Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-29 Thread Mark Talluto
Hi Randall, I wrote a simple chat program a long time ago that is commented well enough to follow. You can download it from Richard Gaskin's RevNet. This is found in your plug-ins when Rev is running. It is called CS Chatter box. It will demonstrate P2P communication without the need

Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-29 Thread Chipp Walters
On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Randall Reetz wrote: > Anyone interested in providing an easy bare essentials tutorial for client > server communication from an xtalk projects perspective? There are a lot of > "the rest of us" who need help storming the web's gates. Well, here's a link to set

RE: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-29 Thread Randall Reetz
volution@lists.runrev.com Sent: 12/28/2008 12:42 AM Subject: Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web... > Oh, and i am not interested in web pages. I need superfast > communication___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.co

Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-28 Thread Peter Alcibiades
evolution > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Andre%27s-post%3A-Rev-and-the-Web...-tp21170116p21191042.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-

Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-28 Thread Bill Marriott
Peter, > Bill, a question: will it, whatever it turns out to be, work on Linux? Many people already use Rev CGI on Linux today. The plugin will work on Linux, too. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this u

Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-28 Thread Bill Marriott
Randall, > I hope you are going to provide this functionality wrapped into xTalk's > easy message passing protocol... > > send myClientMessage to myServer > > and... > > on myClientMessage >do blablabla > end myClientMessage You can already do this with CGI scripts; you can already

Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-28 Thread Bill Marriott
> Oh, and i am not interested in web pages. I need superfast communication. Web pages ain't necessarily slow, Randall. In fact web servers are highly optimized for speed, and sending a URL is often the speediest way to handle things, with the least overhead and processing effort. __

Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-28 Thread Bill Marriott
Randall, > Id like the simple answer. It *can* be simple. Clients, be they web pages or Rev stacks can say: http://yourserver.com/yourcgi.cgi?param=Hello+World That sends information to the Rev server-based script yourcgi.cgi, which could have something like, on startup put $1 into x

Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-27 Thread Chipp Walters
That should have read (needs a domain): put URL "http://www.example.net/file.txt"; into tMyVar On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 1:25 AM, Chipp Walters wrote: > > put URL "http://www.mytesttext.txt"; into tMyVar > > > ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revoluti

Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-27 Thread Chipp Walters
This thread reminds me of the 'make art' button some folks want for 3D apps. :-) Sorry, Randall, you have to get your hands a little dirty. All the folks here have given you the tools, but you're going to have to learn to fish if you want to catch some. put URL "http://www.mytesttext.txt"; into tM

Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-26 Thread Alex Tweedly
Brian Yennie wrote: Randall, Read the docs on sockets. It's actually not that much harder that what you describe below, but you're going to have to at least try it =). Once you have a few handlers working, you can have your own higher level API. put "127.0.0.1:8080" into myServer open socke

Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-26 Thread Brian Yennie
Randall, Read the docs on sockets. It's actually not that much harder that what you describe below, but you're going to have to at least try it =). Once you have a few handlers working, you can have your own higher level API. put "127.0.0.1:8080" into myServer open socket to myServer writ

Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-26 Thread Randall Lee Reetz
Thanks Bill. I hope you are going to provide this functionality wrapped into xTalk's easy message passing protocol... send myClientMessage to myServer and... on myClientMessage do blablabla end myClientMessage Randall On Dec 25, 2008, at 10:40 PM, Bill Marriott wrote: Randall,

Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-26 Thread Randall Lee Reetz
Yes, it is always good to know. Or is it? I am a fan of automation. I am working on an evolving AI scheme. It sucks intelligence out of humans (they don't get hurt in the process). So I am up to my eyeballs in stuff to learn and invent (I've got a warehouse full of fishing rods alread

Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-26 Thread Eric Chatonet
Bonsoir Randall, I'm afraid you don't want to begin by the beginning, right ;-) But it's necessary... Others have not given you fish but fishing rods: is it not better? To be frank, when I began myself to run into TCP communication, I had to make efforts before understanding by MYSELF how it c

RE: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-26 Thread Randall Reetz
y, and vice versa. No delay beyond com speed. Thus the need for com as xtalk messages. Randall -Original Message- From: "Brian Yennie" To: "How to use Revolution" Sent: 12/26/2008 1:10 AM Subject: Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web... Randall, It sounds like

RE: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-26 Thread Jan Schenkel
--- Randall Reetz wrote: > Id like the simple answer. In script i have to > write ?? to send a message to a project on a > server. What script would need to be on the > recieving end? It is that simple. No? > Hi Randall, Brian already suggested looking into the socket commands for lower-le

Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-26 Thread Brian Yennie
Randall, It sounds like what you need to start with are socket commands. Check out the accept, open socket, write to socket, read from socket commands. This should give you a place to start playing around with simple client / server communication. There are many gaming servers written in

Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-26 Thread Peter Alcibiades
Bill, a question: will it, whatever it turns out to be, work on Linux? (Unlike RevBrowser, of course) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Andre%27s-post%3A-Rev-and-the-Web...-tp21170116p21172543.html Sent from the Revolution - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com

RE: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-25 Thread Randall Reetz
8 10:40 PM Subject: Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web... Randall, Thanks to the magic of gmane, I was able to dig up this thread (and link to the forum) which this seems based upon. Andre's post: http://forums.runrev.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=1612 It's a little bit of ancient hist

Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-25 Thread Bill Marriott
Randall, Thanks to the magic of gmane, I was able to dig up this thread (and link to the forum) which this seems based upon. Andre's post: http://forums.runrev.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=1612 It's a little bit of ancient history now, as Rev is moving forward on two fronts. First we are definit

Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-25 Thread Randall Lee Reetz
09 PM, Alex Tweedly wrote: Randall Lee Reetz wrote: Andre, I have a need for ongoing conversion of xTalk projects/stacks to multiple-simultaneous-user collaborative environment (projects running over the web?). I found your post "Rev and the Web, feedback wanted." and want to

Re: Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-25 Thread Alex Tweedly
Randall Lee Reetz wrote: Andre, I have a need for ongoing conversion of xTalk projects/stacks to multiple-simultaneous-user collaborative environment (projects running over the web?). I found your post "Rev and the Web, feedback wanted." and want to revisit these concepts to se

Andre's post: Rev and the Web...

