RE: Upgrading 1.1 EAR to 2.1 - OpenEJB 3 CMP/CMR Issues

2008-12-06 Thread Mark Aufdencamp
particular individual to pick the thread up there? Mark Original Message Subject: Re: Upgrading 1.1 EAR to 2.1 - OpenEJB 3 CMP/CMR Issues From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, December 05, 2008 1:20 pm To: user@geronimo.apache.org On Dec 5, 2008, at 9:35 AM, Mark

RE: Upgrading 1.1 EAR to 2.1 - OpenEJB 3 CMP/CMR Issues

2008-12-05 Thread Mark Aufdencamp
and was incorporated in the TCK for EJB3. Hopefully this is as simple as some SQL dialect issues! Mark Original Message Subject: Re: Upgrading 1.1 EAR to 2.1 - OpenEJB 3 CMP/CMR Issues From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, December 05, 2008 2:47 am To: user

Re: Upgrading 1.1 EAR to 2.1 - OpenEJB 3 CMP/CMR Issues

2008-12-05 Thread David Jencks
to 2.1 - OpenEJB 3 CMP/CMR Issues From: David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, December 05, 2008 2:47 am To: user@geronimo.apache.org Hi Mark, Unfortunately I don't actually know what I'm talking about here in any detail Dain would know more. However I have a few suggestions: 1. We

Upgrading 1.1 EAR to 2.1 - OpenEJB 3 CMP/CMR Issues

2008-12-04 Thread Mark Aufdencamp
Hi All, I'm upgrading an EAR from G 1.1.1-Win32-Tomcat to G 2.1.3-Linux-Tomcat. I've successfully installed G 2.1 and managed to deploy my Database Pools and Security Realms. I've edited my geonimo-application.xml and openejb-jar.xml to reflect the new deployment plan name space. I've managed

Re: Upgrading 1.1 EAR to 2.1 - OpenEJB 3 CMP/CMR Issues

2008-12-04 Thread David Jencks
Hi Mark, Unfortunately I don't actually know what I'm talking about here in any detail Dain would know more. However I have a few suggestions: 1. We set the following properties in persistence.xml by default: if you want something different you should override them: