RE: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-05 Thread Marty Billingsley
> Dan Shafer wrote: > > > Tough one, Marty, because there are so many free languages out there > > that educational administrators' first knee-jerk reaction (as Andre > > says in his reply) is to look to cost. But if you can get them past > > that point then I imagine Judy Perry will have some comp

RE: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread MisterX
This is very TAOO ish... > Mark Wieder wrote: > > "Erasmatron 4 is being rebuilt from the ground up in Java > in order to > > enable full cross-platform compatibility." > > > > http://www.erasmatazz.com/Erasmatron4/Erasmatron4.html > > > > It's not too late to discover what true cross-platform

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Judy Perry
Exactly. Judy On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Richard Gaskin wrote: > If he can build it faster in Rev and the end-user experience is at least > as good (probably better since he could use all the time he saves coding > beefing up the UI), it would seem he'd come out ahead overall.

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Richard Gaskin
Mark Wieder wrote: "Erasmatron 4 is being rebuilt from the ground up in Java in order to enable full cross-platform compatibility." http://www.erasmatazz.com/Erasmatron4/Erasmatron4.html It's not too late to discover what true cross-platform compatibility is like... looking at the Deikto dictio

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Mark Wieder
Richard- Friday, November 4, 2005, 6:17:02 PM, you wrote: > You know the great Chris Crawford?! He's a god. Loved Siboot -- nothing > like it at the time. Now that's a name I haven't heard in years. I did a quick search: Siboot II is available here: http://www.erasmatazz.com/free.html Apparen

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Judy Perry
Another physics major?!!! (Jeanne's a successful one, I'm a flunk-out). @;-) Judy On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Jim Hurley wrote: > Richard and Judy, > > I suspect this is the same Chris Crawford that was a physics major at > UC Davis many years back. I never had him as a student but he was > legendary

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Jim Hurley
Message: 19 Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 18:17:02 -0800 From: Richard Gaskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev To: How to use Revolution Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Judy Pe

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Judy Perry
On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Richard Gaskin wrote: > You know the great Chris Crawford?! He's a god. Loved Siboot -- nothing > like it at the time. Well, it's not like we do lunch or anything... he'd probably be hard-pressed to remember my name. I sought him out when I found that his great book was out

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Judy Perry
I dunno... maybe I'm at the wrong educational institution, because I can tell you that where I am, admin-types would vastly prefer to pay bucketloads of dollars for something that "everybody" uses and "everybody" has heard of as opposed to a validly competitive free product. To wit: from the Cali

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Richard Gaskin
Judy Perry wrote: And, when I recently mentioned it to Chris Crawford of 'The Art of Computer Game Design,' he said that he only wished that he'd heard of Rev before wading neck-deep into Java. You know the great Chris Crawford?! He's a god. Loved Siboot -- nothing like it at the time. He s

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Judy Perry
Ayyy, now there's the rub! Well, hmmm... For teaching programming to the K-12 crowd, I'd emphasize that you can teach many basic programming concepts without the overhead of stuff that really should be taught later (such as declaring data types, etc.) along the proven path of the Analytical Engi

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Judy Perry
Have you mentioned it to Charles Flickinger? Judy On Fri, 4 Nov 2005, Richard Gaskin wrote: >"Rumors of HyperCard being discontinued at bullsh*t." > - Steve Jobs, at the CAUSE conference > in Long Beach, CA, 1998 > > I keep waiting to see the "When will Apple come clean?" page

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Judy Perry
And, when I recently mentioned it to Chris Crawford of 'The Art of Computer Game Design,' he said that he only wished that he'd heard of Rev before wading neck-deep into Java. Judy On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, Dan Shafer wrote: > I've been known to call it Java without the Java. > > Dan

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Richard Gaskin
John Tregea wrote: HyperCard!!! Just a Rolodex!!! I small sampling of projects I did with HyperCard in the 1990's were: Front end to the Singapore Ministry of Defence payroll system (250,000 transactions per month) integrating Oracle and MD Mars imaging system Overdraft management system for B

RE: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread John Tregea
y OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev Dom wrote: > Mark Wieder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Welcome to the list. I find that if someone already knows what >>HyperCard is then there's no problem. If they don't (most of the >>managers I talk with whe

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Dan Shafer
Tough one, Marty, because there are so many free languages out there that educational administrators' first knee-jerk reaction (as Andre says in his reply) is to look to cost. But if you can get them past that point then I imagine Judy Perry will have some compelling educational arguments t

Rev and education (Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev)

