Rev's Cards and stack metaphor can be traced though a long history of
stack-based programming. For those of us not entirely familiar with its
idiosyncrasies, in can be a bit unfamiliar.
For instance, I have a stack of cards, some to be kept, some discarded.
In the processing of my program, I
On Jun 18, 2004, at 1:07 PM, Troy Rollins wrote:
But, I endeavor to persevere. Is there a better technique than what
I've described? Failing that, how does one delete all the marked cards
in a stack?
Is this the expected technique?
repeat with i = 1 to the number of marked cards
go
On Jun 18, 2004, at 1:39 PM, Troy Rollins wrote:
But, I endeavor to persevere. Is there a better technique than what
I've described? Failing that, how does one delete all the marked
cards in a stack?
Is this the expected technique?
repeat with i = 1 to the number of marked cards
go
On 6/18/04 12:07 PM, Troy Rollins wrote:
I started by marking all the cards (??).
I then worked with my data a bit, all the while unmarking cards to be
kept. My thinking was that the system would allow me to delete marked
cards at the end of the cycle. I stupidly thought that delete marked
On Jun 18, 2004, at 1:50 PM, J. Landman Gay wrote:
There is some frustration involved with learning any programming
environment, and Rev is full-featured and comprehensive enough to have
a learning curve.
True enough. But I think some will admit that the curve is actually
steeper for those
On 6/18/04 1:27 PM, Troy Rollins wrote:
I can't tell you how
many times I've types myVar = to start setting the value of a
variable. This is not the kind of thing even someone _completely_ new to
programming would do, simply because they would only know the syntax as
defined by Rev. Similarly
Hi All,
Le 18 juin 04, à 22:15, J. Landman Gay a écrit :
On 6/18/04 1:27 PM, Troy Rollins wrote:
I can't tell you how many times I've types myVar = to start setting
the value of a variable. This is not the kind of thing even someone
_completely_ new to programming would do, simply because they
