Hey Kristoffer,
sorry for the late reply. I was on vacation.
Here you can find my initial email that also contains a description and
a link to the patch:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/compiler-dev/2015-January/009220.html
The Eclipse JDT team didn't really need a patch. Their
Hi Kristoffer,
I'm afraid not, but maybe Timo has some further information. In this
extended example we can see the problem:
https://gist.github.com/aljoscha/84cc363d13cf1dfe9364. The output is:
Type is: class org.apache.flink.examples.java8.wordcount.TypeTest$Thing
class
Wow, that looks super interesting.
Will try that out later.
Thanks for sharing :-)
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Kristoffer Sjögren sto...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
Potential fix for writing flink jobs using lamdas without Eclipse JDT?
:-)
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Stephan Ewen se...@apache.org wrote:
Wow, that looks super interesting.
Will try that out later.
Thanks for sharing :-)
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Kristoffer Sjögren sto...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
Potential fix for writing flink jobs using
Hi
Potential fix for writing flink jobs using lamdas without Eclipse JDT?
https://gist.github.com/aslakhellesoy/3678beba60c109eacbe5
Cheers,
-Kristoffer
How about https://github.com/jhalterman/typetools?
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Aljoscha Krettek aljos...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Kristoffer,
I'm afraid not, but maybe Timo has some further information. In this
extended example we can see the problem:
Hi Kristoffer!
I looked through the code as well. In fact, Flink currently uses the trick
mentioned for Serializable Lambdas in the gist you sent me.
This works well for lambdas that return simple types (primitives or classes
without generics). The information for the generic parametrization is
Would have been great. I had high hopes when I saw the trick with the
constant pool, but this is only to make what Flink does already
applicable to non-serializable lambdas.
If you want to help us with this, I'll ping you for some support on the
OpenJDK mailing list ;-)
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at
Timo should still have the patch!
If you want to re-vive the thread, that'd be great. I'd be happy to support
it.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Kristoffer Sjögren sto...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do you have a link to these patches?
Reading through the thread, I get the feeling they didn't
I suspected that you already had looked into this, but it was worth a
try. It would make everything so much easier.
Thanks for the explanation :-)
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Stephan Ewen se...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Kristoffer!
I looked through the code as well. In fact, Flink currently
Yeah, I think I found the thread already... by Timo Walther?
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Stephan Ewen se...@apache.org wrote:
Would have been great. I had high hopes when I saw the trick with the
constant pool, but this is only to make what Flink does already applicable
to
Do you have a link to these patches?
Reading through the thread, I get the feeling they didn't reject the
idea completely.
Considering there are also other projects (Crunch, Spark, Storm, etc)
that would benefit from this, maybe we can convince them together?
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 2:27 PM,
12 matches
Mail list logo
