Recently, Peter Brigham wrote:
> I'm experimenting with blendlevels, with some success, but it's trial
> and error, like everything. The docs say that a blendlevel of 0 is
> transparent, 100 is opaque, and this is true for images and other
> objects (nifty effects!), but for stacks it's the opposi
Hi Peter,
In my doc (dictionnary), I read :
Le 7 déc. 07 à 23:46, Peter Brigham a écrit :
I'm experimenting with blendlevels, with some success, but it's
trial and error, like everything. The docs say that a blendlevel of
0 is transparent, 100 is opaque,
Here, in the docs of Rev 2.8.1 (E
I'm experimenting with blendlevels, with some success, but it's trial
and error, like everything. The docs say that a blendlevel of 0 is
transparent, 100 is opaque, and this is true for images and other
objects (nifty effects!), but for stacks it's the opposite -- when I
set the blendlevel