Thanks
A
-
Aaron Morton
Freelance Cassandra Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com
On 12 May 2011, at 03:44, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Close: the problem is we don't count *any* true positives *unless*
> cache is enabled.
>
> Fix attached to https://issues.apache.org/
Close: the problem is we don't count *any* true positives *unless*
cache is enabled.
Fix attached to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2637.
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Chris Burroughs
wrote:
> On 05/10/2011 10:24 PM, aaron morton wrote:
>> What version and what were the value
On 05/10/2011 10:24 PM, aaron morton wrote:
> What version and what were the values for RecentBloomFilterFalsePositives and
> BloomFilterFalsePositives ?
>
> The bloom filter metrics are updated in SSTableReader.getPosition() the only
> slightly odd thing I can see is that we do not count a key
Sorry aaron, here are the values you requested
RecentBloomFilterFalsePositives = 5;
BloomFilterFalsePositives = 385260;
uptime of the node is three days and a half, more or less
El mié, 11-05-2011 a las 22:05 +1200, aaron morton escribió:
> What are the values for RecentBloomFilterFalsePositiv
What are the values for RecentBloomFilterFalsePositives and
BloomFilterFalsePositives the non ratio ones ?
-
Aaron Morton
Freelance Cassandra Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com
On 11 May 2011, at 19:53, Héctor Izquierdo Seliva wrote:
> El mié, 11-05-2011 a las
El mié, 11-05-2011 a las 14:24 +1200, aaron morton escribió:
> What version and what were the values for RecentBloomFilterFalsePositives and
> BloomFilterFalsePositives ?
>
> The bloom filter metrics are updated in SSTableReader.getPosition() the only
> slightly odd thing I can see is that we do
What version and what were the values for RecentBloomFilterFalsePositives and
BloomFilterFalsePositives ?
The bloom filter metrics are updated in SSTableReader.getPosition() the only
slightly odd thing I can see is that we do not count a key cache hit a a true
positive for the bloom filter. If
On 05/10/2011 02:12 PM, Peter Schuller wrote:
>> That reminds me, my false positive ration is stuck at 1.0, so I guess
>> bloom filters aren't doing a lot for me.
>
> That sounds unlikely unless you're hitting some edge case like reading
> a particular row that happened to be a collision, and only
> That reminds me, my false positive ration is stuck at 1.0, so I guess
> bloom filters aren't doing a lot for me.
That sounds unlikely unless you're hitting some edge case like reading
a particular row that happened to be a collision, and only that row.
This is from JMX stats on the column family
El lun, 09-05-2011 a las 17:58 +0200, Peter Schuller escribió:
> > I have a few sstables with around 500 million keys, and memory usage has
> > grown a lot, I suppose because of the indexes. This sstables are
> > comprised of skinny rows, but a lot of them. Would tuning index interval
> > make the
> I have a few sstables with around 500 million keys, and memory usage has
> grown a lot, I suppose because of the indexes. This sstables are
> comprised of skinny rows, but a lot of them. Would tuning index interval
> make the memory usage go down? And what would the performance hit be?
Assuming
Hi everyone.
I have a few sstables with around 500 million keys, and memory usage has
grown a lot, I suppose because of the indexes. This sstables are
comprised of skinny rows, but a lot of them. Would tuning index interval
make the memory usage go down? And what would the performance hit be?
I
12 matches
Mail list logo
