Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!

2006-03-28 Thread Mario Rübsam
Here my short list: 1) Support for JDK1.5 (both for Geronimo itself and the Geronimo Eclipse plugin) 2) configuration management, possibility to make a production version without some current modules (e.g. OpenEJB or ActiveMQ), there are end useres who don't have the resources (memory,

Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!

2006-03-28 Thread Dain Sundstrom
For everyone that listed "more documentation", can you be more specific? It will help us prioritize the effort to hit the most important stuff first. Thanks, -dain On Mar 28, 2006, at 10:31 PM, mikael-aronsson wrote: Same as below for me - Original Message - From: "Christian Sto

Re: Datasource lookup at Connector Module

2006-03-28 Thread Vamsavardhana Reddy
Do you have to use context.lookup("java:comp/env/jdbc/MyDS") ? -VamsiOn 3/29/06, akiramoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a J2EE application that has a Connector Module, and it has to lookup aDataSource configured at Geronimo. Using WebSphere Application Server 6.0,it is very simple, because th

Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!

2006-03-28 Thread mikael-aronsson
Same as below for me - Original Message - From: "Christian Stolz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 7:36 AM Subject: Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you! Hi there, here is my Top 5: 1. Support for JDK1.5 2. JAX-WS support 3. More documentation 4. NetB

Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!

2006-03-28 Thread Christian Stolz
Hi there, here is my Top 5: 1. Support for JDK1.5 2. JAX-WS support 3. More documentation 4. NetBeans support 5. More frequent releases Thanks Christian

Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!

2006-03-28 Thread Olivier Voutat
Well, I'm not a reference but my five are:1) More documentation and example codes (and more understanding, sorry, but it needs to be more clear for stupid newbies as me)2) Java 5.0 support3) Eclipse plugin improvement (it is really good but think it could be better) 4) and more documentati

RE: User Feedback Request -- this means you!

2006-03-28 Thread Joel Bock
I have three requests: (1) More tutorials and example code for _everything_. (2) More detailed documentation about the architecture. (3) A browsable table describing where to find all plans, etc. for each deployed component or service. Thanks, Joel -Original Message- From: David Blevi

RE: User Feedback Request -- this means you!

2006-03-28 Thread Hossam Karim
Here you go, 1- Java 5.0 standard edition support 2- Java 5.0 standard edition support 3- Convince us with the GBean Architecture 4- Return back ServiceMix 5- At least EJB 3.0 and JAX-WS support Thanks, Hossam Karim -Original Message- From: David Blevins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sen

Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!

2006-03-28 Thread ian . d . stewart
This is my personal order based on 1) what I'm using today, and 2) Where I see potential for use in the near future. Obviously, others will have their own priorities. 1) Java Servlet 2.5 2) Java ServerPages 2.1 3) Java ServerPages Standard Tag Library 4) Java Persistence Architecture (is this par

Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!

2006-03-28 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Mar 28, 2006, at 12:50 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2) Implementation of J2EE 1.5 (or JEE 5 or whatever we're calling it these days) JEE 5 is a huge cacophony of specifications. Can you be more specific about which specs you would like to see finished first? -dain

Re: User Feedback Request -- this means you!

2006-03-28 Thread ian . d . stewart
Here are my top five, with the caveat that the order does not necessarily reflect relative priority, just the order that I think of them: 1) Support for JDK1.5 (both for Geronimo itself and the Geronimo Eclipse Plugin) 2) Implementation of J2EE 1.5 (or JEE 5 or whatever we're calling it these days

Re: 1.1 Release is gearing up...let's start stting the release goals

2006-03-28 Thread Erik D
Matt, I need the rest of the week to get the installer ready. I have at least two more patches to provide before I'm finished. I should have them done by the end of the week. regards, erik On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 11:04 -0500, Matt Hogstrom wrote: > All, > > Dain and David have mostly completed

Re: Deploy Tool: deploy vs redeploy

2006-03-28 Thread Dain Sundstrom
I think we are overthinking this issue. I can't remember a single time I deployed something and didn't want the a currently installed version redeployed. I say just alias redeploy to deploy. If people want to write specific scripts for deploy they can always use the "distribute" and "sta

User Feedback Request -- this means you!

