On 10/22/06, Andre Garzia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Friends,
when using a try/catch block to pick errors, I usually see stuff like
this in the errorStatement:
91,81,2
77,81,2
223,81,1
241,81,1,getCountriesForm
353,0,0,stack "script"
219,31,36,getCountriesForm
499,31,1
253,27,1
Does anyone kno
Friends,
when using a try/catch block to pick errors, I usually see stuff like
this in the errorStatement:
91,81,2
77,81,2
223,81,1
241,81,1,getCountriesForm
353,0,0,stack "script"
219,31,36,getCountriesForm
499,31,1
253,27,1
Does anyone know how to make sense of it? For example I know that
Sivakatirswami-
Saturday, October 21, 2006, 2:58:48 AM, you wrote:
> Can anyone confirm this perception? I would love to be proved wrong: it
> goes to strategy, a) depend on a Google search link on your site, for
> your own site, b) set up you own search engine (HT DIG). c) pay Google
> the bi
Try this:
put "#!/bin/sh" & cr into tScript
put "pw=" & quote & tPass & quote & cr after tScript
put "echo $pw | sudo -S - postgres" & cr after tScript
put "/usr/local/bin/postmaster -D /usr/local/pgsql/data -i" & cr after tScript
put shell(tScript) into tCheck -- do the command & get the result
On 10/22/06, Marian Petrides <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
3 cheers for Heather, the best List-Mum in the world!!
Marian
Hear, hear :-)
Sarah
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscr
And as for Flash - you don"t need the development environment. You can
download one of the various flash files that will play the slide show and
just use it - you can even use open source (Lazlo) free server side Flash
generation if you really needed to - but for most of your needs I"d guess
you c
Hi Bruce,
The docs may be considered wrong in several ways, where Mac OS X is
concerned. RevDeleteFolder doesn't use AppleScript but the shell. It
uses the rm shell command, which deletes files and folders and
doesn't move them to the trash. To move a folder to the trash, you
might use th
3 cheers for Heather, the best List-Mum in the world!!
Marian
On Oct 21, 2006, at 8:32 AM, Richmond Mathewson wrote:
Well that really is the nub of the matter -
some of us (well, at least me) need to be noticed by
Heather Nagey occasionally!
Seriously, though:-
I, for one, am extremely hap
On 21 Oct 2006, at 23:04, Dar Scott wrote:
On Oct 21, 2006, at 3:19 PM, kee nethery wrote:
The advantage of a file is that you can have the master stack look
in all the files sometime after it launches all the tests (and
after they really should be finished) to see which tests suites
On Oct 21, 2006, at 3:19 PM, kee nethery wrote:
Rather than callbacks, I'd probably go for things being called
from the openstack handler with results being written to a text
file with the same name as the test stack. That way you just
launch each stack and don't have to worry too much abo
Mark Swindell wrote:
I have a global variable gTimedTest
Depending on whether it is empty or not I want to do different things in
a handler
How do I write this to make it happen with a switch control structure?
switch gTimedTest
case empty
stuff
break
case not empty
other stuff
break
end
On 10/22/06, Mark Swindell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a global variable gTimedTest
Depending on whether it is empty or not I want to do different things
in a handler
How do I write this to make it happen with a switch control structure?
switch gTimedTest
case empty
stuff
break
case no
I have a global variable gTimedTest
Depending on whether it is empty or not I want to do different things
in a handler
How do I write this to make it happen with a switch control structure?
switch gTimedTest
case empty
stuff
break
case not empty
other stuff
break
end switch
The above doe
On Oct 21, 2006, at 11:54 AM, Dar Scott wrote:
On Oct 20, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Ian Wood wrote:
Rather than callbacks, I'd probably go for things being called
from the openstack handler with results being written to a text
file with the same name as the test stack. That way you just
launch
Dar,
> Oh, sorry, I got confused about the paper part. I think "folded" is what
> did it.
The "pressed and folded" comment was a reference to laundry. It's an idiom
often used to indicate something is cleaned and prepared thoughtfully, as a
household service might do.
> According to the pag
Sivakatirswami,
AJAX vs. iframes really depends a lot on your needs, but besides buzz-
word compliance there are some advantages to AJAX:
1) The request is asynchronous, which has the advantages that:
a) You can display your own "loading" messages easily
b) You can manage your own err
OK, that's all very interesting. and I think I understand about half of it.
but
a) given CPU speeds of web servers are increasing
witness: The dual Xeon processor on our managed dedicated server at
ServerPath with 100 Megabit dedicated socket for our box, (no other box
on our same C class n
This is a bit OT, (pushed one of my buttons...) Is it just me that
senses this?: that as Google is getting bigger and bigger I'm seeing
it's indexing of any given asset on the net is getting spottier and
spottier. There is one group of minds that is so entralled with this
behmoth they believe
Dave Herndon wrote:
Mainstack calls substack2 with the modal substack2, show substack2
commands. Substack2 is a bit larger window that pops on top of the
mainstack and rup runs a different query to show a different view of
the same data. Substack2 now calls substack1 with the modal
substack1,
Ehm, I feel some need to correct this.
