Re: Counter limit

2013-09-09 Thread Christian Krause
I changed the property name to mapred.job.counters.limit and restarted it again. Now it works. Thanks, Christian 2013/9/7 Claudio Martella claudio.marte...@gmail.com did you restart TT and JT? On Sat, Sep 7, 2013 at 7:09 AM, Christian Krause m...@ckrause.org wrote: Hi, I've increased

Re: Counter limit

2013-09-09 Thread Christian Krause
Sorry, it still doesn't work (I ran into a different problem before I reached the limit). I am using Hadoop 0.20.203.0. Is the limit of 120 counters maybe hardcoded? Cheers Christian Am 09.09.2013 08:29 schrieb Christian Krause m...@ckrause.org: I changed the property name to

Re: Counter limit

2013-09-09 Thread Avery Ching
If you are running out of counters, you can turn off the superstep counters /** Use superstep counters? (boolean) */ BooleanConfOption USE_SUPERSTEP_COUNTERS = new BooleanConfOption(giraph.useSuperstepCounters, true, Use superstep counters? (boolean)); On 9/9/13 6:43 AM,

Re: Out of core execution has no effect on GC crash

2013-09-09 Thread Alexander Asplund
Thanks for the reply. I tried setting giraph.maxPartitionsInMemory to 1, but I'm still getting OOM: GC limit exceeded. Are there any particular cases the OOC will not be able to handle, or is it supposed to work in all cases? If the latter, it might be that I have made some configuration error.

Re: Out of core execution has no effect on GC crash

2013-09-09 Thread Claudio Martella
did you extend the heap available to the mapper tasks? e.g. through mapred.child.java.opts. On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Alexander Asplund alexaspl...@gmail.comwrote: Thanks for the reply. I tried setting giraph.maxPartitionsInMemory to 1, but I'm still getting OOM: GC limit exceeded.

Re: Out of core execution has no effect on GC crash

2013-09-09 Thread Alexander Asplund
Really appreciate the swift responses! Thanks again. I have not both increased mapper tasks and decreased max number of partitions at the same time. I first did tests with increased Mapper heap available, but reset the setting after it apparently caused other, large volume, non-Giraph jobs to

Re: Out of core execution has no effect on GC crash

2013-09-09 Thread Alexander Asplund
A small note: I'm not seeing any partitions directory being formed under _bsp, which is where I have understood that they should be appearing. On 9/10/13, Alexander Asplund alexaspl...@gmail.com wrote: Really appreciate the swift responses! Thanks again. I have not both increased mapper tasks

Re: Out of core execution has no effect on GC crash

2013-09-09 Thread David Boyd
Alexander: You might try turning off the GC Overhead limit (-XX:-UseGCOverheadLimit) Also you could turn on verbose GC logging (-verbose:gc -Xloggc:/tmp/@taskid@.gc) to see what is happening. Because the OOC still has to create and destroy objects I suspect that the heap is just getting