2008-12-25 Thread Randall Lee Reetz
Andre, I have a need for ongoing conversion of xTalk projects/stacks to multiple-simultaneous-user collaborative environment (projects running over the web?). I found your post "Rev and the Web, feedback wanted." and want to revisit these concepts to see what has been done and

Re: Rev and the Web

2008-05-22 Thread Neal Campbell K3NC
I can certainly understand that a company wants control of their message both in terms of content and timing. Look at MS as a great company that doesn't control it as much as they wish (witness some of the Longhorn videos on Utoob or the Gates announcement of the next Windows generation com

RE: Rev and the Web

2008-05-22 Thread Lynn Fredricks
> Reporting about non-existent features is also prediction. I'm > not saying that one shouldn't read your or anyone's blog. I > just want to point out that people should rely on the RunRev > website only, if they want to know which features RunRev has > or will have. I have to disagree with yo

Re: Rev and the Web

2008-05-21 Thread Mark Schonewille
Dear Lynn, Reporting about non-existent features is also prediction. I'm not saying that one shouldn't read your or anyone's blog. I just want to point out that people should rely on the RunRev website only, if they want to know which features RunRev has or will have. Best regards, Mark

RE: Rev and the Web

2008-05-21 Thread Lynn Fredricks
> That's right, Lynn, but do you also know which of the > features announced in Las Vegas will not make it into the > final version? If you do, please tell. Now that's prediction rather than reporting ;-) Best regards, Lynn Fredricks Mirye Software Publishing http://www.mirye.com Mirye Commun

Re: Rev and the Web

2008-05-21 Thread Thomas McGrath III
If this was know before RevLive I would have gone despite my finances etc. I for one can not wait Tom McGrath Let the mashups begin. On May 21, 2008, at 4:08 PM, Jan Schenkel wrote: And that sums up how I feel about Revolution and its future. Spread the word! Jan Schenkel.

Re: Rev and the Web

2008-05-21 Thread Jan Schenkel
--- Luis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A plugin, for some, would be seen as less of an > 'installation', and > with the Vista security tightened, I suppose the > browser plugin is > the 'least harmful'. > I still prefer web-borne stacks tho. > > Cheers, > > Luis. > >From what was demoed at t

Re: Rev and the Web

2008-05-21 Thread Mark Schonewille
That's right, Lynn, but do you also know which of the features announced in Las Vegas will not make it into the final version? If you do, please tell. Best regards, Mark Schonewille -- Economy-x-Talk Consulting and Software Engineering http://economy-x-talk.com http://www.salery.biz Color

RE: Rev and the Web

2008-05-21 Thread Lynn Fredricks
> Keep in mind that Lynn's announcement is not an official > RunRev announcement, i.e. the final product may look very > different. At the bottom of this page of the newsletter > > you can read what RunRev has to say about it. I am not a

RE: Rev and the Web

2008-05-21 Thread Lynn Fredricks
> I'm surprised there hasn't been any talk of the blog post > mentioning better integration of Rev and the Web/Browsers. How many people have a blog here? Im assuming you are talking about the mention I made in my blog at http://www.lynnfredricks.com. Best regards, Lynn

Re: Rev and the Web

2008-05-21 Thread Luis
EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm surprised there hasn't been any talk of the blog post mentioning better integration of Rev and the Web/Browsers. Cheers, Luis. Well, I blogged about it from my 'business fotware' point of view. But we can only tell how much of a killer app

Re: Rev and the Web

2008-05-21 Thread Jan Schenkel
--- Luis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm surprised there hasn't been any talk of the blog > post mentioning > better integration of Rev and the Web/Browsers. > > Cheers, > > Luis. > Well, I blogged about it from my 'business fotware' point

Re: Rev and the Web

2008-05-21 Thread Mark Schonewille
Hi, Keep in mind that Lynn's announcement is not an official RunRev announcement, i.e. the final product may look very different. At the bottom of this page of the newsletter you can read what RunRev has to say about it. I am not awa

Re: Rev and the Web

2008-05-21 Thread Luis
here hasn't been any talk of the blog post mentioning better integration of Rev and the Web/Browsers. Cheers, Luis. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your

Re: Rev and the Web

2008-05-21 Thread Mark Schonewille
ad it at http://economy-x-talk.com/cc.html On 21 mei 2008, at 10:16, Luis wrote: I'm surprised there hasn't been any talk of the blog post mentioning better integration of Rev and the Web/Browsers. Cheers, Luis. ___ use-revolution m

Rev and the Web

2008-05-21 Thread Luis
I'm surprised there hasn't been any talk of the blog post mentioning better integration of Rev and the Web/Browsers. Cheers, Luis. ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsub

Re: Asking about Rev and the Web-PHP?

2006-01-03 Thread Dan Shafer
Michael. Yep, it sure can. You can code PHP Web pages and then use the usual Rev techniques for retrieving those pages through the PHP templates and gather results into Rev variables. The resident guru on this topic (as with so many others) is Chipp Walters, who will undoubtedly chime in here

Asking about Rev and the Web-PHP?

2006-01-03 Thread Michael Mandaville
Can Rev work with PhP programming to serve up web pages? ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription preferences: http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/