You should be building with Maven 2. I have not tested the ant build
to actually see what it does.
On Feb 10, 2009, at 7:07 PM, Manish Saroha wrote:
Hi,
I did an update and saw that the webdav providers have been removed
from the vfs-provider.xml and moved to the default provider.xml.
I
Yeah, that makes sense. The part that was confusing me is that if I have...
public class Thing {
private List children;
}
I was assuming I would need to prefix all of my expressions "steps" with
'/children'. From what you said earlier this is not the case as collections
are "auto traversed/l
It should be as simple as Thing _containing_ a List rather than _being_
a List. Composition over inheritance, do you see?
HTH,
Matt
--- On Tue, 2/10/09, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> From: Andrew Hughes
> Subject: Re: JXPath over Generic Collection, How?
> To: "Commons Users List" , gudnabr...@ya
Hey guys!
I want to create a file using commons-io-LockableFileWriter. I found that
java.io.File.deleteOnExit() is used for file-locking.
Java API says that:
this method should not be used for file-locking, as the resulting protocol
cannot be made to work reliably.
So, should I use LockableFile
Hi,
I did an update and saw that the webdav providers have been removed from
the vfs-provider.xml and moved to the default provider.xml.
I builded a new jar file and am using that but still the same error
message. Also, I cant locate the provider.xml in the jar file. do I need
to modify the
Matt, Thank You.
Is there any other data structure I can use that would work with JXPath? My
requirement is that... a "Thing" can have contain multiple child "Thing(s)"
(and the children are allowed to be non-unique).
This is equivalent to an XML element as it can contain multiple child
elements,
I think you are dead on.
Unfortunately, based on the experience with JAMA and Colt, in-place updates
have two known outcomes ... either the API becomes enormous because of the
factorial nature of the required operations or it becomes fairly abstract as
in the case with Colt. In the abstract case,
I admit I hadn't looked at this with a highly critical eye, but this business
of Thing extending ArrayList seems quite strange to me. JXPath
basically functions by "opening up" collections automatically, so the very fact
that Thing is itself a Collection implies that a Thing will be opened up,
My mistake, you probably can't do multiple in place. However, there are
other operations which you can (e.g., scalar multiply), and those also
create copies.
Dan
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Dan F wrote:
> Folks,
>
> Thanks for your work on Apache commons.
>
> It seems to me that Apache com
-- Forwarded message --
From: Lars Eilebrecht
Date: 10 Feb 2009 01:42
Subject: ApacheCon Training info - please forward to your user lists
To: p...@apache.org
Dear PMC chair and members,
please help us advertise ApacheCon and send the following
announcement to your project's u
Still busted. Example is now simplified. As soon as a generic Collection
becomes involved BOOM!
The Main Method to exec:
public class App {
public static void main( String[] args ){
JXPathContext context = JXPathContext.newContext(new ThingRoot());
System.out.println(((Thing)co
11 matches
Mail list logo
