Re: Palette mystery

2006-02-19 Thread Graham Samuel
On Sat, 18 Feb 2006 11:01:43 -0800, Scott Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Recently, Graham Samuel wrote: I've got three stacks, let's say stack 'A' whose style is topLevel, and stacks 'B' and 'C' whose style is palette. The global property raisepalettes is true, but despite this, if I click

Re: Palette mystery

2006-02-19 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, Graham Samuel wrote: I've got three stacks, let's say stack 'A' whose style is topLevel, and stacks 'B' and 'C' whose style is palette. The global property raisepalettes is true, but despite this, if I click on 'A', it moves in front of 'B' and 'C'. Something else is probably

Re: Palette mystery

2006-02-19 Thread sims
At 12:25 AM -0800 2/19/06, Scott Rossi wrote: I would suggest that whenever you experience what you perceive to be a topLevel stack displaying above a palette, immediate query the stack modes in the message box and see what the result is. Something like: put short name of stack 'A' mode of

Re: Palette mystery

2006-02-19 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, sims wrote: Set the systemWIndow to true will make a topLevel stack display above a palette window. Good point, but even though the mode continues to return 1, the stack has the *appearance* of a palette, so again, it seems unlikely that this is what is going on. (Of course, if you

Re: Palette mystery

2006-02-19 Thread Jean-Paul Poccard
Le 18 févr. 06, à 23:21, Scott Rossi a écrit : Recently, Graham Samuel wrote: I've got three stacks, let's say stack 'A' whose style is topLevel, and stacks 'B' and 'C' whose style is palette. The global property raisepalettes is true, but despite this, if I click on 'A', it moves in front

Re: Palette mystery

2006-02-19 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, Jean-Paul Poccard wrote: My stack worked as expected with RR 2.6, the substacks which had to be displayed as palettes were never hidden by the topstack. Now, even if I remind via the message the stacks of displaying as toplevel (the mainstack) or as palettes (the substacks), a

Re: Palette mystery

2006-02-19 Thread Graham Samuel
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 00:25:07 -0800, Scott Rossi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... You say that it's not impossible for a toplevel stack to appear above a palette stack - can you give any more detail on this? I see nothing in the RR docs. There is nothing in the RR docs that I know of. My

Rép : Palette mystery -solved for me

2006-02-19 Thread Jean-Paul Poccard
Le 19 févr. 06, à 19:00, Scott Rossi a écrit : Recently, Jean-Paul Poccard wrote: My stack worked as expected with RR 2.6, the substacks which had to be displayed as palettes were never hidden by the topstack. Now, even if I remind via the message the stacks of displaying as toplevel (the

Palette mystery

2006-02-18 Thread Graham Samuel
I've got three stacks, let's say stack 'A' whose style is topLevel, and stacks 'B' and 'C' whose style is palette. The global property raisepalettes is true, but despite this, if I click on 'A', it moves in front of 'B' and 'C'. I tried setting 'A' to modeless, which would work with my app

Re: Palette mystery

2006-02-18 Thread Scott Rossi
Recently, Graham Samuel wrote: I've got three stacks, let's say stack 'A' whose style is topLevel, and stacks 'B' and 'C' whose style is palette. The global property raisepalettes is true, but despite this, if I click on 'A', it moves in front of 'B' and 'C'. Something else is probably going