Re: revServer installation issues

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:49 AM, Phil Davis wrote: > I managed to replicate your problem here on my mac os x, am trying to solve >> it. >> > > Wow. Thanks Andre! That's huge! > I am good at breaking things, specially my computers! > > Phil -- http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code.

Re: revServer installation issues

On 10/20/10 10:25 PM, Andre Garzia wrote: Phil, check your error_log after you try to access your irev file, see if there is a premature end of headers and a permission error, one next to the other. That usually means suEXEC error. Nope, nothing like that. I have an image missing so I get that

Re: revServer installation issues

Phil, check your error_log after you try to access your irev file, see if there is a premature end of headers and a permission error, one next to the other. That usually means suEXEC error. I managed to replicate your problem here on my mac os x, am trying to solve it. andre On Thu, Oct 21, 201

Re: revServer installation issues

Hi Mike, On 10/20/10 4:57 PM, Mike Bonner wrote: out of curiosity, are you changing the files in /etc/httpd or /etc/apache2 if in httpd, try apache2 (if you're pretty sure you're setting them up right) or if trying apache2 try httpd Assuming both folders exist. Nope, only the 'apache2' folder

Re: revServer installation issues

er/CGI-Executables/$1" ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/revserver /Library/WebServer/CGI-Executables/revserver ## PD 20101020 added --- Third set of changes --- # # TypesConfig points to the file containing the list of mappin

Re: On-Rev File Browser Upload Dialog

Andre, I'm just a little surprised that with as powerful as Rev is, we are still forced to use the older solutions. Thanks for the clarification anyway. Rick On Oct 20, 2010, at 3:45 PM, Andre Garzia wrote: > Rick, > > There is no way around this. > > RevServer is not like the desktop engine

Re: RUG Meeting Tomorrow in Southern California

Bill Vlahos wrote: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/socalrev/messages Hope to see you there. Thanks for posting that, Bill. I just finished a video test with Andre, and he's on board to provide a live presentation on networking in Rev for the meeting tomorrow night. Should be a good tim

Re: [OT] Mac App Store

On Oct 21, 2010, at 3:01 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > Looks like staying in the Mac game is about to get more expensive for > everyone, from tool makers to developers and to some degree consumers as that > 30% tax starts to get spread around. If this ends up like iPhone/iPad apps then prices dr

RUG Meeting Tomorrow in Southern California

http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/socalrev/messages Hope to see you there. Bill Vlahos _ InfoWallet (http://www.infowallet.com) is about keeping your important life information with you, accessible, and secure. ___ use-revolution mail

Re: [OT] Mac App Store

I also thought this was going to happen and agree that it makes a lot of sense. However, I don't see Apple ever locking out other applications. This is just a great way to get them. Bill Vlahos _ InfoWallet (http://www.infowallet.com) is about keeping your important life informa

Re: [OT] Mac App Store

On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Monte Goulding < mo...@sweattechnologies.com> wrote: > > Wow, even though many scoffed, I predicted this would happen on the > > improve-list only a few months ago. That's a big camel's nose peeking in > > under the tent. > > > > Jeez, how long before you have to

Re: [OT] Mac App Store

And now we know the rest of the story-- why the recent changes in iOS licensing terms. Can you even IMAGINE what this announcement would have implied had those changes NOT taken place? On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:43 PM, Chipp Walters wrote: > Wow, even though many scoffed, I predicted this would h

Re: [OT] Mac App Store

> Wow, even though many scoffed, I predicted this would happen on the > improve-list only a few months ago. That's a big camel's nose peeking in > under the tent. > > Jeez, how long before you have to JAILBREAK your Mac in order to put your > own programs on it? I believe it's just around the corn

Re: [OT] Mac App Store

Wow, even though many scoffed, I predicted this would happen on the improve-list only a few months ago. That's a big camel's nose peeking in under the tent. Jeez, how long before you have to JAILBREAK your Mac in order to put your own programs on it? I believe it's just around the corner..haven't

Re: [OT] Mac App Store

Lynn Fredricks wrote: I went to find out, and they provide a link, but apparently the Mac Dev Program now requires a fee like the iOS program, so you need to give them money in order to find out if it's worth giving them money. I gotta say that fills me with a certain envy: I wish I had what i

Re: [OT] Mac App Store

Recently, Lynn Fredricks wrote: > Given how awful software is in the channel here in the USA, I think this is > a good thing for Mac developers. It will be interesting to see what sort of > restrictions or requirements there will be.

Re: revServer installation issues

out of curiosity, are you changing the files in /etc/httpd or /etc/apache2 if in httpd, try apache2 (if you're pretty sure you're setting them up right) or if trying apache2 try httpd Assuming both folders exist. And did you turn in ExecCGI in the options for whatever directory you're setting up?

Re: revServer installation issues

Phil, It seems clear that the config file isn't quite right, and that the revServer engine isn't being launched. Where are your revServer files installed, and can you post the mods you made to your httpd.conf file? Also, which OS version are you running? Devin On Oct 20, 2010, at 5:19 PM, Phi

revServer installation issues

Hey folks - I'm trying to figure out where I'm going wrong as I try to get revServer going on my Mac Mini. I have followed all the advice (I think) in the great emails from Devin Asay and Mike Bonner from July 20 and I see my test.irev page being served but without the stuff being preprocesse

RE: [OT] Mac App Store

> I went to find out, and they provide a link, but apparently > the Mac Dev Program now requires a fee like the iOS program, > so you need to give them money in order to find out if it's > worth giving them money. > > I gotta say that fills me with a certain envy: I wish I had > what it takes

Re: [OT] Mac App Store

You clearly have never been in politics. Bob On Oct 20, 2010, at 3:11 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > Lynn Fredricks wrote: > >>> check out: http://www.apple.com/mac/app-store/ >> >> Given how awful software is in the channel here in the USA, I think this is >> a good thing for Mac developers. It

Re: On-Rev File Browser Upload Dialog

HELP Mr. Wizard HELP!!! I don't wanna be a web developer anymore!!! Bob On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:45 PM, Andre Garzia wrote: > Rick, > > There is no way around this. > > RevServer is not like the desktop engine, there is no GUI. Actually the > whole web is like this, you communicate using statel

Re: >

I have a business account at South Coast Plaza in Orange County CA. They do pretty well. Sometimes they are required to send it out. I think that is all controlled from Cupertino. Bob On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:10 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > On 10/20/10 1:18 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: > >> In my

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

Not complaining, just thought it was a funny thing to say. :-) Bob On Oct 20, 2010, at 11:52 AM, Richmond wrote: > On 10/20/2010 09:28 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote: >> The rub lies in the fact that Revolution (WHOOPS! Sorry RunRev (WHOOP! Sorry >> LiveCode!)) > > That reminds me of the way Supercard

Re: [OT] Mac App Store

Lynn Fredricks wrote: check out: http://www.apple.com/mac/app-store/ Given how awful software is in the channel here in the USA, I think this is a good thing for Mac developers. It will be interesting to see what sort of restrictions or requirements there will be. I went to find out, and the

Re: [OT] Mac App Store

On Oct 20, 2010, at 3:27 PM, Scott Rossi wrote: >> check out: http://www.apple.com/mac/app-store/ >> >> Will our LiveCode apps be featured >> there? So far we do not know since the thing was announced 10 minutes ago, >> but one can only hope! > > I read some

Re: [OT] Mac App Store

Recently, Andre Garzia wrote: > check out: http://www.apple.com/mac/app-store/ > > Will our LiveCode apps be featured > there? So far we do not know since the thing was announced 10 minutes ago, > but one can only hope! I read sometime in November... Regards

Re: [OT] Mac App Store

This is very interesting and seems to be a huge opportunity for RR/LC developers. It appears that regular executables will work on the Apple Mac Store. Tom McGrath III Lazy River Software http://lazyriver.on-rev.com 3mcgr...@comcast.net I Can Speak - Communication for the rest of us... http://

Re: On-Rev File Browser Upload Dialog

Rick, There is no way around this. RevServer is not like the desktop engine, there is no GUI. Actually the whole web is like this, you communicate using stateless transactions exchanging what is basically text. What you do is send a form to the browser with the correct encoding and inputs and the

Re: On-Rev File Browser Upload Dialog

Hi Matthias, This is an interesting solution. It uses a combination of javascript, irev, etc.. I installed the code, and it doesn't want to work just yet. It's telling me that the form isn't supported. Looks like it will only work with a multi-part form? I'll make one and try it again. Any

RE: [OT] Mac App Store

> check out: http://www.apple.com/mac/app-store/ Given how awful software is in the channel here in the USA, I think this is a good thing for Mac developers. It will be interesting to see what sort of restrictions or requirements there will be. A 30% margin to retail is about right, provided there

Re: >

On 10/20/10 1:18 PM, Richard Gaskin wrote: In my experiences attempting repairs through the Apple store they don't do much in the store, and send most of it out to a remote center which they tell me takes between two and four weeks. Odd. I've never had that happen. They've always done repairs

