Found a bug [tried to save a script in an image],
went to Bugzilla, lost my password, requested new one
and got a
token
and instructios to click on it - nothing doing?
help me please!
sincerely, Richmond
A Thorn in the flesh is
Selon Bill Marriott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Looks like the password is finally gone. The new Quality Control Center is
> live now at both the old address and the new one:
>
> http://quality.runrev.com
>
>
>
> ___
> use-revolution mailing list
> use-revolu
t; the impression that the installed base is much smaller than it is).
And since there's no link to bugzilla on the rev web site its
existence is somewhat of a secret. The only way someone new coming
into the community would find out about it would be if a link were
posted here or if someone d
open source web front ends for wiki's, blogs and bugzilla are just
fine and do not require any investment at all to install and maintain - they
come bundled with a variety of hosting solutions. What does require a little
investment is building in direct access within the IDE to DEVELOPMENT
In my desire to experiment with trying to be brief, I hit "Send" too soon:
Bill Marriott wrote:
And don't forget that you would not be supporting TWO interfaces
(since you agree the Web one couldn't be avoided).
In this case you would only support one. Ken Ray supports the other.
In all the
Bill Marriott wrote:
So the question is not the separation model, but rather the
delivery/maintenance challenge. The added time/difficulty associated with
those shouldn't be glossed over.
You may be familiar with downloading Rev UIs over the web.
But if one is invested in making an argument a
of such remarks RR decides on. The
> present 'unconfirmed' apparently waiting for the original poster to
> die or disappear is dispiriting.
At the time I was helping out with Bugzilla a year or so ago (when the
"pending" state was added), the "unconfirmed" status
On 12/23/06 11:19 AM, "Bill Marriott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And isn't it a
> little weird to be talking about it as if Ken (and RunRev) weren't in the
> room?
I'm in the room, I'm just sitting over in a corner listening to the
discussion while working on RevZilla revisions and ordering o
Bill-
Saturday, December 23, 2006, 9:19:05 AM, you wrote:
> When Marcus gets back from his vacation, I plan to send him a new GIF for
*Now* I'm worried. Marcus revised the way the web bug system worked,
pushed the changes in, and then left town?
> Center. But it's my hope that we've made the re
Bill-
Saturday, December 23, 2006, 8:22:33 AM, you wrote:
> I'll ask them to look into that. There are some things which are easy to
> modify and some things that are hard to modify. Is this a problem introduced
> with the new system? I wasn't aware email addresses were obscured in the old
> one
Ken-
Friday, December 22, 2006, 7:08:47 PM, you wrote:
> Actually, that was in progress... I was working with Marcus on this, but
> someone "jumped the gun" and made it available before I had a chance to
> upgrade RevZilla. Now it's time for me to play catch-up...
Thanks. Good to know.
--
-Mar
Yup, there's a backlog.
You can view the definition of terms by clicking the "Status" and/or
"Resolution" label next to the field.
"Graham Samuel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Ignoring issues of syntax and general form, can we get back to some
> semantics? What
27;t been fixed from that previous change,
(just try and find downloadable engines or bugzilla or anything about
the educational market) and there are some broken links now
(newsletter archives, for example).
--
-Mark Wieder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
use-revolut
Mark,
> Note that a little javascript and a little unicode goes a long way.
One of the reason why the old BZ system stayed in the state it was for such
a long time were a number of "hacks" like that... Customizations that would
be lost or not compatible with later versions. Going forward, we're
Ignoring issues of syntax and general form, can we get back to some
semantics? What is the meaning of an 'unconfirmed' enhancement? I see
some very old enhancement requests are still unconfirmed in the
present list. IMHO enhancement requests should be given a target date
for review by RunRe
Stephen-
Of course you can always go to the Quality Center and register a new
special email address for the purpose of bug reporting.
--
-Mark Wieder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this
Bill-
> Would you please address the issue about exposed email addresses in
> the bug system? This more important to me than the quality of the new
> interface. If people get spammed for posting a bug, that is going to
> cut into the effectiveness of the bug reporting system if they don't
> want t
Entered as:
http://quality.runrev.com/qacenter/show_bug.cgi?id=4222
"Robert Brenstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Stephen,
>>
>>> Would you please address the issue about exposed email addresses in the
>>> bug system?
