On Jun 26, 2009, at 10:33 PM, Ludovic Thébault wrote:
Le 27 juin 09 à 07:09, Colin Holgate a écrit :
You don't mention which OS you're on, but I wouldn't be surprised
if you've hit a 4096 pixel limitation. If you use the 8 megapixel
setting on the camera you should be ok, or resize the 13
Le 27 juin 09 à 08:06, Jerry J a écrit :
Vote for bug # 4026 !!
http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=4026
--Jerry J
Done !___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe
How long a week seems when one is waiting for the Beta
of a life time. . .
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
I have uploaded my 'take' on this problem:
http://mathewson.110mb.com/FILEZ/IMAGE COMPARE.rev.zip
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Bert Shuler bertshu...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have written this code a few different ways. Each seems to be equally
inefficient. I am attempting to compare to
Richmond Mathewson wrote:
I have uploaded my 'take' on this problem:
http://mathewson.110mb.com/FILEZ/IMAGE COMPARE.rev.zip
Ho, Hum . . . clicking on the above takes you to some daft templates page.
If, however, you copy-paste
http://mathewson.110mb.com/FILEZ/IMAGE COMPARE.rev.zip
into
Hi,
Any idea to change the point by comma in the decimal numbers? I convert each
query and each insert or update... exist other way?
Salut,
Josep
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/NumberFormat-with-SQLite-or-mySQL-tp24232124p24232124.html
Sent from the Revolution - User
Kay C Lan wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Kay C Lan lan.kc.macm...@gmail.comwrote:
http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/page.php?site_id=nrsiitem_id=ukelele
If you reassign shift to the caps key, then maybe in the locked state it
will be as if you had shift lock. Worth a try I
Hi from Paris,
I bought a Sony-DSC-F717 a couple of years back - went into my list
of Best-Spent Money items - gives beautiful photos of 5 Megapixels
(I never change the setting).
The photos each represent about 2 MB, and with that, I can print out a
high quality photo on A4, reasonable
Completely without running anything, it would seem more efficient to
divide one char by another. If the result is anything other than 1, it's
different. I have no idea if these are alphas or numerics, if alpha then
convert using chartonum.
Also, try commenting out your status update or
On 27 Jun 2009, at 17:45, Francis Nugent Dixon wrote:
Which brings me to the forum question I've got photos of 13
megapixels that Rev can't handle. Who wants to push the
(Revolution) envelope that far ?
People writing tools for photographers? In my case a photographer
writing tools for
I have written this code a few different ways. Each seems to be
equally inefficient. I am attempting to compare to images, pixel by
pixel, and record the differences.
ON mouseUp pMouseBtnNo
put 0 into c
set the startvalue of scrollbar Progress to 0
set the endvalue of scrollbar
I also forgot one other critical speed factor: the imagedata uses *four*
bytes per pixel in the image, and the first byte is always the same. So
checking every byte requires four times as many tests as required, compared
to checking four bytes at a time. [Weirdly, my first byte always shows as
I have a problem that does not make sense to me.
I am using RunRev 2.6.1 on a windows system. I have a script that puts an
image into the clipboard when I ctrl+right click on the image.
I know the script works because I can then paste the image into another
RunRev stack without difficulty.
That doesn't involve sex, drugs or computer games:
http://mathewson.110mb.com/res.html
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription
preferences:
I have a question about exporting an image.
I get the following error:
export: can't write to file, mask file, or container
When I try to export a fairly large image. It is a large image, but not
enormous.
Thing is, I know that I am not writing to a file that is already in use,
because the
Le 27 juin 09 à 18:45, Francis Nugent Dixon a écrit :
Hi from Paris,
I bought a Sony-DSC-F717 a couple of years back - went into my list
of Best-Spent Money items - gives beautiful photos of 5 Megapixels
(I never change the setting).
The photos each represent about 2 MB, and with that, I
Which brings me to the forum question I've got photos of 13 megapixels that
Rev can't handle. Who wants to push the (Revolution) envelope that far ?
Me for one. My app Pic-a-POD http://www.troz.net/Pic-a-POD/ suffers
greatly from this problem as more and more large images appear on the
Hello,
The gmane search engine seems to be down
so I'll ask it here.
It's been years since I've used a Mac, but
I'm assuming for now that the mouse
generally shipped with Macs still doesn't
use a left/right (and centre) click like
Windows mice do.
If so, what is an elegant/simple way of
On Jun 27, 2009, at 9:43 PM, Nicolas Cueto wrote:
Must I build for all three?
Can I just go with OS X universal?
That would make sense. It would be a small percentage of people that
might use your stack that are still using Classic Mac OS. Being just
OSX would mean that you could leave
Hello Nicolas,
Right-click is supported on the Mac. For users who don't have a 2 or
3 button mouse it is also accessible as Control-click click. Rev
takes care of this as both Right-clicking and Control-clicking
result in mouse button 3
A Universal build is a bit larger but otherwise
Hello Nicolas,
Whoops, Colin is correct. With Rev 2.6.1 you can also build for Mac
Classic which allows Mac users still running the Classic OS 9 system
to use your software. (The OS 9 system can't run a Universal
build... that is only for OSX) If it is educational software OS 9
might
I know I've seen this in the archives somewhere but I can't seem to find
it. I need to do a screen capture (whole screen is ok but I'd rather
not have the menu and task bars on Windows if I can avoid it). We use a
program for mapping data collection radios and we currently have to
carry a
Len Morgan wrote:
The image takes up the whole screen so I can't have a stack in the way
or I'll miss some part of the diagram. I've tried the export snapshot
but I can't seem to get it to work without having the user use the mouse
to draw the area to be captured. Is there a way to define
Recently, J. Landman Gay wrote:
If you do something like this, you won't have to minimize the stack, it
will hide itself while taking the shot:
on mouseUp
put the working screenrect into tRect
Interesting -- never seen the use of working before. Go to know, thanks.
Regards,
Scott
24 matches
Mail list logo