t;
From: robert.ech...@windriver.com
> To: user@ant.apache.org
> Subject: RE: ANT Wiki isn't wiki
> Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:02:31 +
>
> Hi Stefan,
> "Real" wiki's as you have defined would be safe from spam only on an intranet.
> You have suggested
hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2012 8:16 PM
To: user@ant.apache.org
Subject: RE: ANT Wiki isn't wiki
By my definition of wiki it should allow all users to edit any page or to
create a new page. Oh, that also happens to be Ward Cunningham's definition,
and he created the first
ld...@hotmail.com
> To: user@ant.apache.org
> Subject: RE: ANT Wiki isn't wiki
> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 19:16:16 -0500
>
>
> By my definition of wiki it should allow all users to edit any page or to
> create a new page. Oh, that also happens to be Ward Cunningham's
On 2012-04-16, Stephen L. De Rudder wrote:
> The ant wiki isn't a wiki. It seems like most if not all the pages can
> not be modified by anonymous contributers. Please don't call it a wiki
> if people are not allowed to contribute.
Yes, I fondly remember the time where you could run such a kind o
terpretation of the definition of wiki then maybe consider renaming it (or
not). Regardless it would be nice to have a publicly editable site for contr
ibutors like me to contribute to (besides this mailing list). SLDR(Stephen L. De
Rudder)> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 19:30:32 -0400
Subject: Re: A
wiki then maybe consider renaming it (or
not). Regardless it would be nice to have a publicly editable site for
contributors like me to contribute to (besides this mailing list).
SLDR(Stephen L. De Rudder)> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 19:30:32 -0400
> Subject: Re: ANT Wiki isn't wiki
>
A wiki doesn't have to be publicly editable to be a wiki. Wikipedia may
operate like that, but there are plenty of projects whose wikis are only
editable by registered users.
On Apr 15, 2012 6:32 PM, "Stephen L. De Rudder" wrote:
>
>
>
>
> The ant wiki isn't a wiki. It seems like most if not all
