That's for sure not much.
Your rdbms can probably hold the entire dataset in memory, and you can do
all kinds for queries that you want. Cassandra is for some very specific
use cases.
If you really need a cluster, have you thought about MySQL Cluster?
2012/1/25
> Standard analysis, display or a
I suppose that a CF Comparator type is used to sort the columns based on
its type, right?
So, let's suppose I have two columns: 1, 3. If I insert column 2 I will end
up with 1, 2, 3, ok?
I'm using the default BytesType as the Comparator type to store time series
columns (actually the value is a C#
ill depend on what exactly the client will do, but in my experience it
> won't work too well in general.
>
> c) Have you considered dual boot, so you can have a "good operating
> system" (as per Cassandra folks) in addition to Windows?
>
> Maxim
>
>
>
>
at's the bottleneck
>> you're wondering about. Fix that and the db, be it Cassandra or MySQL)
>> will move ahead of the other performance-wise. Turn your attention to the
>> other db and repeat.
>>
>> - Chris Gerken
>>
>> On Jan 22, 2012, at 7:10
Hello,
I've set up a testing evironment for Cassandra and MySQL, to compare both,
regarding *performance only*. And I must admit that I was expecting
Cassandra to beat MySQL. But I've not seen this happening up to now.
My application/use case is INSERT intensive, since I'm not updating
anything, j
Hello,
I