>>
>>I'll ask them to look into that. Th
sn't it a
little weird to be talking about it as if Ken (and RunRev) weren't in the
room? I suggest that we take this part of the discussion backchannel.
Sure there's a lot more that COULD be done with Bugzilla/Quality Control
Center. But it's my hope that we've made
Stephen,
Would you please address the issue about exposed email addresses in the
bug system?
I'll ask them to look into that. There are some things which are easy to
modify and some things that are hard to modify. Is this a problem introduced
with the new system? I wasn't aware email address
Stephen,
> Would you please address the issue about exposed email addresses in the
> bug system?
I'll ask them to look into that. There are some things which are easy to
modify and some things that are hard to modify. Is this a problem introduced
with the new system? I wasn't aware email addre
Bill,
Would you please address the issue about exposed email addresses in
the bug system? This more important to me than the quality of the new
interface. If people get spammed for posting a bug, that is going to
cut into the effectiveness of the bug reporting system if they don't
want to be
change the server to allow a
client like RevZilla. But as you saw, our change to the backend does require
a change to the client. Imagine if we were stuck with the old Bugzilla
because of an installed based of integrated Revzillas going back umpteen
versions of Revolution.
Any interface is an
Then there is the issue of updating client software when the reporting
system changes. No, there is requirement to change the server to allow a
client like RevZilla. But as you saw, our change to the backend does require
a change to the client. Imagine if we were stuck with the old Bugzill
Geir,
> Sorry Bill, don't take it personal. I just see a potential for all your
> work to become a hassle for me and maybe others when we want to report
> bugs or feature requests, and just wanted to let you know my opinion
> sooner rather than later. If you feel that your decisions are correct
On Dec 22, 2006, at 7:44 PM, Geir A. Myrestrand wrote:
I just see a potential for all your work to become a hassle for me
and maybe others when we want to report bugs or feature requests,
and just wanted to let you know my opinion sooner rather than
later. If you feel that your decisions ar
at is also more descriptive
of the actual function of the site. There's no reason that just because the
underlying technology is Bugzilla that it needs to be named as such.
Sorry if I was a bit too direct, I usually don't sugarcoat my
messages... :-)
It was just my personal opinion. F
and also, since it's not a web site, it naturally obfuscates email
addresses from the bots.
But MOST IMPORTANTLY, RevZilla is:
- an absolutely wonderful showpiece for how Revolution can
be used to make "Web 3.0" applications, completely replacing
a traditional browser client to provide the
Scott Rossi wrote:
Recently, Geir A. Myrestrand wrote:
Actually, the word "bugzilla" has been purged from the system as much as
possible. "Bugs" are now "Reports" in order to encompass both problems and
feature requests. The whole thing has been renamed "Qu
ve
of the actual function of the site. There's no reason that just because the
underlying technology is Bugzilla that it needs to be named as such.
We're also not "taking away" any feature; you've never been able to get to
the RunRev reporting site using the URL you sug
Yes, REV folks please fix this right away my special REV address
gets enough spam as it is (probably 5-6 per day, without any known
public sites showing. With the Bug site (sorry, QC site), it's likely
to skyrocket. PLEASE fix this, the spambots are on the way. It might
even be too late.
Bill-
Friday, December 22, 2006, 4:55:14 PM, you wrote:
> http://quality.runrev.com
I am particularly liking:
"Quality Control Center would like to put a random quip here, but no
one has entered any."
Unfortunately, "No new entries may be submitted at this time".
http://quality.runrev.com/qac
On 12/22/06 8:10 PM, "Mark Wieder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And happier yet if someone had given Ken a heads-up so that a RevZilla
> update could have been concurrent with the backend change.
Actually, that was in progress... I was working with Marcus on this, but
someone "jumped the gun" and
Mark Wieder wrote:
...
And happier yet if someone had given Ken a heads-up so that a RevZilla
update could have been concurrent with the backend change.
