RE: Reducing Checkpoint Count for Chain Operator

2023-02-01 Thread Schwalbe Matthias
Hi Kishore, Having followed this thread for a while it is still quite a bit of confusion of concepts and in order to help resolve your original we would need to know, * what makes your observation a problem to be solved? * You write, you have no shuffling, does that mean you don’t use a

Re: Reducing Checkpoint Count for Chain Operator

2023-02-01 Thread Kishore Pola
Hi Weijie, In our case we do have 7 operators. All the 7 operators are getting executed as one chain within a single StreamTask. As checkpoint barrier is passing through all the operators, there are 7 checkpoints being stored. So our checkpoint size is up by 7 times. We are investigating to see

Re: Reducing Checkpoint Count for Chain Operator

2023-02-01 Thread weijie guo
Hi Talat, In Flink, a checkpoint barrier will be injected from source, and then pass through all operators in turn. Each stateful operator will do checkpoint in this process, the state is managed at operator granularity, not operator chain. So what is the significance of checkpoint based on the gr

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Flink 1.16.1 released

2023-02-01 Thread weijie guo
Thank Martin for managing the release and all the people involved. Best regards, Weijie Konstantin Knauf 于2023年2月2日周四 06:40写道: > Great. Thanks, Martijn for managing the release. > > Am Mi., 1. Feb. 2023 um 20:26 Uhr schrieb Martijn Visser < > martijnvis...@apache.org>: > > > The Apache Flink

Non-temporal watermarks

2023-02-01 Thread Yaroslav Tkachenko
Hey everyone, I'm wondering if anyone has done any experiments trying to use non-temporal watermarks? For example, a dataset may contain some kind of virtual timestamp / version field that behaves just like a regular timestamp (monotonically increasing, etc.), but has a different scale / range. A

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Flink 1.16.1 released

2023-02-01 Thread Konstantin Knauf
Great. Thanks, Martijn for managing the release. Am Mi., 1. Feb. 2023 um 20:26 Uhr schrieb Martijn Visser < martijnvis...@apache.org>: > The Apache Flink community is very happy to announce the release of Apache > Flink 1.16.1, which is the first bugfix release for the Apache Flink 1.16 > series.

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Flink 1.16.1 released

2023-02-01 Thread Martijn Visser
The Apache Flink community is very happy to announce the release of Apache Flink 1.16.1, which is the first bugfix release for the Apache Flink 1.16 series. Apache Flink® is an open-source stream processing framework for distributed, high-performing, always-available, and accurate data streaming a

Re: Reducing Checkpoint Count for Chain Operator

2023-02-01 Thread Talat Uyarer via user
Hi Weijie, Thanks for replying back. Our job is a streaming job. The OperatorChain contains all operators that are executed as one chain within a single StreamTask. But each operator creates their own checkpoint at checkpointing time . Rather than creating a checkpoint per operator in checkpoint

Re: beam + flink + k8

2023-02-01 Thread P Singh
Hi Jan, Thanks for the reply, I was able to submit the job to flink but it's failing due to an OOM issue so I am moving to the GKE. I got the flink UI there but submitted a job not appearing on flink UI. I am using the same script which I shared with you.. Do I need to make some changes for Google

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Query on flink-operator autoscale support

2023-02-01 Thread Gyula Fóra
As I mentioned in the previous email, standalone mode is not on the Autoscaler roadmap because the scheduling/resource model is different. This applies to both standalone app and session clusters. Thanks Gyula On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 4:48 PM Swathi Chandrashekar wrote: > Sure, thanks Gyula. > Is

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Query on flink-operator autoscale support

2023-02-01 Thread Swathi Chandrashekar via user
Sure, thanks Gyula. Is there a roadmap to support standalone session clusters to scale based on the jobs added/deleted and change in parallelism ? Regards, Swathi C From: Gyula Fóra Sent: Wednesday, February 1, 2023 8:54 PM To: Swathi Chandrashekar Cc: user@fli

Re: Query on flink-operator autoscale support

2023-02-01 Thread Gyula Fóra
The autoscaler currently only works with Native App clusters. Native session clusters may be supported in the future but standalone is not on our roadmap due to a different resource/scheduling model used. Gyula On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 4:22 PM Swathi Chandrashekar wrote: > Hi, > > I'm was testing

Query on flink-operator autoscale support

2023-02-01 Thread Swathi Chandrashekar via user
Hi, I'm was testing OSS flink operator with flink 1.17 for autoscale feature. I was able to scale the cluster based on load in application cluster in native mode, but the same did not work in standalone mode as the operator gave the following error as below [ both for app and session mode ]. I

Re: OOM taskmanager

2023-02-01 Thread weijie guo
Hi Marco, I think you may need to do heap-dump for TM to check whether there is memory leak. Best regards, Weijie

Re: Reducing Checkpoint Count for Chain Operator

2023-02-01 Thread weijie guo
Hi Talat, Can you elaborate on what it means to create one checkpoint object per chain operator more than all operators? If you mean to do checkpoint independently for each task, this is not supported. Best regards, Weijie Talat Uyarer via user 于2023年2月1日周三 15:34写道: > Hi, > > We have a job