I have been using LiveStage Pro for many years, and at least as far
as the buttons are concerned, it's just a matter of telling which
images (or movies) you want for each roll over state. Next to that
there are many so called behaviors that can be atta
Andre Garzia wrote:
Friends,
I am using a simple routine on a CGI
lock messages
go stack "alittlemetacardstack.mc"
unlock messages
to open a stack created by metacard on a cgi so that I can pull data out
of it. This file opens fine in the Rev IDE but then opening on the CGI
Engine, the resul
Qscript is what drove me to Revolution. ;-)
LiveStage is an incredibly powerful tool, but the learning curve
makes Rev look like child's play. And Apple's track record recently
with breaking things in each successive release of QuickTime doesn't
help.
Anyway, having worked extensively wit
On Oct 20, 2006, at 8:29 PM, Ian Wood wrote:
Rather than callbacks, I'd probably go for things being called from
the openstack handler with results being written to a text file
with the same name as the test stack. That way you just launch each
stack and don't have to worry too much about
On Oct 20, 2006, at 9:06 PM, Andre Garzia wrote:
do you have accurate timing routines there to share? something that
could be called before and after a test so that we can measure it?
The next release of darzTimer will include the ability to install
darzTimer Library. Maybe I can up the "
On Oct 20, 2006, at 8:15 PM, kee nethery wrote:
How about one master stack that looks in a folder, lists all the
stacks in that folder,
Good idea. I'm thinking that could fill a selection control.
then sends each one a command to execute it's tests,
I am thinking of two methods, one whi
On Oct 21, 2006, at 1:32 AM, Bill Marriott wrote:
Not paper. The reports are provided via a secure web connection.
But yes,
it's a free crash analysis service provided by Microsoft for
Windows XP and
later that would seem to be a valuable way to diagnose program
crashes. Rev
apparently do
> > The core engineering team uses Bugzilla. If they have to spend time
> sifting
> > through other venues that's time they cant spend on fixing and
> > featuring Rev. Engineering also reads the Improve list, but again,
> > there's a limit
> to
> > the amount of time they can spend on that.
>
>
Lynn Fredricks - Worldwide Business Operations - Runtime Revolution, Ltd
wrote:
>>> Runtime doesn't get these reports. The only way to be sure that the
>>> team sees your report is to enter it into Bugzilla. That is the one
>>> and only venue that assures the problem will be noticed.
>>
>> Just an
Object Rendering & Modification Speed Test
Version 1.0
A utility designed to provide you with an interesting interpretation of
the duration of time required for Revolution to create massive numbers
of objects during repeat loops.
- Choose any number of objects to test
- View result in a Revol
Friends,
I am using a simple routine on a CGI
lock messages
go stack "alittlemetacardstack.mc"
unlock messages
to open a stack created by metacard on a cgi so that I can pull data
out of it. This file opens fine in the Rev IDE but then opening on
the CGI Engine, the result becomes "file is
Greg,
No I have not and the Qscript does look very much like javascript so
I can see what you mean.
Tom
On Oct 21, 2006, at 11:10 AM, GregSmith wrote:
Thomas:
LiveStage would be the "premiere" QuickTime authoring environment,
but have
you tried authoring in it? I find it extremely con
Tom,
I want that keynote version!!! :D
The version I used on RevCon didn't even allowed me to export my
transitions, all it did was to create a movie slideshow. Maybe I set
something wrong.
Now one trick question to you pro guys, if we have an interactive
quicktime movie and we put it on
Bruce,
You can always write a text script file to be run by bash and execute
it thru shell, then it would execute all your concatenations in one
pass and free you from the tedious 1024 limit. Maybe depending on
license issues and dependencies, you can extract join.py from that
bundle and
Thomas:
LiveStage would be the "premiere" QuickTime authoring environment, but have
you tried authoring in it? I find it extremely confusing, at best. As far
as I can tell, even the simplest interactivity must be scripted in Qscript,
which looks to me, like another javascript clone. This is gr
Andre,
That is not the case. Keynote does export an Interactive quicktime
movie that supports timings, transitions, buttons, etc. the problem
is that some setting will break this interactivity. It is in the
latest version of keynote, for that matter so is the ability to
export to Flash as
Dear Greg,
Live Stage from Totally Hip Software is supposed to do Rollover's in
Quicktime.
