On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Paul Davis
wrote:
> Quoting Bob from another thread:
>
> blackrock.com employ incompetent sysadmins. This has been
> happening for weeks, to a large number of people. They've also
> polluted JIRA with this too.
>
> blackrock.com does *not* control Apache mailing l
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Miles Fidelman
wrote:
> just posted something to user@couchdb.apache.org, got the following in reply
> - whoever manages the list should probably look into this (unless a venture
> capital fund really is taking over list services for apache.org)
>
There was a thr
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 6:48 AM, Keith Gable wrote:
> Oops:
>
>> Any
>> distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains
>> by
>> other than an intended recipient is unauthorized.
>
> I have yet to get this but maybe it's because it could be getting marked as
> junk by Gm
Hi,
I've seen several references to separating users into individual
couchdb databases, and I think that may work well for my purposes, but
how do I avoid having 1 million sockets long polling on _changes if I
have 1 million users/custs/databases?
Thanks
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Randall Leeds wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 16:15, Chad George wrote:
>> I've been wondering about this for a while, when two update requests for the
>> same document come to couchdb nearly simultaneously what exactly happens?
>>
>> Is it possible for both requ
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> node.js + CouchDB == Crazy Delicious by Mikeal Rogers
> http://jsconf.eu/2010/speaker/nodejs_couchdb_crazy_delicious.html
>
> I was watching this a couple days ago and I've been thinking about how
> to deal with instance a
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 4:02 AM, Wordit Ltd wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>
>> function(newDoc, oldDoc, userCtX) {
>> if(userCtx.roles.indexOf("_admin") == -1) { // not an admin
>> if(newDoc.field > oldDoc.field) { // your condition is this
>> thr
node.js + CouchDB == Crazy Delicious by Mikeal Rogers
http://jsconf.eu/2010/speaker/nodejs_couchdb_crazy_delicious.html
I was watching this a couple days ago and I've been thinking about how
to deal with instance and service (think of sending emails as a
"service") failures. Because it's easy to
On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 3:42 PM, Luciano Ramalho wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 9:14 PM, Robert Newson
> wrote:
>> "If you really need transactions in the classical, RDBMS sense, where
>> you need to update a bunch of related records in one atomic operation,
>> then CouchDB is not for you."
>>
On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Gabriel Farrell wrote:
> If you're wondering how to do this for a CouchApp, you might look at
> the setup Mikeal talks about (NodeJS behind CouchDB) at
> http://jsconf.eu/2010/speaker/nodejs_couchdb_crazy_delicious.html
> (especially at around 12:15).
>
Does he or
10 matches
Mail list logo
