No thank you, of course as I have been thinking about it I do like the
idea of a simple declarative extension point. There would be no
direct coupling and then people are once again able to name their
containers anything they want. Still you know IMHO anyone who puts
their own JRE container and d
Hi James, We're planning an upcoming maintenance release for the plugin. The
current plan is to incorporate your code patch/snippet (that you've provided
below) into that release, and then work on a more long-term solution (e.g., with
an extension point possibly) in a subsequent major release. I
I was wondering if there has been any progress on
GERONIMODEVTOOLS-185. There was some activity in late August, so I
was hoping that the enhancement would have been made already. In fact
I would consider submitting a patch for this but I know that someone
was already assigned it.
Thanks,
James
JIRA GERONIMODEVTOOLS-185 created to track this.
- Shiva
On 8/18/07, Shiva Kumar H R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That's great. I will create a JIRA for this on Monday.
>
> - Shiva
>
> On 8/16/07, James Ervin <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> >
> > I modified the part of the processJavaProject() me
That's great. I will create a JIRA for this on Monday.
- Shiva
On 8/16/07, James Ervin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I modified the part of the processJavaProject() method that deals with
> containers like so:
>
> SharedLibEntryCreationOperation.java:
> processJavaProject()
><--- Beg
I modified the part of the processJavaProject() method that deals with
containers like so:
SharedLibEntryCreationOperation.java:
processJavaProject()
<--- Begin code snippet --->
if( kind == IClasspathEntry.CPE_CONTAINER )
{
if( entry.getPath().segm
Looks like I won't be able to resolve this with my current code knowledge.
Will dig into this more tomorrow.
- Shiva
On 8/15/07, James Ervin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was thinking about this and I believe the reason that the full resolved
> class path is not considered is because it would
I was thinking about this and I believe the reason that the full resolved
class path is not considered is because it would include entries from both
the JRE classpath container and the Web-App Libraries classpath container.
Is this correct? If it is, it would seem easier to just exclude those
clas
I was just following up to see if anyone saw any side effects from
considering the resolved classpath of a java project instead of just the raw
classpath?
Thanks,
James
On 8/13/07, James Ervin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was looking at the method a bit and it seems as though the only
> class
I was looking at the method a bit and it seems as though the only classpath
container that is recognized is the maven classpath container. Perhaps by
using the resolved classpath or by removing the if statement that checks for
the maven classpath container exclusively would be enough. Maybe the c
Oh that would be awesome thanks please let me know of your results
ASAP.
Thanks,
James
On 8/13/07, Shiva Kumar H R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi James,
> Looks like this is what you are looking for (I hit across this by
> searching for "getRawClasspath" in plug-in source):
> "processJ
Hi James,
Looks like this is what you are looking for (I hit across this by searching
for "getRawClasspath" in plug-in source):
"processJavaProject() method of
org.apache.geronimo.st.core.operations.SharedLibEntryCreationOperation.javain
plugins/org.apache.geronimo.st.core"
Now seeing if changing
On 8/8/07, Tim McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi again James, Sorry for the delay but I've been trying to fully
> understand
> what you're trying to accomplish. Have you considered using the shared lib
> support that is already provided by the Geronimo plugin publish/deploy
> functionalit
Hi again James, Sorry for the delay but I've been trying to fully understand
what you're trying to accomplish. Have you considered using the shared lib
support that is already provided by the Geronimo plugin publish/deploy
functionality ?? If I correctly understand what you're trying to accompli
Tim,
Thanks for the reply. Reviewing the plugins installed it looks as though
the plugin is at version 1.0.0 with the
org.apache.geronimo.runtime.v1plugin at version
1.0.1. Hmm I don't see a feature. I am not quite sure the version of
geronimo. It comes bundled and is installed by a script so I
Hi James, which version of Geronimo and the Geronimo plugin are you using ??
Also, do you have an example test app that you could attach that demonstrates
the failure ??
James Ervin wrote:
Hello,
I am a developer working on an Eclipse plugin attempting to use WTP to
help ppl write Service Bas
Hello,
I am a developer working on an Eclipse plugin attempting to use WTP to help
ppl write Service Based web apps. Why am I asking a question on the
geronimo user group? Well because I am attempting to use Apache Geronimo as
the primary J2EE container.
My problem is this, I need to be able to
17 matches
Mail list logo