[OT] Mac App Store

Folks, check out: http://www.apple.com/mac/app-store/ Will our LiveCode apps be featured there? So far we do not know since the thing was announced 10 minutes ago, but one can only hope! Andre -- http://www.andregarzia.com All We Do Is Code. ___

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

On 10/20/2010 09:28 PM, Bob Sneidar wrote: The rub lies in the fact that Revolution (WHOOPS! Sorry RunRev (WHOOP! Sorry LiveCode!)) That reminds me of the way Supercard and Toolbook kept changing ownership . . . ___ use-revolution mailing list use

Re: >

Bob Sneidar wrote: > I mean that Dell will not repair your computer beyond the 3 years > extended warranty, because they have no infrastructure to do that. > Apple will repair a 10 year old computer if they still have parts, > as long as you are willing to pay for it... For their prices I can us

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

The rub lies in the fact that Revolution (WHOOPS! Sorry RunRev (WHOOP! Sorry LiveCode!)) allows short references to objects. If you refer to "button 1", LiveCode resolves this internally to mean "button 1 of [the background the button belongs to if any of] the card I am currently looking at of t

Re: [ANN]BvG Docu 1.7

Björnke- Wednesday, October 20, 2010, 4:41:27 AM, you wrote: > I fixed that, and i changed the test of "revappversion() = 4.5.0" > to "char 1 to 3 of the version = 4.5". I think that one should also > work in metacard, as well as for those crazy people who use beta > versions of the ide as main e

Re: Franklin Audio Intro Pricing Ends Soon; New Testable Too!

I mean that Dell will not repair your computer beyond the 3 years extended warranty, because they have no infrastructure to do that. Apple will repair a 10 year old computer if they still have parts, as long as you are willing to pay for it, and I happen to live down the street from an Apple sto

Re: [ANN]BvG Docu 1.7

Have you tested the increase type size on Linux? It does not seem to work for me. Debian Squeeze and Fluxbox. Peter -- View this message in context: http://runtime-revolution.278305.n4.nabble.com/ANN-BvG-Docu-1-7-tp3000985p3004334.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at N

[OT] USB 2.0 PCI card in a G3 Mac

Anybody with any drivers / ideas ? sincerely, Richmond. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

Robert, Thanks for your explanation and your time! Charles Szasz csz...@mac.com On Oct 20, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Robert Brenstein [via Runtime Revolution] wrote: > On 20.10.10 at 09:47 -0700 charles61 apparently wrote: > > >Robert, > > > >I understand your previous e-mail about using custom

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

On 20.10.10 at 09:47 -0700 charles61 apparently wrote: Robert, I understand your previous e-mail about using custom handlers. I have never used this concept before. But I am not following you when you sent the following: f one uses full reference in the called script (that is script in btn

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

Robert, I understand your previous e-mail about using custom handlers. I have never used this concept before. But I am not following you when you sent the following: f one uses full reference in the called script (that is script in btn b of cd y refers to itself as btn b of cd y) then going

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

Hi Robert, > On 20.10.10 at 18:04 +0200 Klaus on-rev apparently wrote: >> >> Anyway, your script may fail if your mouseup function does sth that refers to the buttons on the other card, which are not present on the current card and it does not make full reference to them but only us

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

Klaus, Thanks! Charles Szasz csz...@mac.com On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Klaus on-rev [via Runtime Revolution] wrote: > Hi Charles, > > > Klaus, > > > > Your script worked! > > Go figure :-) > > > What changes do I have to make if I wanted to use this script to send a > > mouseU

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

Hi Charles, > Klaus, > > Your script worked! Go figure :-) > What changes do I have to make if I wanted to use this script to send a > mouseUp to checkboxes on marked cards? I did not use marked cards in my > sample stack. See below... > Charles Szasz > csz...@mac.com > > > ... >> >>

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

On 20.10.10 at 18:04 +0200 Klaus on-rev apparently wrote: >> Anyway, your script may fail if your mouseup function does sth that refers to the buttons on the other card, which are not present on the current card and it does not make full reference to them but only uses short names. To avoi

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

Klaus, Your script worked! What changes do I have to make if I wanted to use this script to send a mouseUp to checkboxes on marked cards? I did not use marked cards in my sample stack. Charles Szasz csz...@mac.com On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Klaus on-rev [via Runtime Revolution] wrote:

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

Charles Szasz csz...@mac.com Klaus, Thanks for your suggestion! I will try it. Thanks again! On Oct 20, 2010, at 12:05 PM, Klaus on-rev [via Runtime Revolution] wrote: > Hi Charles, > > > Robert, > > > > I tried your suggestion. But I get the same results: the checkboxes > > received t

