PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 2:12 PM
Subject: Re: Timing (was wordOffset, repeat loop, speed?
> Wow!
> 63 milliseconds; 206 hits; 390345 characters ...looks like I have a very
> fast parser. It even works well with empty space, it gives me exactly what
I
> needed.
On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 01:12 PM, Mark Brownell wrote:
Wow!
63 milliseconds; 206 hits; 390345 characters ...looks like I have a
very
fast parser.
You might be able to tweak out a few more milliseconds. Consider using
"for" instead of "with" or making the "with" work harder for you.
At 10:58 AM -0800 1/6/03, Mark Brownell wrote:
>3.) I have an off-topic question about a single user pro-license. If I get
>that version does it mean that I can use it on Mac & Windows to debug on
>those OS
Yes. (Also Unix.) The license fee covers development and deployment on all
supported platfo
Wow!
63 milliseconds; 206 hits; 390345 characters ...looks like I have a very
fast parser. It even works well with empty space, it gives me exactly what I
needed. The array contains all first character numerical valuse for each
hit.
So what about multiple OS uses for the licensed person of the si
On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 12:24 PM, Dar Scott wrote:
(Your method probably has mc^2 time, call it E ;-),
I think got this wrong. When I saw the mc^2 pun, my brain turned off.
In any case, my guess is that offset will be faster.
Dar Scott
__
I just did an exact duplicate test in Director using the textCruncher Xtra
where the same 400 kbyt text doc took 2 ticks to build my array. It also
handle any combination of characters as the text to find. I will look into
"offset()" to see if I can get both things working the way I want it. When I
On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 11:58 AM, Mark Brownell wrote:
2.) I noticed that it won't work with multiple words or empty space
between
characters. I would like to work with the numericle offset of
characters and
place that info gathered into an array if possible.
Would offset() do what you
Hi,
Three questions below.
Code that works for me; ten-line-limit for testing at this point:
-- button #1
global gData, tStart, tElementNum
on mouseUp
put the milliseconds into tStartTime
put the text of field "impfield" into gData
put (the milliseconds - tStartTime) && " milliseconds" int
On Monday, January 6, 2003, at 07:54 AM, Glasgow, David wrote:
It may be that things have moved along a bit, or I am getting
something wrong I'd be interested in any comments.
Computers and timers are a lot more accurate.
It is true that interrupts and system threads are running all the t
Thanks, Dar & Ken; "big time." ... time for the 49'rs, Mark
___
use-revolution mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
10 matches
Mail list logo