Tom
On Oct 21, 2006, at 10:22 AM, GregSmith wrote:
As far as the simplest solution for authoring in "standalone"
QuickTime
format, whether for web presentation or anything else, given the
ava
Greg,
If I remember correcly, keynote quicktime export just picks your
slides as if they were images and create a movie slideshow, it doesnt
even respect timings and transitions. I didn't used keynote very
much, just used it for RevCon presentation but I think interactivity
is not suppose
Hello group,
A couple of times I and others have asked about a way to combine PDF
files using a RunRev script. I don't recall ever seeing an answer, so
I would like to share the solution that I found.
There is an Automator action under OS X that combines PDFs. Someone
on an Automator mailing
Hello group,
According to the docs, the revDeleteFolder command is supposed to put
the deleted folder in the Trash:
"On Mac OS and OS X systems, the revDeleteFolder command places
the folder in the Trash."
However, on my iMac Core 2 Duo, the folder simply disappears. Nothing
shows in
Okay, who still have Rev 1.1 on a G3 macintosh with 32mb ram and Mac
OS 9?
:-)
Andre
On Oct 21, 2006, at 12:27 PM, kee nethery wrote:
Good idea.
At WWDC the Apple Safari team indicated they use the slowest Mac
that have to run all their regression tests, makes it easier to
compare diffe
Thomas:
I just did a little test run with Keynote, yesterday. All seemed to be
going well, as demonstrated in the "preview" portion of the app, but upon
testing the exported QuickTime movie, the interactivity was broken. Not
only so, but the export process, itself took a lifetime to execute.
T
Greg,
Keynote exports to Interactive Video in QT with some preset format
settings (Full Quality, Large, H.264, 800x600, 24 FPS)(CD-Rom,
Medium, H.264, 400x300, 12 FPS)(Web, Small, H.264, 200x150, 12 FPS)
but if you select Custom under the Formats Pop-up in the Export Drop
down for Quickt
On Oct 20, 2006, at 7:29 PM, Ian Wood wrote:
On 21 Oct 2006, at 03:15, kee nethery wrote:
On Oct 20, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Andre Garzia wrote:
One thing we trylu need is a Suite of Tests that test a rev
distribution for obvious bugs. This little stack could be
executed and it would test thin
As far as the simplest solution for authoring in "standalone" QuickTime
format, whether for web presentation or anything else, given the available
interactivity built into QuickTime, itself - Cleaner 6.5, (for Mac), and, I
believe Cleaner XL, (for Windows) seems to be the ticket. Outrageously
pri
On Oct 19, 2006, at 10:45 AM, Josep M Yepes wrote:
Now I need to read form a excel file. The excel file is pre-
formated with two columns data. It's a price list.
Any tip to aboard the file? I'm developing on Mac OS X, but the
application must be run also on Windows.
I have an applescript a
I've been reading this thread with some trepidation that it would turn into
a war. Thankfully it has been a frank discussion and has served to clear up
several misunderstandings as I read it.
As a casual, semiserious user who is headed toward betting my company on
creating a commercial Rev applic
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Stephen Barncard wrote:
You act like Rev can afford a staff of Beta testers in house all the
time. They don't have the resources of M$ and I imagine the margins
are thin. After seeing the supposedly well supported Hypercard go
down, I'm very grateful Rev even exists for
Well that really is the nub of the matter -
some of us (well, at least me) need to be noticed by
Heather Nagey occasionally!
Seriously, though:-
I, for one, am extremely happy to know that Heather
Nagey is "there",
reads the stuff we write on this list, and cares.
So, 3 cheers for the List-Mum!
Dear List members,
First, an apology from me: I just don't have time to read this list
like I used to. I miss you all and the great conversations here, but
I have to focus first on direct customer support and other
activities. I'm still list mom, but I have delegated a certain amount
to o
Hi Erik,
I did try this initially, but Windows Movie Maker does not natively open
.VOB files (says they're unsupported). I have since learned that .VOB is
nearly the same as mpeg2 and it's actually possible to change the
extension to mpg and it WMM will open them. Ah, if I'd known then what I
Not paper. The reports are provided via a secure web connection. But yes,
it's a free crash analysis service provided by Microsoft for Windows XP and
later that would seem to be a valuable way to diagnose program crashes. Rev
apparently does not participate in it. Earlier in the thread I gave a
51 matches
Mail list logo