Re: On-Rev File Browser Upload Dialog

Hi Rick, there was something similiar by Magix. Please find the example at the following url. http://matthiasrebbe.eu/on-rev/upld-1.0.zip hth, Matthias Am 20.10.2010 um 17:08 schrieb Rick Harrison: > I really don't want to re-invent the wheel today. > > How can I get a simple file browser

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

Hi Charles, > Robert, > > I tried your suggestion. But I get the same results: the checkboxes received > the message on the first card but the checkboxes on the second card did not > receive the mouseUp message. > > Charles Szasz > csz...@mac.com your script is OK! But check Roberts answer,

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

charles61- Wednesday, October 20, 2010, 7:02:51 AM, you wrote: > I checked the fields and script in this sample stack and cannot find > anything incorrect. So, I have to think there is a problem in my button > script below. There's nothing wrong with this script. The error is probably in the mou

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

This weird! The script editor shows that the checkboxes on the second card are being examined in the repeat loop but the checkboxes that are checked are not receiving the mouseUp command. This is also supported that the checkboxes are not showing the fields that are not hidden. So, I don't kn

Re: Franklin Audio Intro Pricing Ends Soon; New Testable Too!

Bob Sneidar wrote: >> > >> My last purchase was a Dell laptop, and I've been impressed with the >> good performance and solid construction of the machine. I got that >> one second-hand, but now that I know how to get OS-less computers >> from Dell my next one will probably be from them. > > Jus

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

I made a small stack with three cards. On the first card I placed a button with your script. On all cards I placed a checkBox button with a mouseUp handler in it. I ran the handler from the first card, and got results from the handlers on the other cards. In a message dated 10/20/10 11:21:45 A

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

Robert, I tried your suggestion. But I get the same results: the checkboxes received the message on the first card but the checkboxes on the second card did not receive the mouseUp message. Charles Szasz csz...@mac.com On Oct 20, 2010, at 11:10 AM, Robert Brenstein [via Runtime Revolution

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

Robert, I am sorry for the wrong name! I was looking at an e-mail above yours when I sent you a reply. I will try your suggestion and read your comments. Thanks! Charles Szasz csz...@mac.com On Oct 20, 2010, at 11:10 AM, Robert Brenstein [via Runtime Revolution] wrote: > On 20.10.10 at 07:

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

On 20.10.10 at 07:49 -0700 charles61 apparently wrote: Hi Craig! I checked for line breaks but there is none. I think the one in my posting was due to cutting and pasting the code to Nabble. My sample stack of two cards has four checkboxes on one card and four on the second. Each checkbox ha

On-Rev File Browser Upload Dialog

I really don't want to re-invent the wheel today. How can I get a simple file browser upload dialog to upload a file using an irev script located at On-Rev. I understand that I'll probably be using libURLftpUploadFile for this. If this were just a stack I'd be using: answer file "Please choose

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

Hi Craig! I checked for line breaks but there is none. I think the one in my posting was due to cutting and pasting the code to Nabble. My sample stack of two cards has four checkboxes on one card and four on the second. Each checkbox has code to show a field that when it is checked. To see i

Re: Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

Hi. It works. It is possible you left that line break in the second "if" statement? Craig Newman In a message dated 10/20/10 10:04:01 AM, csz...@mac.com writes: > on mouseUp > repeat with y = 1 to the number of cards >       repeat with b= 1 to the number of buttons of card y >          if the

Sending mouseup to checkboxes on different card

I am trying to devise a script to send a mouseUp to checkboxes on different cards that are already checked. The following script works for checkboxes on the first card but gives an execution error message on the second card saying there is no such object. I checked the fields and script in this

Re: determining if user has shell access

> I'm assuming that at this point you don't know if this is some policy setting > or simply the removal of some file. It's a policy setting. Everything works fine if they run as an admin user. Aha! Google is my friend ;-) By checking the registry key: HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Policies\Micr

Re: Stop Rolling Loop

Glad that helped Raz. In practice the wait period can be much much smaller, and in my experience even a zero value will allow most user interface actions to be picked up. Wayne On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Razvan Pantescu wrote: > > Hi Wayne, > Thank you for your suggestions. > I've done th

Re: [ANN]BvG Docu 1.7

Sorry about all that. To start with, I uploaded the wrong file, which actually doesn't create any files at all.. oops I fixed that, and i changed the test of "revappversion() = 4.5.0" to "char 1 to 3 of the version = 4.5". I think that one should also work in metacard, as well as for those cr