Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched

On Apr 29, 2002, at 5:30 AM, tuviah snyder wrote: I think all of these have been looked at or commented on. #143 has not. Alex Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Mindlube Software | what a waste of thumbs that are opposable to make machines that are disposable -Ani DiFranco __

Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched?

On Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at 07:42 AM, Dar Scott wrote: I know what you mean. I entered the matchText() crash bug back in August. Oh, that was July 19. That was how I tricked Alex into thinking he had the winning (losing) entry. Dar Scott ___

Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched?

On Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at 10:39 AM, Dave Cragg wrote: Just out of interest, is "(?>x)*" a valid regular expression? If so, what does it do? Yes. It is a non-backtracking, non-capturing group. Non-backtracking has many uses, but I use it especially to keep match failures from taking a

Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched

On Monday, April 29, 2002, at 05:30 AM, tuviah snyder wrote: I just resolved many of these. But you know a lot of these are enhancement requests that have been implemented or are being implemented..so we the best we can do is mark later, or in some cases fixed. I think all of these have been lo

Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched

>ID Changed Sev Plt Owner StateOS Votes > Summary >143 2003-09-19 maj Mac [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW All 20 >naming collisions... >659 2003-10-01 enh Mac [EMAIL PROTECTED]NEW All 21 >Wanting to password-protect... >670 2003-09-18 enh

Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched

On Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at 11:39 AM, Alex Rice wrote: HA! I can top that. I have a July 13 2003 bug, with 20 votes, that has been assigned, but it still NEW and has no comments from the engineer. Don't see any bug with 20 votes... See bug #143 it has 20 votes. Close behind is #148 it has

Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched

On Jan 14, 2004, at 11:42 AM, Dar Scott wrote: From bugzilla: ID Changed Sev Plt Owner StateOS Votes Summary 143 2003-09-19 maj Mac [EMAIL PROTECTED] NEW All 20 naming collisions... Although these 3 are enhancement requests, I think: 659

Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched

On Monday, April 29, 2002, at 02:22 AM, tuviah snyder wrote: HA! I can top that. I have a July 13 2003 bug, with 20 votes, that has been assigned, but it still NEW and has no comments from the engineer. Don't see any bug with 20 votes... From bugzilla: ID Changed Sev Plt Owner

Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched

On Apr 29, 2002, at 2:22 AM, tuviah snyder wrote: HA! I can top that. I have a July 13 2003 bug, with 20 votes, that has been assigned, but it still NEW and has no comments from the engineer. Don't see any bug with 20 votes... See bug #143 it has 20 votes. Close behind is #148 it has 18 votes. Let

Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched

> HA! I can top that. I have a July 13 2003 bug, with 20 votes, that has > been assigned, but it still NEW and has no comments from the engineer. Don't see any bug with 20 votes... Tuviah ___ use-revolution mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.r

Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched?

On Jan 14, 2004, at 3:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've also entered some bugs that never got saved... X, this one sounds like a bugzilla bug, that I've complained about before, and I think I bugzilla'd it too :-) In this post

Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched?

On Jan 14, 2004, at 10:04 AM, Dar Scott wrote: Oh, yeah! Mine is bug #16 and it has a severity of--hey!--normal. Ach you win :-) Alas to win is to lose in this game. What is a crash doing at normal? Maybe I didn't set this high enough. I thought I did. (I don't see what bug you mean, Alex.

Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched?

At 9:26 am -0700 14/1/04, Dar Scott wrote: I would guess on all, but I don't know. I would assume even more so that it will show up in standalones where it shows up in development. I last checked this in October and it failed on the Rev version and OS X version at that time. Here is a quick

Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched?

On Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at 09:46 AM, Alex Rice wrote: On Jan 14, 2004, at 7:42 AM, Dar Scott wrote: I know what you mean. I entered the matchText() crash bug back in August. It is still at NEW. HA! I can top that. I have a July 13 2003 bug, with 20 votes, that has been assigned, but it

Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched?

On Jan 14, 2004, at 7:42 AM, Dar Scott wrote: I know what you mean. I entered the matchText() crash bug back in August. It is still at NEW. HA! I can top that. I have a July 13 2003 bug, with 20 votes, that has been assigned, but it still NEW and has no comments from the engineer. Alex Rice <[

Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched?

On Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at 08:29 AM, Andy Burns wrote: What I guess I meant is if we all had all the computer OS's that Rev runs on, would the problem occur on all or some. I would guess on all, but I don't know. I would assume even more so that it will show up in standalones where it s

Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched?

To: "How to use Revolution" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 10:11 AM Subject: Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched? > > On Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at 08:02 AM, Andy Burns wrote: > > > Are the bugs reported verified on all the bu

Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched?

On Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at 08:02 AM, Andy Burns wrote: Are the bugs reported verified on all the build platforms? Are the bugs only occurring during development or after building standalones? Could the bugs be isolated to a specific OS which Revolution runs on? Are you asking about the m

Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched?

Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "How to use Revolution" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 9:42 AM Subject: Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched? > > On Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at 03:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > &g

Re: Why are bugs from September still untouched?

On Wednesday, January 14, 2004, at 03:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I entered a bug in September of last year and it is still marked as NEW? I know what you mean. I entered the matchText() crash bug back in August. It is still at NEW. The only progress seems to be the component was change

Why are bugs from September still untouched?

I entered a bug in September of last year and it is still marked as NEW? There is no status, no nothing. I've also entered some bugs that never got saved... THIS IS DEFINITELY NOT ENCOURAGING. Who do we complain to in RR? -=- Xavier Bury Clearstream Ser