Scott Morrow wrote:
Is there a way to query for an Intel Mac when running under rev 2.6.1
without using the processor function which seems to report
incorrectly?
Any chance you could use Rev 2.8.1 for your OS X build? The current
version shows x86 for processor() on an Intel Mac, as
Hi,
I have an Application that uses FTP to upload a file to a server. It
works well when running under the IDE in Windows and Mac. When I run
it a a standalone I get an FTP error again on Windows and Mac.
I'm using the libURLftpUploadFile command with a call back, the
call back gets
Hi list,
the following command :
set width of fld 1 to the formattedwidth of fld 1
truncates a few pixels on the right when the font is italic...
Is there a way to bypass this problem ?
I'm using Rev 2.5 on Mac Classic, and need to know
precisely the width of large characters (100 pixels
Scott, you can test for 'endianness;
function isIntel
return (char 1 of (binaryencode(I,1)) is not null)
end isIntel
Best,
Mark
On 30 Oct 2007, at 06:32, Scott Morrow wrote:
Is there a way to query for an Intel Mac when running under rev
2.6.1 without using the processor function
Hi Dave,
The source of the problem could be anything. Try setting a log field
with the libURLSetLogField
command and let us know what it reports.
Posting your script might help as well.
Best regards,
Mark Schonewille
--
Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering
Hi friends,
today we installed OS X 10.5 on one of our machines and did some tests
with our new project, which uses a lot of metal windows.
Result:
The app is completely unusable!
All windows/stacks go empty when suspending and most of the time stay
blank/empty when resuming or even open blank.
Klaus,
I don't have leopard in here but as far as I know, metal has been
removed from leopard, they have a unified UI now, both aqua windows
and metal windows appear as this new unified ui.
Maybe since Rev used some emulated controls on top of metal, this is
broken. Can you try to use acqua?
Hi Andre,
Klaus,
I don't have leopard in here but as far as I know, metal has been
removed from leopard, they have a unified UI now, both aqua windows
and metal windows appear as this new unified ui.
Maybe since Rev used some emulated controls on top of metal, this is
broken. Can you try to
On 30/10/07 12:00, Klaus Major [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
today we installed OS X 10.5 on one of our machines and did some tests
with our new project, which uses a lot of metal windows.
Result:
The app is completely unusable!
All windows/stacks go empty when suspending and most of the time
Well, Rev is not yet spec'd for Leopard.
You are not alone. There are so many apps that I use* that are not
ready, that I've put off installing Leopard indefinitely, even though
I just bought the 'family pack'.
My opinion: metal mode has been so unstable for so long that it
deserved to be
All bets are off when there is a major change in the OS version and
it's been days since the rollout.
Perhaps you are being a bit unfair to Rev expecting your 2.8.1 stacks
to work perfectly in the new environment.
It is not because metal does not work, it is because the stacks (metal or not)
This only matters if:
1. You intend to develop software for Mac OS 10.5
2. You have installed Mac OS 10.5 on your machine.
Two things occur to me about this:
1. The number of people who use Macintosh computers is
small.
2. Is it worth investing the money for:-
Mac OS 10.5
Waiting
Stephen Barncard wrote:
the new environment
Really?
Since when was a POINT upgrade a new environment ?
Microsoft made it extremely clear that Vista was a the
new environment;
Apple did nothing of the sort.
I am prepared to bet that Runtime Revolution will not
claim that RR 2.9 is a new RAD,
http://myownapp.com/
especially Schnippselchen
These are Macintosh applications.
sincerely, Richmond Mathewson
A Thorn in the flesh is better than a failed Systems Development Life Cycle.
1. The number of people who use Macintosh computers is
small.
current mac market share is now estimated at 8%.
This is important if your customers use Macs.
That is to say: a lot more processor-hungry eye-candy
at the price of all sorts of applications needing
pricey upgrades, plus merry
Um, regardless of what you think about the designation, it's a
change, a new environment, otherwise why would metal not work?
I know of no such rules regarding 'point' versions.
