Hello,
Since yesterday evening, when I am closing a stack (small red button
top left), if I click on don't save, the modifications I made are
saved however ! :-((
I spent hours trying to find what's happening, but without any success.
I suppose I have got a wrong inadvertent setting
Hi Andre,
did you remove the stack from memory before reopening? Check the
destroyStack property of the stack. If it is false it will remain in
memory when closed.
I suppose I have got a wrong inadvertent setting somewhere ??
All the best,
Malte
Hi Malte
I was just about discovering that when I received your message ! I
was beginning to experiment with and without destroyStack property
Very nice, and Thanks a lot ! :-)))
That 's the solution : for what I need, I must set the destroyStack
to true
I think, actually, I never (or very
Hey,
Is it possible to activate a function that resides in one stack, and get
the result from a different stack? Right now I have it set up so that Stack
A gets a request for info from stack B over the Internet. Lets pretend that
the request is the background color of this stack. It puts that
Right now I have it set up so that Stack
A gets a request for info from stack B over the
Internet.
Well, you could set things up so that Stack A uses
'put' to
deliver the requested data into a field in Stack B -
lets call it
RecData.
At the end of the script in Stack B requesting data
from
The only really convenient way to use functions in other stacks is to
put those other stacks 'in use', so that their scripts are in the
message path.
I'm not very clear on which stack is requesting what from where, but
it sounds like you're loading a stack into a local machines memory
Hi Andre,
You might be interested in checking the corresponding preference in
the Files and memory pane in the preferences:
Nothing to think of later :-)
Le 29 oct. 06 à 15:09, André.Bisseret a écrit :
Hi Malte
I was just about discovering that when I received your message ! I
was
Bonsoir Éric,
Nice advice ! very useful indeed in the case of the app. I am
developing.
Merci Éric
amitiés de Grenoble
André
Le 29 oct. 06 à 18:22, Eric Chatonet a écrit :
Hi Andre,
You might be interested in checking the corresponding preference in
the Files and memory pane in the
On Oct 29, 2006, at 9:49 AM, Bridger Maxwell wrote:
Is there a send
equivalent for functions?
Consider 'value()'.
You can specify an object. (But this will not work on functions that
return arrays, if you specify the object.)
Dar
___
Is it possible to activate a function that resides in one stack,
and get
the result from a different stack?
It is possible,
---
A. The send
On Oct 29, 2006, at 3:07 PM, Marielle Lange wrote:
Stack A
-
on mouseup
send doSomething to stack stackB
wait 1 tick (in case of, I believe that's not needed but I tend
to add it)
put the handlername_result of stack stackB into tResult.
--- reading
I think there is a shortcut. You can use 'the result' for other
than errors for custom commands.
I would bet you are right. But, but.. this could let us pass an array
back to the calling script. Let's try.
Stack A
-
on mouseup
send doSomething to button 1 of stack stackB
put
On Oct 29, 2006, at 4:35 PM, Marielle Lange wrote:
Tadam...
1
2
3
4
Yikes! I was sure that didn't work!
Dar
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your
On Oct 29, 2006, at 4:42 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
On Oct 29, 2006, at 4:35 PM, Marielle Lange wrote:
Tadam...
1
2
3
4
Yikes! I was sure that didn't work!
Never mind. It is in parameters where that does not work.
Dar
___
use-revolution mailing
How does one modify the appearance of the stock disabled icons for
buttons? For example, the stock disabled icon for a square button
with 3D, Border, and Hilite Border checked is transparent... I like
the way it looks, but need it to be less so.
Thanks
Mark
Never mind. It is in parameters where that does not work.
You are right. This works:
on mouseup
put 1 into aTest[1]
put 2 into aTest[2]
get return_array(aTest)
put the result into aResult
combine aResult using cr
answer aResult
end mouseup
function return_array
Note that the post has now been archived on the code website:
http://codes.widged.com/?q=node/724
... with code coloring.
Enjoy,
Marielle
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe
On Oct 29, 2006, at 6:13 PM, Marielle Lange wrote:
What is exactly the scope of this the result?
According to the doc: The result function is set to empty when the
current handler finishes executing.
I have tried grabbing 'the result' in logging functions, but found I
needed to pass it
Dar Scott wrote:
I'm not sure, but I think 'the result' is set to empty at the _start_ of
handlers and of some built-in functions and commands.
Lots of built-in commands and functions set the result, and those will
replace any current value immediately. Otherwise, the docs say the
result is
This is too weird. I have an app that uses a custom external. I've been
working with it for months, up until recently, when I stopped testing it.
Today I tried it again and it won't load at all, either in Revolution or
in the standalone. I get error in function handler at the place where
the
20 matches
Mail list logo
