Re: Project Fauxton Feedback

2015-09-16 Thread Eli Stevens (Gmail)
Where is the appropriate place to file bugs against Fuaxton? Most recent I see in JIRA is Feb. 15th of this year. As of a couple of hours ago when I updated my install, the view query options UI wasn't respecting start and end keys (though the link to the raw JSON is correct). On Wed, Aug 19, 201

Re: Project Fauxton Feedback

2015-08-19 Thread Eli Stevens (Gmail)
I agree with kexpal's comment on the PR; large documents would make this very, very painful. I was asking for a view checkbox that would result in a 3rd column for view results (key / value / optional doc) that defaulted to off, so that I could include it when appropriate. Cheers, Eli On Wed, Au

Re: Project Fauxton Feedback

2015-08-19 Thread Alexander Gabriel
+1 2015-08-19 17:26 GMT+02:00 Robert Kowalski : > Thank you for your feedback! > > Based on the feedback we will try to enable `include_docs` per default: > > https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/499 > > What do you think? > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 9:55 AM, James Dingwall > wrote: >

Re: Project Fauxton Feedback

2015-08-19 Thread Robert Kowalski
Thank you for your feedback! Based on the feedback we will try to enable `include_docs` per default: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton/pull/499 What do you think? On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 9:55 AM, James Dingwall wrote: > Eli Stevens (Gmail) wrote: >> >> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:11 AM,

Re: Project Fauxton Feedback

2015-08-19 Thread James Dingwall
Eli Stevens (Gmail) wrote: On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:11 AM, James Dingwall wrote: I get the impression that more whizzy effects (fade in/out, sliding divs etc) have been added which don't play nicely with remote sessions with low bandwidth so a preference to use more basic transitions would be

Re: Project Fauxton Feedback

2015-08-18 Thread Eli Stevens (Gmail)
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:11 AM, James Dingwall wrote: > I get the impression that more whizzy effects (fade in/out, sliding divs > etc) have been added which don't play nicely with remote sessions with > low bandwidth so a preference to use more basic transitions would be useful. +1 Note that i

Re: Project Fauxton Feedback

2015-08-18 Thread James Dingwall
James Dingwall wrote: Hi, Following suggestions that I should try a more recent version of faxuton I have updated some observations. I was able to easily install via npm and point it to a CouchDB 1.6.1 installation. Michelle Phung wrote: One of the things I would like to cover in my presentat

Re: Project Fauxton Feedback

2015-08-17 Thread Michelle Phung
> Where should I be listening to hear about when new > fauxton releases have happened? We don’t really do releases. We push to the repo, and then people can pull from there. https://github.com/apache/couchdb-fauxton Sometimes things break, but we try to fix them right away on the master branch,

Re: Project Fauxton Feedback

2015-08-17 Thread Eli Stevens (Gmail)
Hi Michelle, Overall, sounds great. I'll reply inline where needed: On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Michelle Phung wrote: > Feedback #2: Default _all_docs page doesn’t show enough relevant information > Fair enough, this is something I think we should default with > include_docs=true,

Re: Project Fauxton Feedback

2015-08-17 Thread Michelle Phung
Hi Eli! Thanks for your writeup! These feedback things are things we need to hear multiple times, to really drive the message home, so that we can be better, address real life problems, and also so that we can be held accountable for what we do. Let me know if I’ve misinterpreted any of the

Re: Project Fauxton Feedback

2015-08-14 Thread Eli Stevens (Gmail)
Hi, Thanks for asking for user feedback! I just installed the default new(ish?) fauxton via npm, etc. from the instructions at https://www.npmjs.com/package/fauxton (not sure if that's as up to date as it could be). Here are my (hopefully constructive) opinions. In general, I agree with a lot of

Re: Project Fauxton Feedback

2015-08-14 Thread Michelle Phung
gin forwarded message: > > > > From: James Dingwall > > Subject: Re: Project Fauxton Feedback > > Date: August 14, 2015 at 11:26:04 AM EDT > > To: , > > Reply-To: user@couchdb.apache.org > > > > Michelle Phung wrote: > > > > One of the t

Re: Project Fauxton Feedback

2015-08-14 Thread Alexander Shorin
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 6:39 PM, James Dingwall wrote: > Alexander Shorin wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 6:26 PM, James Dingwall >> wrote: >>> >>> My experience of using the version of fauxton bundled in CouchDB 1.6.1 >>> (with >>> SeaMonkey 2.33.1 in case its a browser thing...) >> >> You

Re: Project Fauxton Feedback

2015-08-14 Thread James Dingwall
Alexander Shorin wrote: On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 6:26 PM, James Dingwall wrote: My experience of using the version of fauxton bundled in CouchDB 1.6.1 (with SeaMonkey 2.33.1 in case its a browser thing...) You definitely should try the latest Fauxton[1] (better with 2.0[2]) because their codeba

Re: Project Fauxton Feedback

2015-08-14 Thread Alexander Shorin
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 6:26 PM, James Dingwall wrote: > My experience of using the version of fauxton bundled in CouchDB 1.6.1 (with > SeaMonkey 2.33.1 in case its a browser thing...) You definitely should try the latest Fauxton[1] (better with 2.0[2]) because their codebase difference cover one

Re: Project Fauxton Feedback

2015-08-14 Thread James Dingwall
Michelle Phung wrote: One of the things I would like to cover in my presentation is what CouchDB as a community, would like to see implemented in Fauxton, and what can be improved. My experience of using the version of fauxton bundled in CouchDB 1.6.1 (with SeaMonkey 2.33.1 in case its a brows

Project Fauxton Feedback

2015-08-14 Thread Michelle Phung
Hello! I am at the beginning of writing a presentation that I am hoping to name: "The State of Fauxton 2015", and I would like to include community concerns about Project Fauxton, and where we hope it will go. One of the things I would like to cover in my presentation is what CouchDB as a commun