2005-11-04 Thread Andre Garzia
On Nov 4, 2005, at 5:11 PM, Marty Billingsley wrote: And what do you say to non-programmers, particularly school administrators who want to know why we should use this product to teach programming? - marty Marty, for school admins try telling this points: 1) Cheap. Compare the prices o

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Dom
J. Landman Gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For those who are wondering about this, Dom is refering to comments that > Phil Schiller made when I met with him about the decline of HyperCard > some years ago. He told me that HyperCard was really "just a Rolodex" > with little programming value, ther

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Marty Billingsley
Dan Shafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sez: > > So, maybe: > > For experienced programmers: Cross-platform software made easy > > For hobbyists/Inventive Users: Tinker Toys to make your computer do > the things YOU need > > And for those with HyperCard awareness: HyperCard on steroids, cross- > platform, b

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread J. Landman Gay
Dom wrote: Mark Wieder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Welcome to the list. I find that if someone already knows what HyperCard is then there's no problem. If they don't (most of the managers I talk with when trying to pitch a project) then they just don't get it. Anybody knows that HyperCard is

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Andre Garzia
On Nov 4, 2005, at 4:22 PM, Erin D. Smale wrote: Avoiding DLL-Hell is a great point to include when I go evangelising. Imagine how much time one saves not writing or supporting them...Imagine how many headaches users will avoid... :-D -Erin I was telling a friend coder this, and then he

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Erin D. Smale
Richard Gaskin wrote: It's somewhere between funny and sad, but I find one thing that impresses folks who have experience programming on Windows is that the Rev engine is self-contained, and unlike VB or ToolBook doesn't require an army of DLLs strewn all over the hard drive. Avoiding DLL-H

RE: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread MisterX
> >So, maybe: > > > >For experienced programmers: Cross-platform software made easy > > The problem is that every other cross platform solution > boasts the same slogan! don't say that too fast... :) ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lis

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Richard Gaskin
Erin D. Smale wrote: My description of Rev is an RAD tool that lets you construct a GUI as easy as with VB, make it functional with normal language code, and work with all the files, databases, and I/O devices you'd expect it to. Oh, it lets you compile for Windows, MAC, and 'NIX, as well. It

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread David Burgun
So, maybe: For experienced programmers: Cross-platform software made easy The problem is that every other cross platform solution boasts the same slogan! All the Best Dave ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit t

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread David Burgun
The main difference is that if the whole hospital does blow up, it's easy enough to start again (if a pain), e.g. restart the machine/IDE/whatever. But in runrev when you tamper with a stack, you can put it into a state whereby it won't open again! This really that is really strange and frighte

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Dan Shafer
So, maybe: For experienced programmers: Cross-platform software made easy For hobbyists/Inventive Users: Tinker Toys to make your computer do the things YOU need And for those with HyperCard awareness: HyperCard on steroids, cross- platform, blazingly fast, in full color ~

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Richard Gaskin
Dom wrote: Mark Wieder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Welcome to the list. I find that if someone already knows what HyperCard is then there's no problem. If they don't (most of the managers I talk with when trying to pitch a project) then they just don't get it. Anybody knows that HyperCard is

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Dom
Dom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anybody knows that HyperCard is just a Rolodex®! understand: *everybody* ;-) -- Maybe correct, also ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and m

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Dom
Mark Wieder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Welcome to the list. I find that if someone already knows what > HyperCard is then there's no problem. If they don't (most of the > managers I talk with when trying to pitch a project) then they just > don't get it. Anybody knows that HyperCard is just a R

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Alex Tweedly
Mark Wieder wrote: Erin- Friday, November 4, 2005, 6:16:55 AM, you wrote: (2) My next concern was power and ability; a look at the command and and maybe 2.5: I find myself some four to five times as productive writing xtalk as c++ or java. Part of that's getting out of the code-comp

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Mark Wieder
Jim- Thursday, November 3, 2005, 5:08:13 PM, you wrote: > am done. Cross platform made dead easy... (with emphasis on... well... all > of the words.) ...except maybe for "dead"... -- -Mark Wieder [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ use-revolution mailing list

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Mark Wieder
John- Friday, November 4, 2005, 4:33:55 AM, you wrote: > I just called it Hyper-HyperCard > Greetings, just joined the list today by the way. Welcome to the list. I find that if someone already knows what HyperCard is then there's no problem. If they don't (most of the managers I talk with when

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Mark Wieder
Erin- Friday, November 4, 2005, 6:16:55 AM, you wrote: Thanks for the writeup. Nice description. > (1) When I read on the Rev website that it was unlike Java, C++, or VB, > my interest in Revolution increased about tenfold--from an ease of use Interesting. This is the first report I can remembe

