Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

Mark, As you may be able to surmise, most of us developers are reticent to discuss our own registration libraries in a public forum. You might want to search the archives as there has been a few threads on this topic in the past. best, Chipp ___ use-re

Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

orporate a viable registration scheme into a project I hope to release soon. Are there other alternatives that people who use Rev like? Thanks Mark Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool kee nethery Mon, 22 Aug 2005 21:57:08 -0700 Just waiting for Andre to finish it and relea

Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

What is the status of Andre's project... has it been released? I'm wondering how to incorporate a viable registration scheme into a project I hope to release soon. Are there other alternatives that people who use Rev like? Thanks Mark Re: Revolution Compatible Registratio

RE: The KRM (Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool)

Hi Kee, > We just changed our KRM rates: > > They are much more attractive. :-) Scott ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubs

Re: The KRM (Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool)

On Aug 23, 2005, at 8:46 AM, Dan Shafer wrote: My concern about Kagi -- and I've been a member for a long time -- is that their rates are quite high when compared, e.g., to PayPal. We just changed our KRM rates: Kee _

Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

Levi Kendall wrote: I was just wondering what everyone out there was using for releasing commercial demo applications with Revolution. What I'm thinking in terms of here is having a limited demo version that will show the user *some* of the functionality but which is "crippled" in some areas.

RE: The KRM (Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool)

> This all depends on the application and its popularity... To some extent. You and I have ADSL - but a huge proportion of the world are still relying on good old dial up and will be for some years to come. > i dont care to download 20MBs updates or 300 demos if they > are "good" or criticall

Re: The KRM (Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool)

My concern about Kagi -- and I've been a member for a long time -- is that their rates are quite high when compared, e.g., to PayPal. I'm using PayPal and a PayPal support service called SoftSeller to handle the soft-goods fulfillment. They charge 25 cents per download regardless of how man

RE: The KRM (Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool)

Scott, This all depends on the application and its popularity... i dont care to download 20MBs updates or 300 demos if they are "good" or critically needed or if they give me a 10% boost... i also got unlimided downloads and adsl going so... downloads dont have a price... they just compete for

RE: The KRM (Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool)

> My concern about Kagi -- and I've been a member for a long > time -- is > that their rates are quite high when compared, e.g., to PayPal. I'm with Regsoft right now and have been for some years. But DigitalRiver have been making some noises that RegSoft is a "ageing platform", which does not

RE: The KRM (Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool)

Hi Andre, > The Revolution KRM (Kagi Registration Module) is a Revolution Stack > that plays the role of middle man talking to secure Kagi Server and > your app. It is very easy to use and very secure. Nothing is ever > stored on customprops or stuff like that. The connection is secure > a

The KRM (Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool)

On Aug 23, 2005, at 11:39 AM, Scott Kane wrote: The module is almost done. I am testing it on Tiger. Thanks Andre! Looking forward to it. :-) Scott Scott, The Revolution KRM (Kagi Registration Module) is a Revolution Stack that plays the role of middle man talking to secure Kagi Ser

RE: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

> The module is almost done. I am testing it on Tiger. Thanks Andre! Looking forward to it. :-) Scott ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsubscribe and manage your subscription prefe

RE: Re[2]: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

> Armadillo sux. Even the application was fully > cracked. > Also, there are some protectors/packers that > offers more protection that Armadillo does. > No offence, this is my ideea. Nothing is ever un-crackable. Armadillo comes pretty close. ASProtect is cracked in minutes. I did it myself (I

Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

On Aug 23, 2005, at 2:11 AM, Scott Kane wrote: Just waiting for Andre to finish it and release it. Seeing that Kagi is Mac Mecca () I'd be very pleased to hear when it is finished! :-) Scott The module is almost done. I am testing it on Tiger. cheers andre

Re[2]: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

Tuesday, August 23, 2005 4:25:16 PM (GMT +02:00) Hi Scott and to all ppl here, Armadillo sux. Even the application was fully cracked. Also, there are some protectors/packers that offers more protection that Armadillo does. No offence, this is my ideea. Can I have an trial application packed with

Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

Scott Kane wrote: Actually - there's an internet trade association you might be interested in. I was one of the first members. It's the "Association of Independent Software Industry Professionals". or AISIP for short. It's a modest fee (under US$25 a year if I remember right) and features sever

RE: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

> Any opinions about the pros and cons of AISIP vs. ASP? I was Vice President and also a member of the BOD at the ASP as well as being a member for many years. The ASP is good - but I find the politics annoying and found myself unsubscribing from the newsgroups to avoid that and the squabbling.