RevZilla is:
- more usable than the Web interface
- directly integrated within the IDE workspace, making it
much more convenient
- more a
Recently, Geir A. Myrestrand wrote:
>> Actually, the word "bugzilla" has been purged from the system as much as
>> possible. "Bugs" are now "Reports" in order to encompass both problems and
>> feature requests. The whole thing has been renamed &q
Bill Marriott wrote:
"quality" is shorter!
:D
I think this is a mistake, but I will rest my case against your hostname
for Bugzilla. I currently have access to 23 Bugzilla systems, yours is
the only one I can not reach via the hostname Bugzilla...
Actually, the word "bug
Bill-
Friday, December 22, 2006, 4:55:14 PM, you wrote:
> http://quality.runrev.com
Nice look. I'd be even happier if the email addresses were obfuscated
instead of there in plain text.
And happier yet if someone had given Ken a heads-up so that a RevZilla
update could have been concurrent with
My first impression is that it works very well, including redirection
of show_bug cgi script. Thanks!
Mark
--
Economy-x-Talk
Consultancy and Software Engineering
http://economy-x-talk.com
http://www.salery.biz
Get your store on-line within minutes with Salery Web Store software.
Download a
Looks like the password is finally gone. The new Quality Control Center is
live now at both the old address and the new one:
http://quality.runrev.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to subscribe
Hi,
Quality control centre, please make sure that the Bugzilla pages
automatically redirect to the correct page of the new system. I am
sure it is also possible to redirect addresses like http://
support.runrev.com/bugzilla/bugzilla.php/show_bug.cgi?id=1234 to
something like http
so it isn't me!!
sqb
... which you would be able to see if it weren't password-locked!
--
stephen barncard
s a n f r a n c i s c o
- - - - - - - - - - - -
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Please visit this url to sub
Yup. Looks like I either spoke too soon or children were being microwaved.
The password screen you're getting is the general lockout; bugzilla
credentials won't work with it.
Looking into what can be done (but as it's 8pm Friday in the UK, don't hold
your breath).
"S
"quality" is shorter!
:D
Actually, the word "bugzilla" has been purged from the system as much as
possible. "Bugs" are now "Reports" in order to encompass both problems and
feature requests. The whole thing has been renamed "Quality Control
Cente
there seems to be a password problem with BZ, at least with the
current system, using the password I've always used.
sqb
--
stephen barncard
s a n f r a n c i s c o
- - - - - - - - - - - -
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev
Bill Marriott wrote:
I'll be putting together a more formal announcement but I wanted to get this
out to you quickly.
Go to http://quality.runrev.com
Here you'll find the new "Revolution Quality Control Center" which is the
replacement for Bugzilla. All your accounts/log
I'll be putting together a more formal announcement but I wanted to get this
out to you quickly.
Go to http://quality.runrev.com
Here you'll find the new "Revolution Quality Control Center" which is the
replacement for Bugzilla. All your accounts/logins should work, and
On 12/22/06 11:21 AM, "Tereza Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suppose Runtime Revolution will make an announcement soon, but I
> discovered that between yesterday and today, Rev's Bugzilla webpage
> has been replaced with an announcement of improvements to
Tereza-
Friday, December 22, 2006, 9:21:09 AM, you wrote:
> I suppose Runtime Revolution will make an announcement soon, but I
> discovered that between yesterday and today, Rev's Bugzilla webpage
> has been replaced with an announcement of improvements to come in the
>
Bugzilla? What's that?
"Tereza Snyder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I suppose Runtime Revolution will make an announcement soon, but I
>discovered that between yesterday and today, Rev's Bugzilla webpage has
>been replaced w
I suppose Runtime Revolution will make an announcement soon, but I
discovered that between yesterday and today, Rev's Bugzilla webpage
has been replaced with an announcement of improvements to come in the
new year. Ken's Revzilla can't find its info - so all its buttons are
On 11/11/06 12:59 PM, "chris bohnert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You might want to be careful about not creating extra support issues with
> this. Port 80 is pretty much the universally accepted indicator of
> "Internet Access". To expect users to have access to port 3306 or even be
> aware th
source of
confusion.