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread xavier . bury
> Working in the RunRev IDE developing Applications, is like doing open > brain sugery with the patient still awake and helping you! If you hit > the wrong part of the "brain" this will cause an involuntary reaction > whereby an arm or leg will suddenly fly out and whack you!!! > > Just my .5 c

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread David Burgun
I explained it thusly to a fellow C/C++ programmer: Working in the RunRev IDE developing Applications, is like doing open brain sugery with the patient still awake and helping you! If you hit the wrong part of the "brain" this will cause an involuntary reaction whereby an arm or leg will sudde

RE: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread xavier . bury
Tregea > Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 11:34 PM > To: 'How to use Revolution' > Subject: RE: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev > > I just called it Hyper-HyperCard > > Greetings, just joined the list today by the way. > > Regards > &g

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread Erin D. Smale
TJ Frame wrote: That generally gets people up to speed with the understanding that Rev is not a flavor of Java, C++, Visual Basic etc. which a lot of people seem to imediately assume. As someone new to Rev, I can say that: (1) When I read on the Rev website that it was unlike Java, C++, or VB

RE: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread John Tregea
TECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tregea Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 11:34 PM To: 'How to use Revolution' Subject: RE: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev I just called it Hyper-HyperCard Greetings, just joined the list today by the way. Regards

RE: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-04 Thread John Tregea
: Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev I've been known to call it Java without the Java. Dan On Nov 3, 2005, at 5:16 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: > J. Landman Gay wrote: >> Mark Wieder wrote: >>> ...so - any attempt at trying to describe this for folks who hav

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-03 Thread Dan Shafer
I've been known to call it Java without the Java. Dan On Nov 3, 2005, at 5:16 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote: J. Landman Gay wrote: Mark Wieder wrote: ...so - any attempt at trying to describe this for folks who haven't dived in yet? My own twist on an old HyperCard description: "Tinkertoys for

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-03 Thread J. Landman Gay
J. Landman Gay wrote: Mark Wieder wrote: ...so - any attempt at trying to describe this for folks who haven't dived in yet? My own twist on an old HyperCard description: "Tinkertoys for software." Oh, and I forgot, they also used to call it a "software erector set." -- Jacqueline Landman

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-03 Thread Jim Ault
I use the following in part of my 30 second spiel: With Revolution, I can quickly design a tool, like a timer with a graphic interface and a drop down menu, then in one step, compile it to an exe for Windows, an app for Mac OSX, an app for Linux/ Unix. I don't know Unix, and very little Windows,

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-03 Thread J. Landman Gay
Mark Wieder wrote: ...so - any attempt at trying to describe this for folks who haven't dived in yet? My own twist on an old HyperCard description: "Tinkertoys for software." -- Jacqueline Landman Gay | [EMAIL PROTECTED] HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactive

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-03 Thread Dan Shafer
I gave up on that years ago. Dan On Nov 3, 2005, at 4:37 PM, Mark Wieder wrote: ...so - any attempt at trying to describe this for folks who haven't dived in yet? ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-03 Thread TJ Frame
As much as I think these comparisons are misleading and limiting, "Hypercard on Steroids" or "Professional Hypercard" are actually pithys way of getting the essentials across to people. Most programmerish types are aware of Hypercard and the general environment and methodology associated with it (

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-03 Thread Mark Wieder
Dan- Wednesday, November 2, 2005, 2:33:12 PM, you wrote: > "A good experience is rich, something worth exploring, telling others > about, and experiencing again. It's overdetermined - or holistic - or > *integrated*. And being integrated makes it (often) hard to explain, > since one can't truly r

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-02 Thread Judy Perry
I love it!!! Judy On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Dan Shafer wrote: > When HyperCard was my development tool of choice, I often bemoaned > the fact that Apple itself seemed unable to articulate what HyperCard > really was. "It's a digestive aid AND a floor wax!" In my baser > moments, I wondered if the prob

Re: [Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-02 Thread Ken Ray
On 11/2/05 4:33 PM, "Dan Shafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When HyperCard was my development tool of choice, I often bemoaned > the fact that Apple itself seemed unable to articulate what HyperCard > really was. "It's a digestive aid AND a floor wax!" In my baser > moments, I wondered if the pr

[Slightly OT?] Why It's Hard to Explain Rev

2005-11-02 Thread Dan Shafer
When HyperCard was my development tool of choice, I often bemoaned the fact that Apple itself seemed unable to articulate what HyperCard really was. "It's a digestive aid AND a floor wax!" In my baser moments, I wondered if the problem wasn't that Apple was just too dumb to get it. I've h