the window including
the title, all of the borders (where there are any) and and the decorations.
Thus, the top will be (say) 22 pixels less than the rect of the stack.
You can subtract the upper left of the working screenRect from either t
So now my only beef is that with a MacOS window that has a custom menu that is
set as the system menu, the effective rect of the stack does not take into
account the MacOS Menu Bar.
Bob S
> On Jun 26, 2019, at 11:19 , Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> OK I figured it out. I have to
On 6/26/2019 1:41 PM, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
So I am dealing with the rects of stacks vs. the rects of screens, and now I
see what the issues people have had are all about. I have a window whose bottom
is partially below the screen it is on. But item 4 of the rect of the stack is
OK I figured it out. I have to use the EFFECTIVE rect of the stack and the
effective working rect of the screen.
Bob S
> On Jun 26, 2019, at 11:15 , Bob Sneidar via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> That is EXACTLY the question I was asking! :-)
>
> Bob S
>
>
>> On Jun 26, 2019, at 10:48 , Alex
> Craig wrote:
> Probably a brain typo...
What an excellent wording!
___
use-livecode mailing list
use-livecode@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/l
That is EXACTLY the question I was asking! :-)
Bob S
> On Jun 26, 2019, at 10:48 , Alex Tweedly via use-livecode
> wrote:
>
> I'm lost . how is
>
> 1198 (item 4 of the stackrect)
>
> less than
>
> 1080 (item 4 of the screenrect) ?
___
use-
1:48 pm
Subject: Re: Rects Revisted
I'm lost . how is
1198 (item 4 of the stackrect)
less than
1080 (item 4 of the screenrect) ?
On 26/06/2019 18:41, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
> So I am dealing with the rects of stacks vs. the rects of screens, and now I
> see what
I'm lost . how is
1198 (item 4 of the stackrect)
less than
1080 (item 4 of the screenrect) ?
On 26/06/2019 18:41, Bob Sneidar via use-livecode wrote:
So I am dealing with the rects of stacks vs. the rects of screens, and now I
see what the issues people have had are all about. I have a
So I am dealing with the rects of stacks vs. the rects of screens, and now I
see what the issues people have had are all about. I have a window whose bottom
is partially below the screen it is on. But item 4 of the rect of the stack is
being reported as being LESS than item 4 of the screenRect!
10 matches
Mail list logo