Sorry if these messages are munged, but I believe the
plans are correct (please still correct me if I'm
wrong).
I believe a new problem has emerged:
-
Exception in thread "Thread-3"
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
javax/servlet/http/HttpSession
at java.lang.ClassLoader.de
Also, does
false
no longer work in geronimo-web.xml following the
tag? Is there a replacement?
Tyler
--- Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> You're right -- gbean-ref only works in 1.1. Your
> GBean needs to
> implement an interface, and the gbean-ref and lookup
> should go by the
> int
Thanks Aaron,
We're still having issues, so I've attached my plans.
ClusterMonitorPlan.xml is for the GBean jar.
- Contains the declaration
geronimo-web.xml is for the ClusterManager-1.0.war
- contains the tag
web.xml is also for the ClusterManager-1.0.war
The interface class is:
org.cait.Cl
I have 1.1 up and running, and am now getting an error
with the :
Error: Unable to distribute example-1.0.war: Could
not
resolve reference at deploy time for queries
[?name=InstanceName#com.example.GBean]
No matches for referencePatterns:
[?name=InstanceName#com.example.GB
Aaron,
Found this note in your book:
The schema includes a placeholder element (gbean-ref)
for GBean references (that is, putting a reference to
an arbitrary GBean in the component's java:comp/env
JNDI space), but that is not yet working in Geronimo
1.0 so it is not covered here.
I guess we need
Thanks!
I tried it, the only problem is the
configuration.
Geronimo does not like . Is this something
specific to Geronimo 1.1?
So now the code is modified correctly, as you have
pointed out, and compiles. However, Geronimo doesn't
like the geronimo-web.xml modifications. Is the
a standalone ta
I have successfully deployed a GBean using a
deployment plan. I have added a new jar to the
repository, and I reference the class in the
deployment plan.
Now, my question is: How do I access the deployed
class via the GBean from my web service/application?
Thanks.
Tyler
Even better!
Tyler
--- Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Tyler,
>
> You shouldn't need any code changes for this. If
> you want to hide
> classes on the server class path from your
> application, just add
> elements to your web plan listing
> the packages you
> want to hide. e.g.:
>
Even better!
Tyler
--- Gianny Damour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Now that I do know that Log4J in also in
> WEB-INF/lib, I think this works:
>
> 1. set context-priority-classloader to false (or do
> not set it at all); and
> 2. add these filters to your geronimo-web.xml DD:
>
>
>
OK, this time my workaround is probably the fix you
guys need to commit into HEAD. Someone can get credit
for submitting a bug with the fix.
Yeah, so the app I'm running also has its own
org.apache.commons.logging and org.apache.log4j, so I
added those entries in the TomcatClassLoader methods
(the
Yeah :(. I tried that, and it isn't working.
Basically, Geronimo says that some appender was loaded
by the TomcatClassLoader and another ConsoleAppender
was loaded by the sun.misc.LancherAppClassLoader.
Here's the full dump:
log4j:ERROR A "org.apache.log4j.ConsoleAppender"
object is not assignable
Note that my application has each of these jars in the
WEB-INF/lib directory. It's strange to me that these
lib files are being ignored, and Geronimo is going to
the repository instead of the ones found there. On top
of that, it is going to the lib directory for some of
the jars, however, it never
I must be misunderstanding something. Here's my
problem. I'm trying to use an application that
requires a different version of jdom.jar and axis.jar,
and it also uses commons-httpclient.jar, which isn't
found in the geronimo repository.
It does some webservices stuff. So I replace the
jdom.jar in
hh, I should join that dev-list.
Thanks!
Tyler
--- Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> We've switched to a new way of building that allows
> for more
> customized distributions of Geronimo. To build the
> most current
> source, you should do something like this (there
> have been more
I'm going to try grabbing the modules/assembly
directory from the stock M5 download.
Tyler
Note: forwarded message attached.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com --- Begin Messag
> What really helped is correcting
> modules/assembly/maven.xml file and
I've done two fresh checkouts in the last few hours,
and NO modules/assembly directory comes with the
checkout. Am I doing something wrong?
