I seem to have the uncanny ability to break anything... the MIDA$
touch. I cannot download the MetaCard IDE successfully.
The message Sorry, but this version of the IDE requires engine
=3.x! appears. My version of Rev is 2.8.1 build 470. Any suggestions?
Ryno.
On 16/12/2009 11:48, Ryno Swart wrote:
I seem to have the uncanny ability to break anything... the MIDA$
touch. I cannot download the MetaCard IDE successfully.
The message Sorry, but this version of the IDE requires engine
=3.x! appears. My version of Rev is 2.8.1 build 470. Any suggestions?
Jacqueline
Thanks for making this such an easy install. I really am most
grateful to the people who've kept this alive. I'd reached the end of
my tether trying to use Rev 3.5 and 4.0 on Linux.
At least the Metacard IDE works about 98% of the way. There are still
some visual defects, but alas
Bernard Devlin wrote:
Jacqueline
Thanks for making this such an easy install. I really am most
grateful to the people who've kept this alive. I'd reached the end of
my tether trying to use Rev 3.5 and 4.0 on Linux.
At least the Metacard IDE works about 98% of the way. There are still
some
It's good to see the Metacard IDE mentioned here. While someone
accustomed to Rev might initially be underwhelmed by its simplicity,
that same simplicity can make your programming so much more
productive.
The Rev IDE has its honor points and I do occasionally launch it, but
the MC IDE is
What is the control browser? Never seen it...
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Wilhelm Sanke sa...@hrz.uni-kassel.dewrote:
I do not care too much how the historical icons look, what I care about is
the functionality of the Metacard IDE. Above all I like the quickly
accessible Control Browser,
Wilhelm Sanke wrote:
I do not care too much how the historical icons look, what I care about
is the functionality of the Metacard IDE. Above all I like the quickly
accessible Control Browser, which is my main tool during programming.
I like MC's control browser too. Sometimes I only want to
Andre Garzia wrote:
What is the control browser? Never seen it...
In the MC IDE, choose Control Browser from the Tools menu. You will see
a list of objects on the current card. You can quickly change the
layering order from there, click a button to edit any object script, or
double-click to
Andre Garzia wrote:
What is the control browser? Never seen it...
In the MC IDE, choose Control Browser from the Tools menu. You will see
a list of objects on the current card. You can quickly change the
layering order from there, click a button to edit any object script, or
double-click to
David,
I think they have a Yahoo! group where you can download it but the address
of the group is unknown to me right now.
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:15 PM, D.Coker davidoco...@gmail.com wrote:
Andre Garzia wrote:
What is the control browser? Never seen it...
In the MC IDE, choose Control
D.Coker wrote:
I remember trying/using the MC IDE way back before Rev and would like
to have another look for those very reasons expressed. Is there a
place that one can still download it for use with the current version
of Rev?
In RevOnline (in Rev's toolbar) search for the MetaCard Setup
In RevOnline (in Rev's toolbar) search for the MetaCard Setup stack.
This will download the latest MC IDE and set it up with your (licensed)
Rev engine, ready to go. It's all one click.
Cool beans... I'll give it a try.
Thank you Jacque!
___
On 16/12/2009 00:20, D.Coker wrote:
In RevOnline (in Rev's toolbar) search for the MetaCard Setup stack.
This will download the latest MC IDE and set it up with your (licensed)
Rev engine, ready to go. It's all one click.
Cool beans... I'll give it a try.
Thank you Jacque!
In RevOnline (in Rev's toolbar) search for the MetaCard Setup stack.
This will download the latest MC IDE and set it up with your (licensed)
Rev engine, ready to go. It's all one click.
Again I'll say thanks!
It works like a charm and everything is just as I remember it. About all I can
see that
D.Coker wrote:
In RevOnline (in Rev's toolbar) search for the MetaCard Setup
stack. This will download the latest MC IDE and set it up with your
(licensed) Rev engine, ready to go. It's all one click.