--
cb
On 11/11/06, Ken Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/11/06 3:48 AM, "Bill Marriott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
> Bugzilla is built on top of MySQL. In fact, there's an explicit
attachments
> table that you should be able
On 11/11/06 3:48 AM, "Bill Marriott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Ken,
>
> Bugzilla is built on top of MySQL. In fact, there's an explicit attachments
> table that you should be able to write to fairly easily.
>
> But, poking around in Revzilla, it
Hi Ken,
Bugzilla is built on top of MySQL. In fact, there's an explicit attachments
table that you should be able to write to fairly easily.
But, poking around in Revzilla, it seems that you're interacting with the
HTML pages. Wouldn't it theoretically be a lot faster and mo
Jim Ault wrote:
It would be nice if there was a wiki that would categorize bugs
(text-in-fields, icons, standalones, Win32 vs Mac) that would read more like
a book or simple outline.
You mean, like http://revdocwiki.wikispaces.com/ ?
Jerry Muelver
_
Morning All,
It occurs to me that, to be the kind of conscientious Revolutionist I
descried in Re: On the Democratic Operation of Bugzilla, I must
essentially revisit all items that have my votes, review all
outstanding items in BZ, reallocate my existing votes, and allocate the
majority of
ccess the bug reports? While most people seem to value the
chance to point out problems and influence future versions, some
people regard a public bug list as an admission of failure. Maybe it
would be better to restrict bugzilla to members of the improve-rev
list or make it by invitation only
Since I started this conversation, I figured i ought to jump back in.
In no way do I think Rev should do way with Bugzilla. Publicly
disclosing bugs is useful. And it lends an air of credibility to one's
products that is hard to attain any other way. Getting the community's
input on
Dan, et al:
Voting says "This is my relative (among outstanding bugs) priority for
fixing the bug."
Consider voting as contributing to a proposed budget for RRLtd's R&D +
Support:
RRLtd gives you the opportunity to distribute $100 [ie 100 votes] among
all the outstanding bug reports and e
processor should be simple, but
they still crash :-)
I wonder is the Rev team doing itself a disservice by letting all Rev
users access the bug reports? While most people seem to value the
chance to point out problems and influence future versions, some
people regard a public bug list as an admissi
ugs? Their problem is not that they
are too customer-driven with BZ, it is contrarily that it is damned
hard to get some decent customer input. Even Dan, who is as
experienced as anyone, confesses that he does not get motivated to
use Bugzilla. Criticality, or priority, does matter. I
this list), but I do
appreciate your thoughtful analogy. It falls short of our Bugzilla
deal, though.
Thomas J McGrath III
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lazy River Software™ - http://www.lazyriversoftware.com
Lazy River Metal Art™ - http://www.lazyriversoftware.com/metal.html
Meeting We
Rob
Fair enough. I hadn't considered that scenario. I stand corrected.
On 2/23/06, Rob Cozens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan, et al:
>
> > If I create a new bug entry in Bugzilla, it would not even occur to me
> > to vote for it. By posting it and givi
Garrett.
I've spent the better part of my adult life in the software biz and I
think your reaction here was really, really extreme. You said:
"You don't release
products if you know it still contains bugs! You don't upgrade your
product unless the upgrade fixes all the prior bugs."
I don't
Hello Tom,
Actually, I couldn't make a balance sheet balance for the life of me
(no offence to any accountants on this list), but I do appreciate
your thoughtful analogy. It falls short of our Bugzilla deal,
though. Accountants receive disparate (not desperate; that would be
Norte
untime for the product.
RR bug reports are directly given to the company by posting a report in
the Bugzilla database... preferably after checking to see if the
problem has been previously reported. The information recorded [except
votes] is the same information that would be asked of you i
> Lingo went to c.dot.syntax.hell in a very short fashion...
> Please don't let Transcript follow behind Lingo!
I'm sure I wouldn't want to ask RR to make Rev use
dot notation - but it's a nice way to work when you
are used to it. ;-)
Scott
___
us
Here, here!
I agree wholeheartedly, Rob.
I mean, y'all know that I have and will likely continue to do more than
my own fair share of kvetching...
But I also have to say that I have seen responsiveness on most if not all
of the issues I kvetch about most:
*Reasonable "hobbyist"/IU/educational p
Is there any place where the known XP bugs are available for 2.7?