Here's the command I use:
svn checkout
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/trun
Hey,
Why is the modules/assembly directory not in the SVN
checkout (svn checkout
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/trunk
geronimo)? I noticed that it was removed between SVN
version 354829 and 354830. I've also noticed a new
modules/scripts directory, but it hasn't been modified
since djenc
OK, I can verify users against the database using the
SQLLoginModule. I've created a servlet (my first one
ever!) that takes in the user information and stores
it into the same table of the database, and adds an
entry to the groups table, too. They can then go to
the login page, login and they even
:( Too bad there aren't tests for the demos before
launching new versions.
Tyler
--- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MagicGball works for me on head. i think the M5
> copy is broken. I
> recently changed it so the app-client to server
> communication is over
> corba rather than th
The unit test does not use the universal DB2 driver. I
think it really should since Geronimo is backed by
IBM. And that way people that use it would have an
example to go by. It uses org.hsqldb as a driver.
Anyways, I have a feeling that the way to get the
database connector as you, David, said be
At the bottom of the login() method in SQLLoginModule:
found should be returned, not true :). My first fix to
Geronimo!
Tyler
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Actually, I found a serious bug, I got an exception
> on
> the executeQuery() statement, and it went to the
> finally{}, returned true, an
Actually, I found a serious bug, I got an exception on
the executeQuery() statement, and it went to the
finally{}, returned true, and gave me access.
This is probably an easy fix, but was just telling you
guys about this hole.
Tyler
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Yee haw! It works, debugging i
Yee haw! It works, debugging in the code is my best
bet at this point.
The DB2 universal driver didn't want the username and
password passed in the URL and as properties.
Thanks all! Now I could easily do the parameterized
username stuff. I'll try modifying it now.
Tyler
--- David Jencks <[EMA
I'm so determined I'm rebuilding M5 with print
statements in the SQLLoginModule file. Something's
clearly wrong with something (dunno what). I may be
narrowing it down. From then I guess I can build my
own modules that will connect to the database the way
I want, no?
If there's a quicker way to re
Yeah, that would be cool. Has anyone done that?
Tyler
--- Miguel A Paraz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/20/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Does anyone know of a way to configure PHP into
> > Geronimo? I think that would be a cool thing to be
> > able to do as well. I s
Lets have some discussion, maybe I'm totally missing
somethings.
Currently I see all/most the applications I've looked
at as J2EE apps. This is the goal of Geronimo, but
they largly bypass the low-level purposes of Geronimo
by just sticking to J2EE and JSP. Though the GBeans
thing is cool. The goa
Yeah, I see a bunch of articles on IBM, some here and
there, but they seem to avoid any and all declarative
security stuff.
Does anyone know of a way to configure PHP into
Geronimo? I think that would be a cool thing to be
able to do as well. I see JSP is built in, as well as
JavaScript. But at le
Thanks David,
OK, so maybe I'm not sure what I need to do to get
what I want done. I want to use Geronimo's
SQLLoginModule class to authenticate users logging in.
I also want to be able to register new users through
Geronimo (if possible).
I can get the GBeans to start in my deployment plan,
but
I want to be able to connect to Derby for password
authentication. I'd like to eventually create a form
where users can register and store their data in the
database. I'm using M5. Here's my deployment command:
java -jar ..\..\bin\deployer.jar --user system
--password manager deploy default-databa
I'm creating a connector and want to use it to connect
to Derby. Not even the connector's that come with
Geronimo work!
The error I'm getting is below.
Thanks!
Tyler
Error: Unable to distribute
default-database-plan.xml: Syntax error
in deployment plan or no deployer service available
(curren
Toby,
Thanks! Yeah it was my problem. I went through the
maven learning curve, as well as the learning where
the new server.jar was supposed to be curve :)
But I definitely know a lot more than I did about
Geronimo! Thanks again for that bugfix for me!!!
Tyler
--- toby cabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ok, I'm looking at the demo app. I can find the user
name passwords, etc. So I've got it up and running on
localhost, but I always get the error page.
I'm sure this is a simple error, or something I
haven't come across yet.
Thanks,
Tyler
--- toby cabot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct
I get it. Thanks for the URL, I'll keep you posted if
I come up with issues.
Also, about the app, I will first focus as though they
have already paid.
Thanks!
Tyler
--- David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some info to get you started is in this
> developerworks article:
>
>
http://www-
I'm looking into building a simple application that
implements the security features of Geronimo that can
later be built upon.
The security aspect I'd like to focus on is limiting
access for certain users to a page, similar to HTTP
authentication.
This brings up a few questions:
- Where are the
34 matches
Mail list logo