Re: What is the size of each Virtual Node token range?

2016-11-28 Thread Kant Kodali
Sorry by row I mean partition key. you do answer part of my question! thanks! On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 8:39 AM, Benjamin Roth wrote: > A token does not identify a row. A token is a hash value of the partition > key and the hash can have 2^64 different values. A collision is a normal > thing in a

Re: What is the size of each Virtual Node token range?

2016-11-28 Thread Benjamin Roth
A token does not identify a row. A token is a hash value of the partition key and the hash can have 2^64 different values. A collision is a normal thing in a hash table and it just means that different rows with the same token simply go to the same (v-)node, just like if they were different but in

What is the size of each Virtual Node token range?

2016-11-28 Thread Kant Kodali
1) What is the size of each Virtual Node token range? 2) Are all Vnode token ranges in one server are of the same size? 3) If these token ranges are predefined then isn't it implying that the maximum total number of rows in a server is also predefined? maximum total number of rows in a server = nu

Re: Java GC pauses, reality check

2016-11-28 Thread Kant Kodali
@Harikrishnan Pillai Thanks for that. What about the following? "We are using g1GC in most clusters with *26GB heap* and extra threads given to parallel and old gen collection. Those clusters 99% is also under 5 ms and doing good". *So with G1GC you are able get under 5ms not the C4 (Zing's Gar

Re: Java GC pauses, reality check

2016-11-28 Thread Harikrishnan Pillai
Hi @Kant Kodali, 11 /11 , 11 nodes in DC1 and 11 nodes in DC2. From: Kant Kodali Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 6:56 AM To: user@cassandra.apache.org Subject: Re: Java GC pauses, reality check Hi Hari, I am a little bit confused. What you mean 11/11 ? "We a

Re: Java GC pauses, reality check

2016-11-28 Thread Kant Kodali
Hi Hari, I am a little bit confused. What you mean 11/11 ? "We are using g1GC in most clusters with *26GB heap* and extra threads given to parallel and old gen collection. Those clusters 99% is also under 5 ms and doing good". So with G1GC you are able get under 5ms not the C4 (Zing's Garbage Co