Re: deploying minimal web app

2005-04-02 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Scott Anderson wrote: I was not as clear as I could have been. I was referring to a problem Tomcat was having preserving portlet application sessions so that portlets within the same portlet application could share data and find the right application context. This problem was related to Tomcat not

Re: deploying minimal web app

2005-04-01 Thread Jeremy Boynes
Scott Anderson wrote: I built a minimal war and ran into deployment issues with both Jetty and Tomcat... Jetty - In my first attempt I noticed that Jetty was ignoring the context name I had specified in META-INF/context.xml and used the name of the war file instead. I don't think we support

Re: deploying minimal web app

2005-04-01 Thread toby cabot
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 02:46:32PM -0800, Scott Anderson wrote: Deployment failed Server reports: No deployer present in kernel I use the distribute command to deploy my application and get this error if there's an instance of Geronimo running when I run the deployer. Not sure whether it

deploying minimal web app

2005-04-01 Thread Scott Anderson
David Jencks wrote: In my first attempt I noticed that Jetty was ignoring the context name I had specified in META-INF/context.xml and used the name of the war file instead. We ignore all jetty-specific deployment info. It turns out that this is a Tomcat specific mechanism for specifying

Re: deploying minimal web app

2005-04-01 Thread David Jencks
On Apr 1, 2005, at 10:33 AM, Scott Anderson wrote: David Jencks wrote: In my first attempt I noticed that Jetty was ignoring the context name I had specified in META-INF/context.xml and used the name of the war file instead. We ignore all jetty-specific deployment info. It turns out that this is a