Re: Rev_rant part 2

2006-11-15 Thread Dave
On 14 Nov 2006, at 16:42, J. Landman Gay wrote: Dave wrote: The problem is when a new user sits down in front of the IDE and after a little "playing" their (say) Application Browser Window will not appear, they blame the whole RunRev envorment not just the IDE. It just gives an impressio

Re: Rev_rant part 2

2006-11-14 Thread J. Landman Gay
Dave wrote: The problem is when a new user sits down in front of the IDE and after a little "playing" their (say) Application Browser Window will not appear, they blame the whole RunRev envorment not just the IDE. It just gives an impression of instability in the whole environment, they think

Re: Rev_rant part 2

2006-11-14 Thread Dave
On 10 Nov 2006, at 17:43, Bernard Devlin wrote: Dave said: >> I think it's really sad that this is the case, and, the new way of selling support or updates compounds that problem and makes it harder to sell (in my experience). << It might make it harder for you to sell. That doesn't mean that

Re: Rev_rant part 2

2006-11-10 Thread Bernard Devlin
Dave said: >> I think it's really sad that this is the case, and, the new way of selling support or updates compounds that problem and makes it harder to sell (in my experience). << It might make it harder for you to sell. That doesn't mean that (overall) it is a less profitable way for Runrev