Sorry I offended you with my semantics.
Stephen Barncard wrote:
the new environment
Really?
Since when was a
Hi Stephen,
All bets are off when there is a major change in the OS version and
it's been days since the rollout.
Perhaps you are being a bit unfair to Rev expecting your 2.8.1
stacks to work perfectly in the new environment.
I exspect them to WORK, not perfectly, but usable!
It is not
Besides, don't Rev get developer seeds to test on? I reckon this
should have been fixed for 2.8.1 gm3, not for 2.9.
Cheers,
Luis.
On 30 Oct 2007, at 15:21, Stephen Barncard wrote:
Um, regardless of what you think about the designation, it's a
change, a new environment, otherwise why
Hi Kevin,
On 30/10/07 12:00, Klaus Major [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
today we installed OS X 10.5 on one of our machines and did some
tests
with our new project, which uses a lot of metal windows.
Result:
The app is completely unusable!
All windows/stacks go empty when suspending and most of
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:03:15 + (GMT), Richmond Mathewson wrote:
Stephen Barncard wrote:
the new environment
Really?
Since when was a POINT upgrade a new environment ?
Ever since 10.0 was released... or haven't you noticed? Of course it
depends on what you mean by new environment,
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 14:56:44 + (GMT), Richmond Mathewson wrote:
This only matters if:
1. You intend to develop software for Mac OS 10.5
2. You have installed Mac OS 10.5 on your machine.
Don't be ridiculous, Richmond... most people are developing software
that doesn't use metal
Friends,
anyone tried 2.9 in Mac OS X 10.5?
With every release, Apple, fix their UI. What was once aqua with a
unified pinstripe-happy solid UI, changed into a collection of strange
elements during the latest releases. We got like 10 types of buttons,
metal, aqua, paladium windows. With no rule
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:47:02 +, Mark Smith wrote:
Scott, you can test for 'endianness;
function isIntel
return (char 1 of (binaryencode(I,1)) is not null)
end isIntel
Wow, Mark... that's a lot easier than what I was doing:
function isIntel
put shell(system_profiler
On 30/10/07 15:41, Klaus Major [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its not really surprising that Rev 2.8.1 doesn't run perfectly on
Leopard
given that it shipped many months before that OS.
...which came out surprisingly last friday?
Right, 4 days ago. There are dozens of applications that do not
Only in Revolution we can solve this issues using our own language itself! :-)
try that in a glitch with something like RB...
On 10/30/07, Kevin Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/10/07 15:41, Klaus Major [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its not really surprising that Rev 2.8.1 doesn't run
Well first of all, many people have the I'll wait until
Service Pack 1 is out (Windows) or I'll wait until 10.x.1
is out (Mac) attitude, and this is a legitimate perspective.
I have Leopard installed on an external drive at the moment
to do testing, etc., but I'm not going to upgrade
On Oct 30, 2007, at 9:45 AM, Lynn Fredricks wrote:
Well first of all, many people have the I'll wait until
Service Pack 1 is out (Windows) or I'll wait until 10.x.1
is out (Mac) attitude, and this is a legitimate perspective.
I have Leopard installed on an external drive at the moment
to do
Problems is new machines will now be shipped with Leopard and if you
are in the education market here in the states there a lot of macs
and the new machines are the ones that they want to run the
multimedia apps on that i do with rev.
Have others tried other rev 2.6-2.8 standalones in
http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2007/10/29/no_java_for_leopard/
I guess Sun is having their issues too...
Best regards,
Lynn Fredricks
Paradigma Software
http://www.paradigmasoft.com
Valentina SQL Server: The Ultra-fast, Royalty Free Database Server
Their issue is way bigger than Revolution... No java 6 in leopard, and
Apple broke java 5 in this release. I feel sorry for all the coders
and support people that will need to stay awake forever to solve this
for enterprise clients...
:-/
On 10/30/07, Lynn Fredricks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I took a little cruise on the 'net this morning and found a number
of other development systems with Leopard issues, including, RealBASIC,
Java, and even the work of the most dedicated Mac programmer I know,
SuperCard.