RE: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

> Just waiting for Andre to finish it and release it. Seeing that Kagi is Mac Mecca () I'd be very pleased to hear when it is finished! :-) Scott ___ use-revolution mailing list use-revolution@lists.runrev.com Please visit this url to subscribe, unsu

RE: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

ow to use Revolution' > Subject: RE: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool > > > Last year, i was working on a specialized registration > manager module. > > It is based on different types of registration schemes (1-x > users), different key exchange schemes

RE: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

> You're one of the moderators there? So cool! Yep. I was the first one. Kathy is now my co-mod. Works well as we are in two time zones. > Folks, he's being modest: for small software development shops like > most of us have, those newsgroups are the most valuable > things in Usenet. Act

Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

Just waiting for Andre to finish it and release it. Kee On Aug 22, 2005, at 4:18 PM, Dan Shafer wrote: Kagi was indeed working on such a module when we held RevCon West a couple of months ago. As far as I can tell, they have not yet announced that product. Disabling some features of the p

RE: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

Last year, i was working on a specialized registration manager module. It is based on different types of registration schemes (1-x users), different key exchange schemes, proprietary algorithms, quantized-encryption, hardware-locking, etc... It can work in any stack with or without net registrat

Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

Scott Kane wrote: Great practical advice, Scott. Thanks for sharing. You are most welcome. Members, please feel free to ask anytime about this stuff. Without trying to blow my horn I've been in amongst this stuff for a couple of decades and moderate three Big 8 newsgroups on Usenet: comp.so

RE: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

Having said that about Mac and *nix take a look at http://www.esellerate.net/ They are a registration service (collect money on behalf of software authors) and have a wrapper/order generator for software. They have an SDK for Mac, but I'm not aware of a *nix one... Scott _

RE: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

> Armadillo looks great but appears to be only Windows based. > Is there another > tool that will also work for Mac & Linux builds along with > Windows? Thanks, None that I know of for Mac and *nix. I'd look at other strategies. Nag screens with timer coundowns (no more than 5 seconds though

RE: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

> Great practical advice, Scott. Thanks for sharing. You are most welcome. Members, please feel free to ask anytime about this stuff. Without trying to blow my horn I've been in amongst this stuff for a couple of decades and moderate three Big 8 newsgroups on Usenet: comp.software.shareware.au

Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

Armadillo looks great but appears to be only Windows based. Is there another tool that will also work for Mac & Linux builds along with Windows? Thanks, Oak On 8/22/05, Scott Kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I don't suspect this kind of thing would be hard to roll your own. > > The "

Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

Great practical advice, Scott. Thanks for sharing. On Aug 22, 2005, at 6:44 PM, Scott Kane wrote: I don't suspect this kind of thing would be hard to roll your own. The "hard" part is coming up with an unlock code/mechanism that can't be trivially cracked. On Windows I use Armadillo - ht

RE: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

> I don't suspect this kind of thing would be hard to roll your own. > The "hard" part is coming up with an unlock code/mechanism > that can't > be trivially cracked. On Windows I use Armadillo - http://www.siliconrealms.com I've never been cracked. It blocks Soft Ice and similar debuggers

Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

Kagi was indeed working on such a module when we held RevCon West a couple of months ago. As far as I can tell, they have not yet announced that product. Disabling some features of the product until some condition is met is straightforward provided, of course, you've modularized your code

Re: Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

Hi Levi, >At this point I'm looking for any system to do this, perhaps it could be web integrated I vaguely recall that there should have been a Kagi Module for Revolution. I could also be wrong. :-) Kee might be able to tell you more about it. Maybe this thread is interesting: http://l

Revolution Compatible Registration Tool

Hi All, I was just wondering what everyone out there was using for releasing commercial demo applications with Revolution. What I'm thinking in terms of here is having a limited demo version that will show the user *some* of the functionality but which is "crippled" in some areas. The user wil