Re: SNI issue

2022-12-08 Thread Yanfei Lei
Hi, I didn't face this issue, and I'm guessing it might have something to do with the configuration of SSL[1], have you configured the "security.ssl.rest.enabled" option? [1] https://cnightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-master/docs/deployment/security/security-ssl/#configuring-ssl Jean-Damien

Re: Exceeded Checkpoint tolerable failure

2022-12-08 Thread Yanfei Lei
Hi Madan, Maybe you can check the value of " *execution.checkpointing.tolerable-failed-checkpoints"*[1] in your application configuration, and try to increase this value? [1] https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-docs-release-1.14/docs/deployment/config/#execution-checkpointing-tolerable-fail

Re: Exceeded Checkpoint tolerable failure

2022-12-08 Thread Hangxiang Yu
Hi, Madan. I think there is a root cause of the exception, could you share it ? BTW, If you don't set a value for execution.checkpointing.tolerable-failed-checkpoints, I'd recommend you to set it which could avoid job restart due to some recoverable temporary problems. [1] https://nightlies.apache

Re: Could not restore keyed state backend for KeyedProcessOperator

2022-12-08 Thread Hangxiang Yu
Hi, Lars. Could you check whether you have configured the lifecycle of google cloud storage[1] which is not recommended in the flink checkpoint usage? [1] https://cloud.google.com/storage/docs/lifecycle On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 2:02 AM Lars Skjærven wrote: > Hello, > We had an incident today with

Re: ZLIB Vulnerability Exposure in Flink statebackend RocksDB

2022-12-08 Thread Vidya Sagar Mula
Thank you Yanfei for taking this issue as a bug and planning a fix in the upcoming version. I have another vulnerability bug coming on our product. It is related to the "LZ4" compression library version. Can you please take a look at this link? https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-17543 I ha

Could not restore keyed state backend for KeyedProcessOperator

2022-12-08 Thread Lars Skjærven
Hello, We had an incident today with a job that could not restore after crash (for unknown reason). Specifically, it fails due to a missing checkpoint file. We've experienced this a total of three times with Flink 1.15.2, but never with 1.14.x. Last time was during a node upgrade, but that was not

Re: Deterministic co-results

2022-12-08 Thread Salva Alcántara
Hi Alexis, Thanks a lot for your reply & guidance, which makes a lot of sense to me overall. Regards, Salva On Thu, Dec 8, 2022 at 5:34 PM Alexis Sarda-Espinosa < sarda.espin...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Salva, > > Just to give you further thoughts from another user, I think the "temporal > join"

KafkaSource and Event Time in Message Payload

2022-12-08 Thread Niklas Wilcke
Hi Flink Community, I have a few questions regarding the new KafkaSource and event time, which I wasn't able to answer myself via checking the docs, but please point me to the right pages in case I missed something. I'm not entirely whether my knowledge entirely holds for the new KafkaSource, b

Re: Deterministic co-results

2022-12-08 Thread Alexis Sarda-Espinosa
Hi Salva, Just to give you further thoughts from another user, I think the "temporal join" semantics are very critical in this use case, and what you implement for that may not easily generalize to other cases. Because of that, I'm not sure if you can really define best practices that apply in gen

Re: Accessing kafka message key from a KafkaSource

2022-12-08 Thread Noel OConnor
Thanks, I'll try that. On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 7:19 PM Yaroslav Tkachenko wrote: > > Hi Noel, > > It's definitely possible. You need to implement a custom > KafkaRecordDeserializationSchema: its "deserialize" method gives you a > ConsumerRecord as an argument so that you can extract Kafka messag

RE: Deterministic co-results

2022-12-08 Thread Salva Alcántara
Just for adding some extra references: [5] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50536364/apache-flink-coflatmapfunction-does-not-process-events-in-event-time-order [6] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/61046062/controlling-order-of-processed-elements-within-coprocessfunction-using-custom-so [7] h

Re: Cleanup for high-availability.storageDir

2022-12-08 Thread Matthias Pohl via user
Yes, the wrong button was pushed when replying last time. -.- Looking into the code once again [1], you're right. It looks like for "last-state", no job is cancelled but the cluster deployment is just deleted. I was assuming that the artifacts the documentation about the JobResultStore resource le

Re: Query about flink job manager dashboard

2022-12-08 Thread naga sudhakar
Is it possible to disable to dashboard port running, but still api running on different port? Let us know if we can configure this? On Mon, 5 Dec, 2022, 6:08 AM naga sudhakar, wrote: > Any suggestions for these apis to work after applying these configuration? > Basically I suspect webupload dire

Re: Cleanup for high-availability.storageDir

2022-12-08 Thread Alexis Sarda-Espinosa
Hi Matthias, I think you didn't include the mailing list in your response. According to my experiments, using last-state means the operator simply deletes the Flink pods, and I believe that doesn't count as Cancelled, so the artifacts for blobs and submitted job graphs are not cleaned up. I imagi

Re: K8S operator support status

2022-12-08 Thread Márton Balassi
Hi Ruibin, 1. Standalone is indeed supported since 1.2 ( https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-docs-main/docs/custom-resource/overview/#cluster-deployment-modes), I will correct the Known issues, that is just an oversight that we left it there - thanks for reporting. 2. Reac

K8S operator support status

2022-12-08 Thread Ruibin Xing
Hi community, I'm looking into the Flink K8s operator documents, and I'm a bit confused about the following: 1. The latest document ( https://nightlies.apache.org/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-docs-main/docs/concepts/overview/) says that Kubernetes standalone mode is not supported