Re: 0.4

2011-06-28 Thread Bengt Rodehav
Thanks for your reply Alasdair, Reading the documentation about the JPA support it seems like in 0.4, it is no longer necessary to list all classes in the persistence.xml. That's an improvement I'm really interested in which is why asked about the 0.4 release. I also use Karaf+Camel and I'm used

Re: 0.4

2011-06-28 Thread Younes Ouadi
Hello Alasdair, I endorse the point of view of both Bengt and Harald. It will be very interesting to release the enhancement allowing the runtime enhancer. This feature is more 'compatible' with the loose-coupling best-practice. Why should my 'entities bundles' know about their JPA Provider? I

RE: 0.4

2011-06-28 Thread Timothy Ward
Hi, I'm happy to look at getting a new release of the Aries JPA container. There are a couple of hoops to jump through with the build, but now that Equinox 3.7 and the OSGi 4.3 API are available it should be possible for us to get the build into a release-able state Regards, Tim Date: Tue,

Re: 0.4

2011-06-28 Thread Jeremy Hughes
+1 I can help out. I'm looking forward to trying out our new release process :-) Jeremy On 28 June 2011 11:17, Timothy Ward timothyjw...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I'm happy to look at getting a new release of the Aries JPA container. There are a couple of hoops to jump through with the build,

declaring a JNDI datasource

2011-06-28 Thread Daniel Plappert
Hi all, I am new to OSGI and currently trying to understand its mechanism. I want to create a service (bundle), which creates a JDNI datasource and provides this datasource to other services. What I've read so far is, OSGI itself (felix/equinox) can't use JNDI, but aries can. That's why I am

Re: 0.4

2011-06-28 Thread Jacek Laskowski
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com wrote: Now that you seem to release the sub projects independently (which I guess is good since it enables more frequent releases) it is important to document what versions of the different sub projects are compatible with each

Re: 0.4

2011-06-28 Thread Bengt Rodehav
Yeah, I guess you're right. I'm just a little sloppy when it comes to OSGi versioning myself... /Bengt 2011/6/28 Jacek Laskowski ja...@japila.pl On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Bengt Rodehav be...@rodehav.com wrote: Now that you seem to release the sub projects independently (which I

Re: 0.4

2011-06-28 Thread Oliver Lietz
Am Monday 27 June 2011 schrieb Alasdair Nottingham: Hi, hey, I don't think there are any plans. In the past releases have been more on demand. After the 0.3 release we decided to move to a pre-bundle release process so their wont be a big 0.4 release like there were previously. Some

Re: 0.4

2011-06-28 Thread Oliver Lietz
Am Tuesday 28 June 2011 schrieb Alasdair Nottingham: Alasdair Nottingham On 28 Jun 2011, at 22:06, Oliver Lietz apa...@oliverlietz.de wrote: Am Monday 27 June 2011 schrieb Alasdair Nottingham: Hi, hey, I don't think there are any plans. In the past releases have been more on

Re: 0.4

2011-06-28 Thread Alasdair Nottingham
Alasdair Nottingham On 28 Jun 2011, at 22:46, Oliver Lietz apa...@oliverlietz.de wrote: Am Tuesday 28 June 2011 schrieb Alasdair Nottingham: Alasdair Nottingham On 28 Jun 2011, at 22:06, Oliver Lietz apa...@oliverlietz.de wrote: Am Monday 27 June 2011 schrieb Alasdair Nottingham: Hi,