Re: Script Limits and solid IDE evolution!

2003-08-14 Thread revolution
Without the Starter Kit's features I would never have adopted and advocated Revolution. I had tried Metacard a few years ago, and just didn't 'get it'. It seemed like a toy (I know I was way off the mark). The Rev IDE is what made me look at it again. But to anyone who didn't use a Mac 10

Re: Script Limits and solid IDE evolution!

2003-08-14 Thread Wolfgang M. Bereuter
Hi Benrhard, On Thursday, Aug 7, 2003, at 16:09 Europe/Vienna, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Runrev should instead be publicising Revolution. And this means attending other than Mac-only events - unfortunate as it may be to Mac and Linux users, Win32 still massively dominates the desktop. The

Re: Script Limits and solid IDE evolution!

2003-08-10 Thread Pierre Sahores
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Runrev should instead be publicising Revolution. And this means attending other than Mac-only events - unfortunate as it may be to Mac and Linux users, Win32 still massively dominates the desktop. The whole xCard/xTalk paradigm is virtually unknown to Win32

Marketing Rev in Other Worlds (was Re: Script Limits and solid IDE evolution!)

2003-08-09 Thread Dan Shafer
This discussion of the need for the RunRev folks to market not just the product but the underlying xtalk/xcard paradigm to the world of Windows in particular raises for me another issue that I think prevents the product from achieving the kind of brilliant Aha! success it richly deserves. I

Re: Script Limits and solid IDE evolution!

2003-08-08 Thread Barry Levine
I've been using Rev since March 30, 2002. I know this because I subscribed to this list on that date and have saved every eMail since then (1434 messages including some from the Rev folks off-list). I purchased my license May 15, 2002. That's 46 days until I understood enough about Rev to draw