On 12/10/05 11:03 PM, "Thomas McGrath III" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ken,
> It didn't used to do this??? What version did Rev start Re-inserting
> after a delete?
Every version AFAIK... drag a button to a card, open the script (see the
mouseUP handler), select it all, hit enter twice to apply
Ken,
It didn't used to do this??? What version did Rev start Re-inserting
after a delete?
I had to write a script that went and deleted the mouseUp scripts in
my stack. And when I checked they were all gone. This was about two
upgraded versions ago.
Tom
On Dec 10, 2005, at 9:55 PM, Ken
Ken Ray wrote:
I think my problem is that if I open a
button's script, and then delete the mouseup handler, then close the script
and reopen it, the mouseup handler has been reinserted. If the IDE would
honor my choice to remove the script of the object and not reinsert the
handler, I would be sa
On 12/10/05 6:00 PM, "Björnke von Gierke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 10 2005, at 21:45, Ken Ray wrote:
>
>> Personally, I really dislike the fact that the IDE inserts *anything*
>> into
>> my scripts.
>
> I strongly disagree with that.
You disagree with the fact that *I* dislike the ID
On 12/10/05 6:13 PM, "Jim Ault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/10/05 4:00 PM, "Björnke von Gierke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Dec 10 2005, at 21:45, Ken Ray wrote:
>>> Personally, I really dislike the fact that the IDE inserts *anything*
>>> into
>>> my scripts.
>> I strongly disagree wi
On 12/10/05 4:00 PM, "Björnke von Gierke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 10 2005, at 21:45, Ken Ray wrote:
>> Personally, I really dislike the fact that the IDE inserts *anything*
>> into
>> my scripts.
> I strongly disagree with that. Hypercard did it, and for a good reason:
> It's extremely
On Dec 10 2005, at 21:45, Ken Ray wrote:
Personally, I really dislike the fact that the IDE inserts *anything*
into
my scripts.
I strongly disagree with that. Hypercard did it, and for a good reason:
It's extremely newbie friendly. Also 99% of my buttons have a mouseUp
handler.
BvG
--
o
On 12/10/05 1:40 PM, "Scott Rossi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Recently, Roger Guay wrote:
>
>> I was looking at the card script of your wonderful abacus stack, and
>> wondered how the mouseUp gets passed to the card since each abacus
>> element has an empty moueUp handler in it???
>
> In reali
Recently, Ken Ray wrote:
> Scott, you might want to consider at some point putting together some short
> tutorials on how to make interface elements like you create, and how to use
> them in Rev.
I'm on it. :-)
Regards,
Scott Rossi
Creative Director
Tactile Media, Multimedia & Design
-
E: [
On 12/10/05 9:10 AM, "Jim Hurley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd give my soul to be able to make these graphics.
Scott, you might want to consider at some point putting together some short
tutorials on how to make interface elements like you create, and how to use
them in Rev. I know there are
Hi Roger,
As you have been, I have been amazed to see many years ago :-) empty
scripts in a stack written by Frederic Rinaldi (called FreDOS’Stack:
some of you will remember...)
And I learned... how to never repeat a line of code in my own stacks.
It's what did Scott:
on mouseUp
if "peg"
Recently, Roger Guay wrote:
> I was looking at the card script of your wonderful abacus stack, and
> wondered how the mouseUp gets passed to the card since each abacus
> element has an empty moueUp handler in it???
In reality, the controls have *no* scripts within them. The empty mouseUp
handler
Dec 2005 07:10:45 -0800
From: Jim Hurley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Can I do "show through" graphic regions...
To: use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Scott Ros
Scott Rossi wrote:
Hi Andy:
How can anyone resist a GUI challenge?...
OK, I'm not sure if I did what you're asking, but I took a stab at this, and
spent way to much time figuring out the math (this was a good exercise for
me in efficient scripting). I think it works as an abacus should but the
Recently, Andy wrote:
> I want to design a Chinese abacus. I'd like the background not covered by
> the beads, rods, reckoning bar and frame to show though.
>
> Maybe this isn't accepted GUI design so I may change it around but I'd like
> to see if it works anyhow.
>
> Any hints??
Hi Andy:
How
Hi Andy,
I want to design a Chinese abacus. I'd like the background not covered by
the beads, rods, reckoning bar and frame to show though.
[snip]
Any hints??
Create an image of the frame, rods, & reckoning bar with the rest of
the image transparent.
Group that image with buttons or imag
I want to design a Chinese abacus. I'd like the background not covered by
the beads, rods, reckoning bar and frame to show though.
Maybe this isn't accepted GUI design so I may change it around but I'd like
to see if it works anyhow.
Any hints??
Thanks for any breadcrumbs,
Andy
___
17 matches
Mail list logo
