Re: AVI versus MOV in standalones - Apple Quicktime regulations

2006-10-24 Thread Sivakatirswami
Confirmed here: I'm getting good results with MPEG4 on both platforms. It *does* require WMP v9, so Windows upgrade laggards will be your problem. Luis wrote: Well MPEG-4 should work across the board with recent releases of QT (v7) and WMP (v9). MPEG-2 will get you DVD quality, whereas MPEG-4 h

Re: AVI versus MOV in standalones - Apple Quicktime regulations

2006-10-23 Thread Alex Shaw
Hi Steve I've found saving video in the old mpeg-1 (.mpg) format works fine & is highly compatible because it works on older windows media player & quicktime versions as well (ie. pc & mac). File sizes are not as compact as newer codecs but it also isn't as resource hungry on playback. A

Re: AVI versus MOV in standalones - Apple Quicktime regulations

2006-10-23 Thread Luis
Well MPEG-4 should work across the board with recent releases of QT (v7) and WMP (v9). MPEG-2 will get you DVD quality, whereas MPEG-4 has been aimed at HDTV. Another option is DivX, the players for both are free and to encode DivX you need DivX Pro, which is about $20, although I don't know

Re: AVI versus MOV in standalones - Apple Quicktime regulations

2006-10-23 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, Bill Marriott wrote: > I think that answer is right for mp3 audio. But for video, I don't know of a > one-size-fits-all format. MPEG is one. Problem is, I don't know which codec is best to use, but I have delivered cross-platform CD-ROMs before that used single video files for both typ

Re: AVI versus MOV in standalones - Apple Quicktime regulations

2006-10-23 Thread Bill Marriott
I think that answer is right for mp3 audio. But for video, I don't know of a one-size-fits-all format. The only sure-thing on Windows is AVI, and the only sure-thing on Mac is QuickTime. The only possible exception would be if plain-vanilla QuickTime would play an AVI file (that used one of the

Re: AVI versus MOV in standalones - Apple Quicktime regulations

2006-10-23 Thread james z
Could you have two movies? .mov for Macs and .wmv for windows users? Although .mp3 sounds good too. James Z. On 10/23/06 2:23 PM, "Dan Shafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been studying this question as well for some time and I keep coming to > different conclusions depending on which multi

Re: AVI versus MOV in standalones - Apple Quicktime regulations

2006-10-23 Thread Dan Shafer
I've been studying this question as well for some time and I keep coming to different conclusions depending on which multimedia guru I've consulted most recently. :-) The most recent input I got said, "Why don't you just encode in mp3 and let the system figure out what's the best app for displayi

Re: AVI versus MOV in standalones - Apple Quicktime regulations

2006-10-23 Thread Bill Marriott
Steve, > Can all of this be avoided, including the necessity of including the > Quicktime > installer, by making the Windows version of the standalones using AVI > format? > Do all Windows computers come with AVI reading capabilities preinstalled? > Would there be any drawback to using AVI rathe

Re: AVI versus MOV in standalones - Apple Quicktime regulations

2006-10-23 Thread Klaus Major
Hi Steve, I'm creating Rev standalones containing movies, for both Mac and Windows, to be distributed on CDs. I create the Rev standalones on a Mac, incorporating Quicktime movies. Since many Windows users do not have Quicktime installed on their computers, I include a Quicktime install

AVI versus MOV in standalones - Apple Quicktime regulations

2006-10-23 Thread Stgoldberg
I'm creating Rev standalones containing movies, for both Mac and Windows, to be distributed on CDs. I create the Rev standalones on a Mac, incorporating Quicktime movies. Since many Windows users do not have Quicktime installed on their computers, I include a Quicktime installer on the CD, b