Hi,
I have a single partition key that been nagging me because I am receiving
org.apache.cassandra.db.filter.TombstoneOverwhelmingException. After filing
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8561 I managed to find the
partition key in question and which machine it was located on
%.
If it is of the same cause, does that mean I should switch to
SizeTieredCompactionStrategy?
--
View this message in context:
http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/CQL-query-throws-TombstoneOverwhelmingException-against-a-LeveledCompactionStrategy-table-tp7597077p7597091.html
-TombstoneOverwhelmingException-against-a-LeveledCompactionStrategy-table-tp7597077.html
Sent from the cassandra-u...@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
@cassandra.apache.org
From: Robert Coli rc...@eventbrite.com
Date: 08/23/2014 03:30AM
Subject: Re: .TombstoneOverwhelmingException
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Aravindan T aravinda...@tcs.com wrote:
1. Only insertion of records are done since the cassandra started. But, when
looked into the system.log
Dear All,
COuld you please help on how to resolve the below issue?
1. Only insertion of records are done since the cassandra started. But, when
looked into the system.log messages, i see this following error.
ERROR [HintedHandoff:15] 2014-08-22 22:35:17,629 SliceQueryFilter.java (line
200)
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Aravindan T aravinda...@tcs.com wrote:
1. Only insertion of records are done since the cassandra started. But,
when looked into the system.log messages, i see this following error.
...
Now, could you please tell how the tombstone got created when there are no
was deleted, but get
TombstoneOverwhelmingException in the remote datacenter where the data is
replicated. Does anybody know the reason the for the discrepancy?
FYI: This exception disappeared few minutes after trying select count(*) for
that row and count was 0. No major compaction was done
to be auto removed from the disk.
So for the next round of execution, the deleted records, should not be
queried out.
In this traffic, it will be generated lots of tombstones.
To avoid TombstoneOverwhelmingException, One way is to larger
tombstone_failure_threshold, but is there any impact
the disk.
So for the next round of execution, the deleted records, should not be
queried out.
In this traffic, it will be generated lots of tombstones.
To avoid TombstoneOverwhelmingException, One way is to larger
tombstone_failure_threshold, but is there any impact for the system's
performance
, the executed records will be deleted.
After gc_grace_seconds, it is expected to be auto removed from the disk.
So for the next round of execution, the deleted records, should not be
queried out.
In this traffic, it will be generated lots of tombstones.
To avoid TombstoneOverwhelmingException
with TombstoneOverwhelmingException
To: user@cassandra.apache.org user@cassandra.apache.org
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Edward Capriolo
edlinuxg...@gmail.comwrote:
I have to hijack this thread. There seem to be many problems with the
2.0.3 release.
+1. There is no 2.0.x release I
With cassandra an update is equivalent to an insert
Cyril Scetbon
Le 14 janv. 2014 à 08:38, David Tinker david.tin...@gmail.com a écrit :
We never delete rows but we do a lot of updates. Is that where the
tombstones are coming from?
We are seeing the exact same exception in our logs. Is there any workaround?
We never delete rows but we do a lot of updates. Is that where the
tombstones are coming from?
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Sanjeeth Kumar sanje...@exotel.in wrote:
Hi all,
One of my cassandra nodes crashes with
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Edward Capriolo edlinuxg...@gmail.comwrote:
I have to hijack this thread. There seem to be many problems with the
2.0.3 release.
+1. There is no 2.0.x release I consider production ready, even after
today's 2.0.4.
Outside of passing all unit tests, factors
Thanks for the replies.
I dont think this is just a warning , incorrectly logged as an error.
Everytime there is a crash, this is the exact traceback I see in the logs.
I just browsed through the code and the code throws
a TombstoneOverwhelmingException exception in these situations and I did
just browsed through the code and the code throws
a TombstoneOverwhelmingException exception in these situations and I did
not see this being caught and handled some place. I might be wrong though.
But I would also like to understand why this threshold value is important
, so that I can set
for the replies.
I dont think this is just a warning , incorrectly logged as an error.
Everytime there is a crash, this is the exact traceback I see in the logs.
I just browsed through the code and the code throws
a TombstoneOverwhelmingException exception in these situations and I did
not see this being
I do not think the feature is supposed to crash the server. It could be
that the message is the logs and the crash is not related to this message.
WARN might be a better logging level for any message, even though the first
threshold is WARN and the second is FAIL. ERROR is usually something more
Hi all,
One of my cassandra nodes crashes with the following exception
periodically -
ERROR [HintedHandoff:33] 2013-12-25 20:29:22,276 SliceQueryFilter.java
(line 200) Scanned over 10 tombstones; query aborted (see
tombstone_fail_thr
eshold)
ERROR [HintedHandoff:33] 2013-12-25 20:29:22,278
Sanjeeth,
Looks like the error is being populated from the hintedhandoff, what is the
size of your hints cf?
Thanks
Rahul
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Sanjeeth Kumar sanje...@exotel.in wrote:
Hi all,
One of my cassandra nodes crashes with the following exception
periodically -
ERROR
I have to hijack this thread. There seem to be many problems with the 2.0.3
release. If this exception is being generated by hinted-handoff, I could
understand where it is coming from. If you have many hints and many
tombstones then this new feature interacts with the hint delivery process,
in a
It's a feature:
In the stock cassandra.yaml file for 2.03 see:
# When executing a scan, within or across a partition, we need to keep the
# tombstones seen in memory so we can return them to the coordinator, which
# will use them to make sure other replicas also know about the deleted
rows.
22 matches
Mail list logo
