try
sheet stack [in parentStack]
-
Stephen Barncard
San Francisco
http://barncard.com
2009/5/7 Derek Bump - Dreamscape Software <
userevolut...@dreamscapesoftware.com>
> All of a sudden the "answer as sheet" is drawing the sheet on the wrong
> stack. Anyone have any id
sorry, I'm thinking of how I sheet my custom answer dialogs. Perhaps you
could set the defaultstack first before calling answer...
-
Stephen Barncard
San Francisco
http://barncard.com
2009/5/7 Derek Bump - Dreamscape Software <
userevolut...@dreamscapesoftware.com>
> All
I reread your first post. I didn't see that you'd already tried setting the
defaultstack. Are you using the latest version of Rev (rc-2) ?
-
Stephen Barncard
San Francisco
http://barncard.com
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-re
I tried the following tests (one at a time of course) and they all
produced the same result...
-- Test 1
answer "testing" with "OK" as sheet
-- Test 2
set the defaultStack to "jcSetup"
answer "testing" with "OK" as sheet
-- Test 3
set the defaultStack to "jcSetup"
answer "testing" with "OK" as
Stephen,
The error occured, and then I remembered the update posted last night so
I tried updating. Same thing on both versions.
This is driving me crazy because I could have sworn that it worked this
morning with no problems at all. I'm racking my brains trying to think
of what code I changed
yes and this has and still works with my just finished project, with stock
answer and ask dialogs. Curious, I made two test stacks with ask and answer
used in handlers in buttons. I also tried it with a substack.
Everything worked as expected. Sheets aren't totally modal, one can navigate
to anothe
At the risk of over-simplifying things, getting them wrong, and missing
the point:
I just ran up a stack "QUESTION.rev" (and its now on revOnline under
'Richmond');
it has 2 substacks; one is a 'normal' substack, and one is set up as an
answer dialogue.
The answer dialogue substack pops up
I'm trying to get your stack to appear on RevOnline, but I can't seem to
find it, or you. Since they changed it, I can't seem to find anything.
What do I need to do to get to the stack?
Derek Bump
Dreamscape Software
http://www.dreamscapesoftware.com
___
v.com [mailto:use-revolution-
> boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of Derek Bump - Dreamscape Software
> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 9:06 AM
> To: How to use Revolution
> Subject: Re: answer as sheet showing on wrong stack
>
> Stephen,
>
> The error occured, and then I remembered the upda
RevOnline is really pretty now, but still hard to find stuff. No 'by author'
search. I searched for QUESTION.rev and got 'Times Table Tester" a a result.
-
Stephen Barncard
San Francisco
http://barncard.com
2009/5/7 Derek Bump - Dreamscape Software <
userevolut...@dreamsc
tion-boun...@lists.runrev.com [mailto:use-revolution-
>> boun...@lists.runrev.com] On Behalf Of Derek Bump - Dreamscape Software
>> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 9:06 AM
>> To: How to use Revolution
>> Subject: Re: answer as sheet showing on wrong stack
>>
>>
LOL... my search for the same thing returned nothing at all. RevOnline
does look a lot better now, but still needs a lot of improvement.
Derek Bump
Dreamscape Software
http://www.dreamscapesoftware.com
___
Compress your photos quic
Hi Derek,
> Yes, I tried that as well, but I'm calling the answer from a modal
> window, so that didn't work.
I may be wrong, but I think this is the real issue. Maybe somebody else can
chime in, but I think there are certain parent loc values that are ignored when
calling a modal (answer) or
Whoa, I didn't know you were calling from a modal window. Modals are
supposed to be... well.. modal and as such don't really attach to any stack.
I put together a custom answer or ask dialog and used the 'sheet stack'
command. That should work, but it didn't; the custom sheeted stack didn't
work
Thank you Stephen!
I took what you said and did a test. I created a stack with 1
sub-stack. In the substack I created a button that answers "Hello
World" as a sheet. In the mainstack I created a button that modals the
substack.
The result is that the sheet appears behind the modal stack's very
stephen barncard wrote:
RevOnline is really pretty now, but still hard to find stuff. No 'by author'
search. I searched for QUESTION.rev and got 'Times Table Tester" a a result.
You can put the author name into the search box. I just typed in
"Jacque" and got all my game stacks.
--
Jacquelin
So, the proable reason no one found my "QUESTION.rev" stack is that nobody
wanted to type a taboo name. :)
Funny, though, not having a 'by author' search: I suppose the RR folks
WILL put that back for 4.0.
J. Landman Gay wrote:
stephen barncard wrote:
RevOnline is really pretty now, but still
On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Richmond Mathewson <
richmondmathew...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, the proable reason no one found my "QUESTION.rev" stack is that nobody
> wanted to type a taboo name. :)
>
I believe the real reason is that you uploaded your stack to the OLD
RevOnline whilst those th
Sorry, but I am part of the revolution (if, admittedly, only the
boy who throws eggs at the Tsar) as I am signed, and paid-up for the
conference, and so, in line to receive "4"; meanwhile, tootling around
with 2.6.1 I am, of necessity, confined to the old revOnline.
Of course, anybody who stopped
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Richmond Mathewson <
richmondmathew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Of course, anybody who stopped a minute and thought, would
> have kept old versions of RR for "magical moments" such as these.
>
Which of course is a lot less time than what is wasted looking for a stack
Wouldn't it make even more sense to have a prominent link on the New
RevOnLine to the Old RevOnLine? And vice versa? But that's too obvious!
Joe Wilkins
On May 9, 2009, at 7:31 AM, Kay C Lan wrote:
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Richmond Mathewson <
richmondmathew...@gmail.com> wrote:
Of
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
> Wouldn't it make even more sense to have a prominent link on the New
> RevOnLine to the Old RevOnLine? And vice versa? But that's too obvious!
>
Ah I don't think it's that easy.
New RevOnline doesn't run in Rev 3.0 or earlier, so anyon
Like some politicians we have known.
2009/5/9 Kay C Lan
> Reminds me of recent thread about
> speaking accurately but still being ambiguous
>
-
Stephen Barncard
San Francisco
http://barncard.com
___
use-revolution mailing li
Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
Wouldn't it make even more sense to have a prominent link on the New
RevOnLine to the Old RevOnLine? And vice versa? But that's too obvious!
It can't be done. The two systems use different back-end databases,
different log-ins, and a completely rewritten RevOnline stac
So perhaps, on further reflection, we just need some sort of "caveat"
dialog on the two sites, that let users know this problem exists when
they can't find that for which they're searching. Would save the list
having to "re-explain" this condition ad nauseam. I'm always looking
for simplist
Kay C:
I figured that was probably an issue, but didn't take the time to
explore and think it through.
Sorry,
Joe Wilkins
On May 9, 2009, at 9:05 AM, Kay C Lan wrote:
On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins
wrote:
Wouldn't it make even more sense to have a prominent link o
26 matches
Mail list logo
