Len,
I liked the idea of a water tank and made a revlet that consists of the
tank. You can drag the tank around,
set width and height by sliders or fill the tank with a number.
Be patient with the revlet: it somehow took 30 plus seconds before it
responded to user input.(???)
It is a self-containe
That's what I was afraid of, but then, I should only have to figure it
out once.
len
On 3/27/2010 12:42 PM, Scott Rossi wrote:
Recently, Len Morgan wrote:
This actually brings up another question though: There are some cases of
tanks in the current system that display the feet of water
Recently, Len Morgan wrote:
> This actually brings up another question though: There are some cases of
> tanks in the current system that display the feet of water in the tank
> next to the tank, and some where the number is shown IN the tank. If we
> temporarily ignore how I'd let the user move
Maybe *I'm* the one that's misinterpreted the question! :-) I think
what you're telling me is that I'm over engineering the problem and that
all I'm really after is a self-contained group that has all of the
functions I'd need to manipulate the tank which I would then copy (or
clone?) as many
I'm not sure what would make your "object" not be portable?
the main things to look out for are:
Changing the rectangle or location will of course change some movement
dependant scripts. you need to look out for that if you do graphical stuff
(like resizing a water level graphic for your tank).
