Re: reconciling geronimo common libs and standalone maven2 repository

t system soon but might still be worth looking at. I think I'd recommend you go for a plugin. Hope this helps, perhaps I'll understand better exactly what you want to do with your next reply. thanks david jencks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/reconciling- g

Re: reconciling geronimo common libs and standalone maven2 repository

> geronimo plan: that's why the plans in our configs dir don't have an > environment element in them. This is slightly problematical due to > the different meanings of "scope" in maven and geronimo and we might > adopt a different system soo

Re: reconciling geronimo common libs and standalone maven2 repository

ill be worth looking at. I think I'd recommend you go for a plugin. Hope this helps, perhaps I'll understand better exactly what you want to do with your next reply. thanks david jencks -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/reconciling- geronimo-common-libs-an

reconciling geronimo common libs and standalone maven2 repository

aller files to the server, relying on common libs to supply the needed jars. Is this possible? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/reconciling-geronimo-common-libs-and-standalone-maven2-repository-tf3411000s134.html#a9503712 Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.