I'd forgotten that I was supposed to be thinking about things my students
might encounter, not just those things I would (in OS X), but I had one of
the brighter students today showing me wonky Rev stuff in XP.
NOTE: I also know t
Hi Garrett,
> I guess I'm not specifically upset with the bug issue, but with
> several issues. My views of how things should be are not
> that of the
> majority. I can be extreme in my views about products should
> be free
> of bugs and such. And usually "you get what you pay for"
>
among them.
Until you and I individually commit to do so, the potential of Bugzilla
is largely untapped and unknown.
Rob Cozens
CCW, Serendipity Software Company
"And I, which was two fooles, do so grow three;
Who are a little wise, the best fooles bee."
from "The Triple Foole&
Dan, et al:
If I create a new bug entry in Bugzilla, it would not even occur to me
to vote for it. By posting it and giving it a rating, I think I *am*
voting on it.
I find posting and voting have totally different purposes.
Example: The last item I posted to BZ had to do with rectangle
. I probably would have fired the alpha testing team and the
beta testing team, as well as the person who's let the product go to
market knowing there were unfixed bugs in it.
Jim begins "I don't use Bug or Revzilla." and ends "Bugzilla is not
useful for me." D
And it seems to me that all problems in the world, big and small,
should be fixed, and a simple word to the Whitehouse people should be
enough to get the ball rolling.
:)
Mark
On 24 Feb 2006, at 00:38, Gregory Lypny wrote:
Seems to me that all bugs, big and small, should to be fixed, and
thought the analogy would be close your heart)
Regards,
Tom
On Feb 23, 2006, at 7:38 PM, Gregory Lypny wrote:
Well put, Dan.
But I don't see the point of Bugzilla at all. Seems to me that all
bugs, big and small, should to be fixed, and a simple word to the
Revolution people ought to
Well put, Dan.
But I don't see the point of Bugzilla at all. Seems to me that all
bugs, big and small, should to be fixed, and a simple word to the
Revolution people ought to be enough to get the ball rolling.
Gregory Lypny
Associate Professor of Finance
Garrett Hylltun wrote:
On Feb 23, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Dan Shafer wrote:
This provided me with an opportunity to say something I've been
meaning to say for some time but never had a "trigger" for.
Ditto!
Yeah - I tried to respond to Sarah's email saying more or less the same
thing, but jus
Garrett, Dan, Jim, et al:
I can understand setting priorities depending on the severity of the
bug, but having the users rate and vote? I thought I was purchasing a
product, not getting married to a second wife! Bugzilla seems like it
relies far too much on the users and not enough on the
> While I am absolutely certain that RR doesn't rely solely or
> even primarily on Bugzilla to set its bug-fixing agenda, I am
> equally sure they do take it into account. And that's a shame
> because the reality is that the number of people who use Rev
> regula
Garrett Hylltun wrote:
I'm sorry for being a bit over the edge, but I've been in this business
myself, and this really makes me mad. You don't release products if you
know it still contains bugs! You don't upgrade your product unless the
upgrade fixes all the prior bugs.
How many known bugs
hat any
bug report sent to them would be taken seriously and that it would
be actively followed up by the company. I can understand setting
priorities depending on the severity of the bug, but having the
users rate and vote? I thought I was purchasing a product, not
getting married to
would be taken seriously and that it would be
actively followed up by the company. I can understand setting
priorities depending on the severity of the bug, but having the users
rate and vote? I thought I was purchasing a product, not getting
married to a second wife! Bugzilla seems like it
I would also like to point out that 2.7 no longer contains a link to
Bugzilla. The support option in Help (on Windows) goes to
http://support.runrev.com/ which does not have a link to
http://support.runrev.com/bugzilla/, so there isn't even a good way to get
to bugzilla without using the
On 2/23/06 11:07 AM, "Dan Shafer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd be all for making Bugzilla far more useful. I even have some ideas
> for how to do that. But frankly that's up to RunRev, not the
> community, and my guess is that they have enough To Do Lists th
In another thread, Sarah Reichelt made the following observations
about Bugzilla in response to Xavier's complaints about stability of
2.7 on WinXP:
> I have looked at your list of reported bugs in Bugzilla. I find 126
> unfixed bugs reported by you (though some seem to be duplicates
Walton, et al:
Please post your bugzilla (
http://support.runrev.com/bugdatabase/ ) number when you have it.
