On Jun 7, 2007, at 9:34 AM, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
Congrats, Trevor. If you've come up with an acceptable handler that
performs well, then my suggestion is entirely moot at this time.
I'm surprised that you were able to come up with a good solution in
the time frame you mention. Great!
Congrats, Trevor. If you've come up with an acceptable handler that
performs well, then my suggestion is entirely moot at this time. I'm
surprised that you were able to come up with a good solution in the
time frame you mention. Great!
Joe Wilkins
On Jun 7, 2007, at 9:24 AM, Trevor DeVore
On Jun 6, 2007, at 4:47 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
So it's font dependent and we're back where we started. :( You may
be stuck with your images after all, since there is no good way to
read the actual positioning of the glyph inside its text box.
I think I will post a feature request for get
On Jun 6, 2007, at 5:09 PM, Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
I realize it would take a lot of initial work, but you guys seem up
for it: why not just use a lookup table with the exact values you
need for each font "condition" listed?
Hi Joe,
I think the time to research all of the possible scenari
On 6/6/07, J. Landman Gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
> I realize it would take a lot of initial work, but you guys seem up for
> it: why not just use a lookup table with the exact values you need for
> each font "condition" listed?
Geek rule #26: It isn't cool unless yo
Joe Lewis Wilkins wrote:
I realize it would take a lot of initial work, but you guys seem up for
it: why not just use a lookup table with the exact values you need for
each font "condition" listed?
Geek rule #26: It isn't cool unless you can build an algorithm to do it. ;)
--
Jacqueline Landm
I realize it would take a lot of initial work, but you guys seem up
for it: why not just use a lookup table with the exact values you
need for each font "condition" listed? Of course, you can limit the
amount of preparation by just limiting the acceptable fonts and
perhaps some of the other
Trevor DeVore wrote:
On Jun 6, 2007, at 4:01 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Version 2:
on mouseUp
set the width of fld 1 to the width of grc 1
get the textsize of fld 1
if it < 20 then add 5 to it
set the textheight of fld 1 to it
set the height of fld 1 to it
set the loc of fld 1 to th
On Jun 6, 2007, at 4:01 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Version 2:
on mouseUp
set the width of fld 1 to the width of grc 1
get the textsize of fld 1
if it < 20 then add 5 to it
set the textheight of fld 1 to it
set the height of fld 1 to it
set the loc of fld 1 to the loc of grc 1
end mou
Trevor DeVore wrote:
Unfortunately it won't work in all cases. Using a field with the text
set to "1" and the textfont set to "webdings" is a good test case. The
problem is that even though you may have the textsize set to 100, the
vertical space taken up by the character is only 70 pixels (on
On Jun 6, 2007, at 1:07 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
Does this work? :
on mouseUp
set the width of fld 1 to the width of grc 1 -- the circle
get the textsize of fld 1
set the textheight of fld 1 to it + (it div 3)
set the height of fld 1 to the formattedheight of fld 1
set the margins of
Trevor DeVore wrote:
On Jun 6, 2007, at 3:43 AM, Trevor DeVore wrote:
I'm trying to center text in a field within a graphic (circle). The
text can be any font and any size.
Update - I haven't been able to find a reliable means of calculating the
center of text using any field properties so I
On Jun 6, 2007, at 3:43 AM, Trevor DeVore wrote:
I'm trying to center text in a field within a graphic (circle). The
text can be any font and any size.
Update - I haven't been able to find a reliable means of calculating
the center of text using any field properties so I resorted to
expor
13 matches
Mail list logo