When other systems have problems with an OS X upgrade I usually
Just FYI, I've updated my site to keep track of the items that have
been found relative to the changeover to Leopard:
http://www.sonsothunder.com/devres/revolution/compatibility.htm
As more are discovered I'll update the list there, but at least this
gives a starting point for all the
Hi Kevin,
On 30/10/07 15:41, Klaus Major [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Its not really surprising that Rev 2.8.1 doesn't run perfectly on
Leopard
given that it shipped many months before that OS.
...which came out surprisingly last friday?
Right, 4 days ago. There are dozens of applications that
Kevin,
I would be more confident in Rev 2.9... if your response had been :
the needed patch is/will be available soon to our current customers
at www.runrev.com.
Regards,
--
Pierre Sahores
mobile : 06 03 95 77 70
www.sahores-conseil.com
Le 30 oct. 07 à 15:25, Kevin Miller a écrit :
On
Ken Ray wrote:
Don't be ridiculous, Richmond..
and why on earth not?
It sure stimulated the debate!
Of course it is worth developing for 10.5; and as time
goes on it will get easier - however it will involve
both a financial and a mental investment (Um, what new
thing doesn't ?) - and the
Thanks! I think it's quite interesting that the solutions we find
often reflect the kind of things we've been doing. Because I've been
doing a lot of playing around with binary data (audio files, iPod
dictionaries, id3 tags), the question of endianness has been quite
prevalent. So I saw
As a long-time Mac Fan I am beginning to wonder if Mac
have not done
A Vista with Leopard . . .
That is to say: a lot more processor-hungry eye-candy
at the price of all sorts of applications needing
pricey upgrades, plus merry blue-green screens.
Actually, Leopard has some great features.
Hi,
I am using revExecuteSQL to execute a INSERT INTO SQL statement,
as in:
revExecuteSQL theDatabaseID,mySQLCode
put the result into myResult
When the command returns the result is set to 1. I've looked in the
docs but it I can't seem to find anything that tells me what that
On 10/31/07, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When the command returns the result is set to 1. I've looked in the
docs but it I can't seem to find anything that tells me what that means?
Anyone know
The command was successful, otherwise you'd have an SQL error message in
'the result'. I
Hi,
The other database handlers return empty to mean ok. I had a problem
executing a CREATE TABLE SQL statement and it returned a 1 and
didn't work correctly. When I found and fixed the problem it then
returned empty, so I am wondering if a similar problem exists here -
it doesn't seem
Dave,
I think that 1 means 1 record successfully inserted. Try a query
to insert 2 records in the same query and check if it returns 2...
Andre
On 10/30/07, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am using revExecuteSQL to execute a INSERT INTO SQL statement,
as in:
revExecuteSQL
Just FYI: changed the theme, search box now works with things like
$, @, etc.
http://revcoders.org
Also, I put a stack here:
http://revcoders.org/resources/revcoders_db_api.rev.zip
that just begins to show how to integrate a local stack with the
remote database. (it will improve over the
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:55:58 -0700, Josh Mellicker wrote:
Just FYI: changed the theme, search box now works with things like
$, @, etc.
http://revcoders.org
Just curious Josh, everytime I have gone to the site, it looks like I'm
always looking at the last page of the entries (in fact I
Sarah Reichelt wrote:
Actually, Leopard has some great features. Spaces alone will make my
Rev work much easier. I also get the feeling that it is faster than
Tiger.
Ditto that... confirmed... much faster than tiger
though after trying Mail.app for 1/2 hour I immediately
went back to
Mark,
This solution works brilliantly in 2.8.1 - unfortunately for some
reason it always seems to return false in 2.6.1 no matter the
processor. I don't understand the logic behind it so I'm no good to
trouble shoot here.
Thanks,
Scott
On Oct 30, 2007, at 3:47 AM, Mark Smith wrote:
45 matches
Mail list logo
