David,
This is awesome
Rajan
On 9/10/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sep 7, 2007, at 9:02 PM, Xh wrote:
>
> > Hi David!
> >
> > There were no errors during deployment.
> > Application deploys and starts. Bean does not work.
> >
> > Without name attribute, everything is OK.
On Sep 7, 2007, at 9:02 PM, Xh wrote:
Hi David!
There were no errors during deployment.
Application deploys and starts. Bean does not work.
Without name attribute, everything is OK.
Not sure what you might be doing wrong, but I've created an example
of both @Stateless and @Stateful beans
, 2007 12:44:42 AM
Subject: Re: G2.0.1 @Stateless and @Stateful name parameter ignored?
On Sep 7, 2007, at 1:14 PM, Xh wrote:
> Hi All!
>
> I've encountered a strange thing.
> I've noticed that all @State*(name="Name") definitions are ignored
> by Geronimo
On Sep 7, 2007, at 1:14 PM, Xh wrote:
Hi All!
I've encountered a strange thing.
I've noticed that all @State*(name="Name") definitions are ignored
by Geronimo 2.0.1.
Application deploys successfully, but in JNDI Viewer there are no
session beans.
Simple:
@Stateless(name = "ModuleProxy")
Hi All!
I've encountered a strange thing.
I've noticed that all @State*(name="Name") definitions are ignored by Geronimo
2.0.1.
Application deploys successfully, but in JNDI Viewer there are no session beans.
Simple:
@Stateless(name = "ModuleProxy")
public class ModuleProxyBean implements Modul
