RE: Equivalence to the SuperCard function call "via" object

2003-07-09 Thread Joël Guillod
> [...] So the script that works is > this: > > on mouseUp > put "Hello Ken Ray" into tMyVar > put "Goodbye" into tAnotherVar > answer value("getSomeData(1,the date," & q(tMyVar)& "," & > q(tAnotherVar) & ")",btn 2) > end mouseUp > > function q what > return quote & what & quote > end q > > Don't

RE: Equivalence to the SuperCard function call "via" object

2003-07-09 Thread Joeri Paeleman
Hi, This was the script which gave an error: on mouseUp put "Hello Ken Ray" into tMyVar -- HERE IS THE MODIFICATION ! put "Goodbye" into tAnotherVar answer value("getSomeData(1,the date," & tMyVar & "," & tAnotherVar &")",btn 2) end mouseUp I think the problem lies in "Hello Ken Ray",

RE: Equivalence to the SuperCard function call "via" object

2003-07-08 Thread Ken Ray
Joel, My point exactly is that it runs like "do", which means that if you need to put quotes around multiword items. In fact it's probably useful to quote all variables that are being passed. So the script that works is this: on mouseUp put "Hello Ken Ray" into tMyVar put "Goodbye" into tAnot

Re: Equivalence to the SuperCard function call "via" object

2003-07-08 Thread Dar Scott
On Tuesday, July 8, 2003, at 02:08 AM, Joël Guillod wrote: I suggest to stop this thread discussion because there is no simple implementation. Several people have asked just what you want to do. You would likely find a good response if you describe that. To get information back from an object I

Re: Equivalence to the SuperCard function call "via" object

2003-07-08 Thread Richard Gaskin
Joël Guillod wrote: > Thanks for the idea Ken but no this does not help! > > Yes, just try your scripts with: > > on mouseUp > put "Hello Ken Ray" into tMyVar -- HERE IS THE MODIFICATION ! > put "Goodbye" into tAnotherVar > answer value("getSomeData(1,the date," & tMyVar & "," & tAnother

RE: Equivalence to the SuperCard function call "via" object

2003-07-08 Thread Joël Guillod
tton id 1003 of card id 1002 of stack "Untitled 1" I suggest to stop this thread discussion because there is no simple implementation. I will use the call instruction and request a new feature... Joel > From: "Ken Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTEC

RE: Equivalence to the SuperCard function call "via" object

2003-07-07 Thread Ken Ray
amp;"-ing them as in my example above. Does this help? Ken Ray Sons of Thunder Software Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web Site: http://www.sonsothunder.com/ > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Joël Guillod > Sent: Mo

RE: Equivalence to the SuperCard function call "via" object

2003-07-07 Thread Chipp Walters
ECTED] > Subject: Re: Equivalence to the SuperCard function call "via" object > > > I am trying to do what Supercard do with the function...via. That > is I want > that the function is evaluated by the script of the specified object. > > E.g.: > > In Supercard you ca

Re: Equivalence to the SuperCard function call "via" object

2003-07-07 Thread Richard Gaskin
Joël Guillod wrote: > -- does not work or dont give the expected result: > get value("getSomeData(1,the date,tMyVar,tAnOtherVar)", \ > btn "MyButton" of cd 10 of stack "someStack") > put it into tMyResult What is the desired result? -- Richard Gaskin Fourth World Media Corporation Developer

Re: Equivalence to the SuperCard function call "via" object

2003-07-07 Thread Joël Guillod
via object" a feature for the wish list? Or did I miss something? Joel > Message: 9 > Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 06:40:44 -0700 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: "Jeanne A. E. DeVoto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Equivalence to the SuperCard function call &

Re: Equivalence to the SuperCard function call "via" object

2003-07-05 Thread Jeanne A. E. DeVoto
At 1:30 AM -0700 7/5/03, Joël Guillod wrote: >>> Is there an equivalent to the following Supercard statement? >>> >>> functionName([paramList]) via object > >YES I did but it does not behave as described in the docs, only the "me" >keyword is related to the optional object param. What exactly are

Re: Equivalence to the SuperCard function call "via" object

2003-07-05 Thread Richard Gaskin
Joël Guillod wrote: >>> Is there an equivalent to the following Supercard statement? >>> >>> functionName([paramList]) via object >>> >>> I tried the "value()", "send", "call", "do" expressions in RR but do not get >>> the intended results. >> >> The "value" function has an optional object para

Re: Equivalence to the SuperCard function call "via" object

2003-07-05 Thread Joël Guillod
>> Is there an equivalent to the following Supercard statement? >> >> functionName([paramList]) via object >> >> I tried the "value()", "send", "call", "do" expressions in RR but do not get >> the intended results. > > The "value" function has an optional object param which lets it behave like >

Re: Equivalence to the SuperCard function call "via" object

2003-07-04 Thread Richard Gaskin
Joël Guillod wrote: > Is there an equivalent to the following Supercard statement? > > functionName([paramList]) via object > > I tried the "value()", "send", "call", "do" expressions in RR but do not get > the intended results. The "value" function has an optional object param which lets it be

Equivalence to the SuperCard function call "via" object

2003-07-03 Thread Joël Guillod
Is there an equivalent to the following Supercard statement? functionName([paramList]) via object I tried the "value()", "send", "call", "do" expressions in RR but do not get the intended results. Joel ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECT