I remember once that happening to me. The SStables were way beyond the
limit (32 default) but the compaction were still not starting. All I did
was nodetool enableautocompaction keyspace table and the compaction
immediately started and count of SSTables were down to normal level. It was
little
Thanks Rob.
Anyway, Ideally for a new node to join with ~50GB data of it's share, it
should be done in couple of minutes or hour tops, right?
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 6:07 PM, Robert Coli rc...@eventbrite.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:08 PM, Pranay Agarwal agarwalpran...@gmail.com
wrote
, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Pranay Agarwal agarwalpran...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi All.
I am using 15 nodes cassandra cluster(m3.2xlarge) with provisioned IOPS
disks (4000). I can see around 12k reads/sec ops on the cassandra cluster.
But I see around *~3500 read IOPS* on each of the cassandra nodes
Also, typically how long does it take for a node to join? I have in total 1
TB of data in 15 nodes cassandra cluster.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Pranay Agarwal agarwalpran...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thank Rahul, you are right. Unless the node complete joins the ring, there
is no data
PM, Pranay Agarwal agarwalpran...@gmail.com
wrote:
Also, the new nodes (3 of them, in *UJ state*) are showing some data size
(~10g). Is there any data loss chances with stopping the cassandra on them?
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Pranay Agarwal agarwalpran...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks
Hi All.
I am using 15 nodes cassandra cluster(m3.2xlarge) with provisioned IOPS
disks (4000). I can see around 12k reads/sec ops on the cassandra cluster.
But I see around *~3500 read IOPS* on each of the cassandra nodes. Is that
normal?
I am using LevelledCompaction and I can see in the
No. as shown in the histograms, 99% of reads are using 2 or less number of
tables. What's typical usually? Can anyone share from experience?
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Duncan Sands duncan.sa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 20/03/15 19:34, Pranay Agarwal wrote:
The cluster is processing something
, Pranay Agarwal agarwalpran...@gmail.com
wrote:
I have 14 nodes cassandra cluster, each node as around 50gb of data. I
added 3 new nodes to the cluster and I can see the status as *UJ *for
the new nodes. They have been in that for almost a day now and their data
size seems to be same as well
Also, the new nodes (3 of them, in *UJ state*) are showing some data size
(~10g). Is there any data loss chances with stopping the cassandra on them?
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Pranay Agarwal agarwalpran...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks Rob, You are right. I am using ReleaseVersion: 2.1.0
Hi All,
I used sstableloader to export data from first cassandra cluster (RF 3) to
another cluster with RF 1. Afther all the tables were copied and second
cluster was working fine I decided to run node repair on the second cluster
as regular operation. *This repair cause the data size on the
having to backup the token ring range but just the data backup?
-Pranay
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Robert Coli rc...@eventbrite.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Pranay Agarwal agarwalpran...@gmail.com
wrote:
I want to understand what is the best way to increase/change
.
Restoring from backup to a new cluster (including how to handle token
ranges) is discussed in detail here
http://www.datastax.com/documentation/cassandra/2.0/cassandra/operations/ops_snapshot_restore_new_cluster.html
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Pranay Agarwal agarwalpran...@gmail.com
Hi All,
I have 20 nodes cassandra cluster with 500gb of data and replication factor
of 1. I increased the replication factor to 3 and ran nodetool repair on
each node one by one as the docs says. But it takes hours for 1 node to
finish repair. Is that normal or am I doing something wrong?
Also,
13 matches
Mail list logo
