On May 6, 2005, at 11:44 AM, Richard Gaskin wrote:
Dennis Brown wrote:
This brings up a good point that has been bugging me for years.
It is ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS that the Rev documentation built in
to the IDE is so full of errors. How many repeat questions and
confusion by folks trying
Brian,
This brings up a good point that has been bugging me for years. It
is ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS that the Rev documentation built in to the
IDE is so full of errors. How many repeat questions and confusion by
folks trying to learn Rev are the result of wrong or missing
documentation.
Dennis Brown wrote:
Stupid Doc errors AND small bugs in the IDE that are ignored (because
GOOD programmers can find an undocumented workaround) make a bad
impression about the quality of Revolution.
I agree. I tried fixing errors or problems way back when using MetaCard
and when RunRev first
[I am resending this message, because it seems to have been lost in
the mail]
Brian,
This brings up a good point that has been bugging me for years. It
is ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS that the Rev documentation built in to the
IDE is so full of errors. How many repeat questions and confusion by
Wow, that was weird. The new Tiger mail.app suddenly decided that
mail from me or on this subject was Junk. I found my message and
responses along with several good messages in my junk mail folder
just now. Sorry for the resend. Tiger users, watch you junk mailbox.
Dennis
On May 6,
Dennis Brown wrote:
This brings up a good point that has been bugging me for years. It is
ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS that the Rev documentation built in to the IDE is
so full of errors. How many repeat questions and confusion by folks
trying to learn Rev are the result of wrong or missing
