Does anyone know if the download on the runrev page which says 2.6 is
actually a newer version?
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Bill Humphrey wrote:
Does anyone know if the download on the runrev page which says 2.6 is
actually a newer version?
___
answering my own question.
It is 2.6.5 108
while the released version was 2.6.5 91 so I guess that means there
were 17
How can you tell the build number?
Thanks
Dave
Bill Humphrey wrote:
Does anyone know if the download on the runrev page which says 2.6
is actually a newer version?
___
answering my own question.
It is 2.6.5 108
while the released version was
What is this stealth build stuff?
I have been patiently waiting for the announcement on this list that
the promised (in a day or so) new bug fix build of 2.6 was ready for
download so I could try running it again.
Did it already happen???
Dennis
On Jun 14, 2005, at 12:42 PM, Bill
Hi Dave,
put the buildNumber or put buildNumber() -- in the message box.
Le 14 juin 05 à 18:57, David Burgun a écrit :
How can you tell the build number?
Best regards from Paris,
Eric Chatonet.
So Smart Software
For
How can you tell the build number?
Thanks
Dave
surprise!
answer the buildNumber :)
Robert
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
http://lists.runrev.com/mailman/listinfo/use-revolution
Thanks, I'm on 91 too, what bugs does it fix and does it make anything worse??
Thanks
Dave
How can you tell the build number?
Thanks
Dave
surprise!
answer the buildNumber :)
Robert
___
use-revolution mailing list
use-revolution@lists.runrev.com
Hi Dennis,
It isn't so much stealth builds, more the fact that it takes a couple of
days for updates to be reflected in the builds and then for an
announcement to be made.
I realise the previous email on this subject did say 'in a day or so',
but it took a little longer for the fixes to be made
No problem Mark,
I was just surprised when I saw someone talking about accidentally
coming across a new build in the download page without any
announcements of the change. That made me wonder how long the build
had been sitting there. I can understand it if they just happened to
catch
Mark, can you tell us if anything other than the engine was changed
in this build? If not, I'd download and install it. If there are
other changes, I'll wait until after RevCon.
Thanks.
Looking forward to meeting you soon!
dan
On Jun 14, 2005, at 1:25 PM, Mark Waddingham wrote:
Hi
Le mardi 07 juin 2005 à 14:44 -0300, Andre Garzia a écrit :
On Jun 7, 2005, at 2:40 PM, Damien Girard wrote:
That right, but runrev standalone work in GTK look and feel, the
problem can come from the Runrev IDE.
what problem? sorry, wasn't following the thread. Problem with your
Damien Girard wrote:
Le mardi 07 juin 2005 à 14:44 -0300, Andre Garzia a écrit :
On Jun 7, 2005, at 2:40 PM, Damien Girard wrote:
That right, but runrev standalone work in GTK look and feel, the
problem can come from the Runrev IDE.
what problem? sorry, wasn't following the thread.
Runrev WORKin Motif under Linux, you haven't got the GTK+ Look and
feel (not the KDE look and feel but the Gnome).
This is because library haven't got the good name.
Runrev search these library :
/usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so
/usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so
/usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so
And in your
Hi all,
I think I will become crazy, but I wait, I am waiting a Runtime
Revolution that WORK under linux.
Revolution 2.2 work but are bugged with new desktop manager (Gnome,
KDE), Revolution 2.5 and 2.5.1 doesn't work at all with the GTK+ Look
and feel and Revolution 2.6 doesn't work also.
I
Damien Girard wrote:
Hi all,
I think I will become crazy, but I wait, I am waiting a Runtime
Revolution that WORK under linux.
Revolution 2.2 work but are bugged with new desktop manager (Gnome,
KDE), Revolution 2.5 and 2.5.1 doesn't work at all with the GTK+ Look
and feel and Revolution 2.6
Richard Gaskin a écrit :
Damien Girard wrote:
Hi all,
I think I will become crazy, but I wait, I am waiting a Runtime
Revolution that WORK under linux.
Revolution 2.2 work but are bugged with new desktop manager (Gnome,
KDE), Revolution 2.5 and 2.5.1 doesn't work at all with the GTK+ Look
Of
Damien Girard
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 16:59
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: RUNREV 2.6 DOESN'T WORK
Richard Gaskin a écrit :
Damien Girard wrote:
Hi all,
I think I will become crazy, but I wait, I am waiting a Runtime
Revolution that WORK under linux.
Revolution
Of MisterX
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 17:47
To: 'How to use Revolution'
Subject: RE: RUNREV 2.6 DOESN'T WORK
Damien
I agree with you that Rev is very Mac only quality oriented
and the other platforms' appearance manager (out of macs) is
just useless.
There's GTK and there's gnome. I've
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Damien Girard
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 16:59
To: How to use Revolution
Subject: Re: RUNREV 2.6 DOESN'T WORK
Richard Gaskin a écrit :
Damien Girard wrote:
Hi all,
I think I will become crazy, but I wait, I am waiting a Runtime
Revolution that WORK under
Damien Girard wrote:
Linux can have a very great look and feel, but need some work.
Where I can download Metacard ? Because if Metacard work, I'll can write
software for Linux.
MetaCard is just the old name for Revolution before RunRev acquired it.
Same engine...
--
Richard Gaskin
Richard Gaskin a écrit :
Damien Girard wrote:
Linux can have a very great look and feel, but need some work.
Where I can download Metacard ? Because if Metacard work, I'll can
write software for Linux.
MetaCard is just the old name for Revolution before RunRev acquired
it. Same
On Jun 7, 2005, at 2:40 PM, Damien Girard wrote:
That right, but runrev standalone work in GTK look and feel, the
problem can come from the Runrev IDE.
what problem? sorry, wasn't following the thread. Problem with your
standalones or problem with some IDE behaviour?
Andre
--
Andre
From a functionality point of view, I've experienced no problems using
Rev on Linux, although I've never tried using any special
characters. I do though, fully agree with Damien about the look of
the applications in comparison to the Windows (and I assume, Mac)
counterparts. There are some really
23 matches
Mail list logo