Again I'll say thanks! It works like a charm and everything is just
as I remember it. About
stephen barncard wrote:
It's also prettier than the MC IDE.
Jacqueline Landman Gay
Anything is prettier than the MC IDE. The bottom of my parrot cage is
prettier than the MC IDE. ;)
I use MC. After 10 years I'm kinda used to it. Pretty? I have been known to
decorate the IDE with images of
Hugh Senior wrote:
stephen barncard wrote:
It's also prettier than the MC IDE.
Jacqueline Landman Gay
Anything is prettier than the MC IDE. The bottom of my parrot cage is
prettier than the MC IDE. ;)
I use MC. After 10 years I'm kinda used to it. Pretty? I have been known to
decorate
On 14 Dec 2009, at 01:55, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Anything is prettier than the MC IDE.
It used to be that way. At one time, it was a purist's dream. The rot set in
about 1999 when the image icon was upgraded from something that looked like a
wire pan scourer to something else. That blatant
Dave Cragg wrote:
On 14 Dec 2009, at 01:55, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Anything is prettier than the MC IDE.
It used to be that way. At one time, it was a purist's dream. The rot
set in about 1999 when the image icon was upgraded from something
that looked like a wire pan scourer to something
Recently, Jacque Landman Gay wrote:
That blatant
pandering to creative types was the thin end of the wedge. Within
three years, even the splash screen was upgraded.
I blame the parents.
Blame Scott Rossi, he did it. Them artist types, you just can't please 'em.
Keep it up, Landman Gay,
Scott Rossi wrote:
Recently, Jacque Landman Gay wrote:
That blatant
pandering to creative types was the thin end of the wedge. Within
three years, even the splash screen was upgraded.
I blame the parents.
Blame Scott Rossi, he did it. Them artist types, you just can't please 'em.
Keep it
On 14 Dec 2009, at 01:55, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Anything is prettier than the MC IDE.
I remember that we used to refer to its interface as spartan when
comparing to Rev IDE in its earlier days...
Robert
___
use-revolution mailing list
I use it because it's a lot less cranky, it stays out of the way, and
it doesn't clutter my screen. Plus I prefer the Control Browser.
Much easier to see what's where.
Shari
--
Critters, humor, patriots and sports t-shirts
http://www.villagetshirts.com
WlND0WS and MAClNT0SH shareware
I remember thinking (and probably even staying rather loudly) that its UI
elements (icons) looked like they were done by a 5 year old on acid...
Judy
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Robert Brenstein wrote:
On 14 Dec 2009, at 01:55, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Anything is prettier than the MC IDE.
I
make that, saying...
g.
Judy
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Judy Perry wrote:
I remember thinking (and probably even staying rather loudly) that its UI
elements (icons) looked like they were done by a 5 year old on acid...
Judy
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009, Robert Brenstein wrote:
On 14 Dec 2009,
On 2009-12-13, at 11:00 AM, use-revolution-requ...@lists.runrev.com wrote:
Can someone give me a quick summary of why I might want to use the
MetaCard IDE instead
of RunRev's? It seems that a lot of users of this group use MC. Is it
just what you were used
to or is there some feature
Speaking of IDEs, Jerry's tRev is kind of a 'remote' IDE with his little
agents running around. I found out about another 'feature' that was there
from the beginning.
When your stack or Rev crashes, tRev stays running and doesn't freak out.
It just sits there, with your current scripts. So you
stephen barncard wrote:
It's also prettier than the MC IDE.
Anything is prettier than the MC IDE. The bottom of my parrot cage is
prettier than the MC IDE. ;)
--
Jacqueline Landman Gay | jac...@hyperactivesw.com
HyperActive Software | http://www.hyperactivesw.com
Len Morgan wrote:
Can someone give me a quick summary of why I might want to use the
MetaCard IDE instead
of RunRev's? It seems that a lot of users of this group use MC. Is it
just what you were used
to or is there some feature that Rev's doesn't?
Just curious.
I think a lot of users may
29 matches
Mail list logo
