Re: VFS problem with StaticUserAuthenticator

Stephan Schuster-3 wrote: > > so i checked out the code of > webdavclient4j and fixed it along with the implementation of an > additional provider: webdavs (webdav over https). afterwards i posted > the patch to the website's forum [3] and sent it per mail to jason > harrop. so far he obvio

Re: FileUpload - the download's md5 does not match apache's md5

Thanks for all the responses. Upon further checking, my browser(Safari 2.0.4) automatically unzips files after downloading them, so the md5 I was getting: MD5 (/Users/me/Desktop/commons-fileupload-1.2.1-bin.tar) = 1dd142e03ac3703f727bc3b9367d9a74 did not match Apache's md5: d8cccd7b9938c17

Re: FileUpload - the download's md5 does not match apache's md5

On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 16:28 -0400, Rahul Akolkar wrote: > On 6/5/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > The FileUpload download page here: > > > > http://commons.apache.org/downloads/download_fileupload.cgi > > > > says: > > > > ...you must verify the integrity o

Re: FileUpload - the download's md5 does not match apache's md5

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, The FileUpload download page here: http://commons.apache.org/downloads/download_fileupload.cgi says: ...you must verify the integrity of the downloaded files using signatures downloaded from our main distribution directories. I downloaded the file: Binary ---

Re: FileUpload - the download's md5 does not match apache's md5

On 6/5/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > The FileUpload download page here: > > http://commons.apache.org/downloads/download_fileupload.cgi > > says: > > ...you must verify the integrity of the downloaded files using signatures > downloaded from our main distributio

FileUpload - the download's md5 does not match apache's md5

Hi, The FileUpload download page here: http://commons.apache.org/downloads/download_fileupload.cgi says: ...you must verify the integrity of the downloaded files using signatures downloaded from our main distribution directories. I downloaded the file: Binary ---1.2.1.tar.gz from 4 differe

Re: How can I split a List into sub-lists

The right answer is : you can do it yourself, with or without class. For instance (pseudocode) : left = list.sublist(0,middle) right = list.sublist(middle,end) for i in {0..length} result.add(new list({left(i),right(i)})) that difficult? Claude Le jeudi 05 juin 2008 à 20:41 +0200, Zso

How can I split a List into sub-lists

Hi, I would like to split a list like below: {A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3} into { {A1 B1} {A2 B2} {A3 B3} } Which class can do that? Zsolt - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT

Status on Commons Net 2.0 FTPSClient (FTP/S Client): completeness, compliance & maturity

Hi folks, I just discovered a little gem of an FTP/S Client extremely well hidden in Apache-land, I'm talking about the FTP/S Client support provided within the context of Commons Net 2.0. Unfortunately all I came up with right now is with an URL with the SVN source repository, without any other

Re: VFS problem with StaticUserAuthenticator

Hi Stephan, I'm french and I'm not so good in english. So I have a question: Is the code working with a newer version of httpclient than 2.0.2or must I use the patch you have posted to the forum ? Thanks a lot for your help, Yannick 2008/6/5 Stephan Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

Re: VFS problem with StaticUserAuthenticator

hi yannick, the short answer: i had the same problem about a week ago and fixed it! the long answer: as you probably know commons-vfs uses jakarta slide for its webdav support. however, jakarta slide unfortunately retired at the of 2007. that's why jason harrop startet webdavclient4j [1] a few

VFS problem with StaticUserAuthenticator

Hi, I'm using commons VFS and I get a problem. To access to virtual file system, I'm using this authentification : this.auth = new StaticUserAuthenticator(credentials.getDomain(), credentials.getUsername(), credentials.getPassword()); This code works whith smb protocol (share windows), but does

Re: [SCXML] - XPATH

Excellent Many Thks Lawrence Yau Lawrence wrote: Hello Pascal, The simplest way to correct the problem is to change your datamodel definition to use an unnamed namespace for your poolconfiguration XML tree: ... toto 1 ... Then your xpath e

RE: [SCXML] - XPATH

Hello Pascal, The simplest way to correct the problem is to change your datamodel definition to use an unnamed namespace for your poolconfiguration XML tree: ... toto 1 ... Then your xpath expression will work. I tested your SCXML document j

Re: [POOL] you can return your object several times?

kpetrov wrote: I tested a simple scenario where I return the same object several times: PoolableJmsTemplateFactory pjtf = new PoolableJmsTemplateFactory(); pjtf.setConnectionFactory(connectionFactory); ObjectPool pool = new SoftReferenceObjectPool(

Re: [Telnet] how to determine the prompt?

Hello Uwe, You can use whatever you want for prompt. For exemple, you can use a (unique) sequence like: PS1="#HELLO WORLD123456789#>" export PS1 So if you receive the string (with a '\n' a #HELLO WORLD123456789#> after your command, that means the command is finished. On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2

Re: Regarding the FileUpload project, how to get charset info from FileItemStream?

Jason Wang wrote: Hi there, I just started using the fileupload API to write a REST API a couple of days ago. Now I run into a problem: I don't know how to get the charset from uploaded files when using the streaming API. For example, I can upload files using httpclient library via a multi

SCXML - XPATH

Hello, I'm a perfect newbie to sxcml, so i'm probably asking stupid questions ! I'm trying to get access to the content of a datamodel from within the scxml document and a custom action : Here is the dummy state machine: http://www.w3.org/2005/07/scxml"; version="1.0" xmlns:mc="htt

Re: [POOL] you can return your object several times?

sebb wrote: On 04/06/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: sebb wrote: On 03/06/2008, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: kpetrov wrote: Mark Thomas-18 wrote: kpetrov wrote: I tested a simple scenario where I return the sam