On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 10:44 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 10:07 PM, Mark Brownell wrote:
f = S1[a] + S2[b]
f = bitXor( f , S3[c] )
f = bitAnd( f + S4[d], -1 )
There are a couple problems, I think the same functionality is the
cause though.
From TD: the la
--snip--
Hmmm. With the new /* and */ comments, some doors open for interesting
documentation in scripts. We may want the script editor to not colorize lines
between such lines or to make that an option.
You have opened an whole new way for me to think about scripts.
Dar Scott
>
Fo
On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 10:07 PM, Mark Brownell wrote:
f = S1[a] + S2[b]
f = bitXor( f , S3[c] )
f = bitAnd( f + S4[d], -1 )
There are a couple problems, I think the same functionality is the
cause though.
On the last line is the negative number -1. It is increased to 0 in a
b
Sarah wrote:
>> Survey: How many of you use text styles in your code?
> Not me!
>>
>>> Yesterday my "potential corrupt stack paranoia" got the better of me
>>> and I
>>> spent a while doing a lot of "copy-paste" between the existing stack
>>> and a new
>>> one. I ended up with the same size, of
On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 10:29 PM, Mark Brownell wrote:
Dar wrote:
put ( xL bitAnd -16777216 ) / 16777216 into zap
4278190080 not -16777216.
(Soap box diatribe about our C heritage deleted.)
There must be a relationship for these two numbers being treated the
same. How about some kind of
WANTED: I'm seeking a skilled RR programmer with the patience
to help a rather dim Rev newbie (me) complete a project.
The project in question will require experience with Valentina
and RR 2. I'm working on a Windows XP PC (out of necessity),
so the person should have some experience with PC p
Dar wrote:
put ( xL bitAnd -16777216 ) / 16777216 into zap
4278190080 not -16777216.
(Soap box diatribe about our C heritage deleted.)
There must be a relationship for these two numbers being treated the same. How about some kind of truncation procedure that worked in Director but not Revolu
On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 07:07 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
The last four lines look like the first steps of the F function in
your Feistel network (more, crypto jargon, folks, not that I speak > it):
a = bitAnd( bitAnd( xL, -16777216 ) / 16777216, 255 ) + 1
b = ( bitAnd( xL, 16711680 ) / 65536
On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 08:58 PM, Mark Brownell wrote:
put ( xL bitAnd -16777216 ) / 16777216 into zap
4278190080 not -16777216.
(Soap box diatribe about our C heritage deleted.)
Dar Scott
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:
On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 05:55 PM, Mark Brownell wrote:
Here is another possible optimization point.
What can you and Rev do with this:
xL = 0
xL = bitXor( xL, bfP2[i] ) -- bfP2[i] = 1920723274
a = bitAnd( bitAnd( xL, -16777216 ) / 16777216, 255 ) + 1
b = ( bitAnd( xL, 16711680 ) / 65536
On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 06:55 PM, Mark Brownell wrote:
You can handle these files (or send the data) as you would any binary
data. If you need printable ASCII of binary files or strings, then
run them through base64 (see TD). If you need to store encrypted
data in stacks, consider custom
On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 03:54 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 03:48 PM, Mark Brownell wrote:
If I used zeros to pad then I can strip them based on the number of chars in the original, a function may be used to strip these extra characters from the end of the string. For b
Ok... This one is deep, deep down in RR and I don¹t blame anyone that they
haven¹t found this problem, but it is annoying :-(
I have one main program which looks into a folder named ³modules² for files
to load into a list.
These modules are .rev files containing one group with a lot of controls,
s
I can't imagine why somebody would want stylized text in the script
(except colors...they seem to be helpful).
Actually every now and then I like to pretty things up a bit and using bold
is a really good way to make something stand out. I haven't yet used a
different font.
I do have the "Remove
Dar Scott wrote:
>
> On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 12:49 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
>
>> Survey: How many of you use text styles in your code?
>
> In the script? Only what Revolution provides.
I was referring just to scripts, and looking only at user-driven styles (as
opposed to colorizing whi
I don't, in fact, as I mentioned in another post stuff pasted into scripts
keeping it's format drive me batty.
That said, I do use colorizing sometimes when tracking down problems.
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Gaskin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June
On Sunday, June 22, 2003, at 12:49 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Survey: How many of you use text styles in your code?
In the script? Only what Revolution provides.
In my stacks? I use "textiles" everywhere.
Dar Scott
___
use-revolution mailing list
[E
rand valentine wrote:
> is there an easy way to clone a substack _within_ a main stack? i can't
> seem to find one. thanks!
After cloning a stack, set its filename to that of the mainstack.
--
Richard Gaskin
Fourth World Media Corporation
Developer of WebMerge 2.2: Publish any database on a
Thanks for the explanantion Ken.
Shame about this as the Numlock state can be quite important for laptop apps. Maybe the RunRev guys may like to think about it.
In the meantime, I think I'll just go for an answer box and let the user check!
Thanks for the help.
Steve
From: "Ken Ray" <[EMAIL
T. R. Ponn wrote:
> I do have the "Remove Revolution UI custom properties" checked. Is this what
> you're suggesting? What is the reason behind all the html?
Survey: How many of you use text styles in your code?
> Yesterday my "potential corrupt stack paranoia" got the better of me and I
> sp
Op 22-06-2003 om 12:02 -0400 meldde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ons het volgende:
use-revolution digest, Vol 1 #1518 - 3 msgs
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 11:01:58 -0400
Subject: Re: Stack Size Bloat?
From: Marian Petrides <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using Jan Ble
On Saturday, June 21, 2003, at 04:09 PM, erik hansen wrote:
google "IDE" =>
Integrated Development Enterprise
Institute of Developing Economies
Nancy Ide
Professor and Chair
Department of Computer Science
Vassar College
Google is not my first choice for searches like this. See
http://www.webope
On Friday, June 20, 2003, at 07:05 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Is there any way to make a backup of a stack without shifting to the
backed up stack as the working stack -- i.e., when you do "save as..."
the
stack you save to becomes the main stack -- but i just want to be able
to
archive my
Using Jan Bleeker's "Export Scripts" stack
Where can I find this stack> ... it sounds quite useful.
TIA,
Marian
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Monte,
I do have the "Remove Revolution UI custom properties" checked. Is this
what you're suggesting? What is the reason behind all the html? I have
noticed when I open the stack with a text editor, there is a LOT of it...and
then farther into the file, it appears that all of my scripting
Erik,
Yes, as a matter of fact, I do...but it usually only amounts to a few hundred
bytes at most. I wouldn't have noticed them if I hadn't tried that "Export
Scripts" stack. When I see them, I delete them right away. Are these two
issues related somehow...maybe symptomatic of some bug?
Be
It is very frustrating, but a nice workaround is "paste as comment" and then
remove the comments...
Ton Kuypers
> From: Martin Baxter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 08:51:10 +0100
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Font's in pasted scripts
>
> Yes
Ken,
sure it helps!
I am trying your suggestions now.
Have a nice weekend
Ubaldo
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Yes, Edwin, you are not alone...
I too have been seeing some really ugly results from pasting into scripts,
and haven't found a simple way to fix it.
The script looks awful because the pretty-printing (aka indentation) loses
contact with reality, (because of the character widths of the different
t
29 matches
Mail list logo