Tablet PC compliance is bugzilla #3252, and has five votes from moi.
I agree that Rev seems unique in not supporting the tablet very well, and
that tablets and Rev should have a
t
> the 5 million files i need to classify quick and dirty?
>
> Without web, your cool gui is in a box! Of course, the licensing
> is gonna be different in Kevin's eye - one more license to profit.
>
> > out of 150+ outstanding bugzillas, Mark, above all nee
#x27;s clients had 3X more clients? (i know 3X is not relativistic but...)
out of 150+ outstanding bugzillas, Mark, above all needs the biggest
applause though! I see the right dedication to making rev great and
his bugzilla feedback is quite speedy. Hip Hip...
regards,
Xavier
http://monsieurx.com
I was delighted to see some of my bugs had feedback, including one that was
my misunderstanding of how revSetStackFileProfile works with the modal command.
Way to go RunRev!
At 11:59 AM 8/11/2005, you wrote:
I just thought I'd let the sceptics know that Bugzilla (aka Rev
engineering &
I just thought I'd let the sceptics know that Bugzilla (aka Rev engineering
& support) REALLY works!! Now saying that may indicate that I was a sceptic
too, well maybe ;-)
After posting [Bug 2931] "Wrong/Omitted Revolution version number" a very
short time time ag
Wow, yes, RevZilla is very cool indeed. Thanks!
Charles
On Jul 26, 2005, at 11:45 PM, Ken Ray wrote:
On 7/26/05 7:09 PM, "Charles Hartman"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anybody else have a problem searching the bugzilla using Safari?
Whenever I try I get an error mes
You can't search Bugzilla in Safari. Use Firefox instead.
Devin
On Jul 26, 2005, at 6:09 PM, Charles Hartman wrote:
Does anybody else have a problem searching the bugzilla using
Safari? Whenever I try I get an error message saying that "The page
you opened redirected you to a
On 7/26/05 7:09 PM, "Charles Hartman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anybody else have a problem searching the bugzilla using Safari?
> Whenever I try I get an error message saying that "The page you
> opened redirected you to a page that isn't supported b
Does anybody else have a problem searching the bugzilla using
Safari? Whenever I try I get an error message saying that "The page
you opened redirected you to a page that isn't supported by Safari."
It adds, "Safari can't open the page because it cannot
redirect t
Does anybody else have a problem searching the bugzilla using Safari?
Whenever I try I get an error message saying that "The page you
opened redirected you to a page that isn't supported by Safari." It
adds, "Safari can't open the page because it cannot
redirect t
Hi all,
List traffic increases each day.
Many posts end in a "bugzilla it" (between 1 and 5 each day...)
As if Bugzilla was the panacea :-)
Overloading Bugzilla is not efficient for all of us and Runrev guys
either.
I have some experience with Rev and I found out many times that t
Every time, but every time i got to bugzilla, i have to:
- relogin
- reconfirm my password each time i: search or submit a new bug, or save a
new bug, or change a bug, or anything...
This is in FireFox on Windows 2000-3. I've reset all my cookies. I dont
remember explorer being more better
Hi Peter,
You can now enter 2.6 as a version in bugzilla.
Warmest Regards,
Mark.
--
Mark Waddingham ~ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ http://www.runrev.com
Runtime Revolution ~ User-Centric Development Tools
2.6 needs to be added to bugzilla. I was going to enter a bug, but I can't.
If you close and remove a stack from memory, the Application Browser pops
up if you don't have it open.
Peter T. Evensen
http://www.PetersRoadToHealth.com
24-hour recorded info hotline: 1-80
http://support.runrev.com/bugdatabase/
Bugzilla can also be accessed via Revzilla, a stack written in runrev
by Ken Ray:
http://sonsothunder.com/devres/revolution/downloads/RevZilla/
RevZilla202.zip
On May 11 2005, at 20:06, John Ridge wrote:
I'd be very grateful if someone could help
1 - 100 of 238 matches
Mail list logo