2006-03-28 Thread David Blevins
So this is the first of what I think should be a quarterly event. Geronimo is ultimately your project and we committers are but your humble servants. To serve you best, we need some critical high level feedback to help us steer the project and focus on what matters most to you! Please,

Datasource lookup at Connector Module

2006-03-28 Thread akiramoto
I have a J2EE application that has a Connector Module, and it has to lookup a DataSource configured at Geronimo. Using WebSphere Application Server 6.0, it is very simple, because the only thing that I have to do is to use the Context.lookup (for example. context.lookup("jdbc/MyDS") ). But this lo

Re: Deploy Tool: deploy vs redeploy

2006-03-28 Thread Hiram Chirino
I think lots of folks hate getting prompted by console programs. Thats' why rm has a -f option. And why brave folks do a: alias rm 'rm -f' On 3/28/06, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/25/06, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think we all agree that the easier for the us

1.1 Release is gearing up...let's start stting the release goals

2006-03-28 Thread Matt Hogstrom
All, Dain and David have mostly completed their work in branches/1.1. Given that the easy part of the change has been done its time to start thinking about getting 1.1 out the door. The theme for 1.1 I think is appropriate is bug fixes, performance improvements and new features. Here is t

Re: Deploy Tool: deploy vs redeploy

2006-03-28 Thread Paul McMahan
On 3/25/06, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think we all agree that the easier for the user the better. > > Having one deploy command smart enough to deploy or redeploy based on the > current status would be > cool as Aaron suggested. I think it would also be nice, if the command is

RE: Release Management

2006-03-28 Thread Bradford, Jeff L
Thanks for the info Sachin. -Original Message- From: Sachin Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 8:47 AM To: user@geronimo.apache.org Subject: Re: Release Management FYI The eclipse update manager can be run headlessly and it can be used not just to install "f

RE: Release Management

2006-03-28 Thread Bradford, Jeff L
My reference to "the Eclipse > Software Update option" below was just an example reference to a nice easy pull solution to version upgrades. I was wondering if Geronimo had any plans of offering some type of migration solution (i.e. executable, script, etc.) to expedite version migrations for the

Re: Release Management

2006-03-28 Thread Sachin Patel
FYI The eclipse update manager can be run headlessly and it can be used not just to install "features/plugins" but it can be used to install any type of archive and to any target with the use of custom InstallHandlers so technically it could be used to update G. I don't know offhand how muc

Re: Deploy Tool: deploy vs redeploy

2006-03-28 Thread David Carew
Another idea is to make the default for something like "--strict" configurable in config.xml and ship it "out the box"  with "--strict false" as the default.  In production you probably want to make changes to the default config anyway, e.g. turn off hot deploy. So this could just be something els

Re: ejb finder method with "IS NULL"

2006-03-28 Thread Gianny Damour
Hi, You can easily see all the SELECT statements executed under the cover of a CMP by putting a breaking in org.tranql.sql.jdbc.JDBCQueryCommand.execute. Hopefully, you will then be able to back-track the problem. It is quite annoying that there are no debug or trace logs available to help

Re: ejb finder method with "IS NULL"

2006-03-28 Thread Milan Unger
Hello, I assumed similar and have checked code and inspected db data whole time, but it is not changing. Originally, I assumed that this is due to wrong CMR declarations, but when using business method based on CMR fields (loop over all Category ejbs with getParent()==null) instead of the finder m

Re: ejb finder method with "IS NULL"

2006-03-28 Thread Gianny Damour
Hello, This is very strange and I cannot explain it. Your query: SELECT OBJECT(o) FROM Category o WHERE o.parent IS NULL is compiled into a SELECT statement like this: SELECT o.categoryid FROM category_table o WHERE (NOT EXISTS (SELECT 0 FROM category_table T0 WHERE T0.categoryid = o.parentid)