However, I think the behavior described above is not
correct. If there is some other cause for the behavior I'm seeing please let
me know.
Thanks,
Nick
On Aug 21, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Nick West wrote:
Thank you both for the replies.
I have checked out the most recent version of the code and am
code, but you can give it a try
and see if it solves your issue.
Regards,
Kaushik
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Nick West
mailto:nick.w...@benchmarksolutions.com>>
wrote:
I'm a little confused by the examples in SimpleMasterComputeVertex.java.
To me it looks like this is a
rds,
Kaushik
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Nick West
mailto:nick.w...@benchmarksolutions.com>>
wrote:
Hi,
I have a giraph application that runs fine; however, when I add a MasterCompute
object (definition following) all of the map tasks time out. I have hadoop
configured to run with 8 m
p and vote to halt ...
agg.aggregate(stop)
}
}
Is there some other method that I am not calling that I should? Or some step
that I'm missing? Any suggestions as to why/how these additions are causing
the processes to block would be appreciated!
Thanks,
Nick West
Benchmark Solutions
ighbors is invoked, it
can read the state of its direct neighbors.
I think that the Pregel model is simply not suited for such algorithms
(unfortunately), let me know if you find a clever workaround.
Best,
Sebastian
2012/8/3 Nick West
mailto:nick.w...@benchmarksolutions.com>>
Thanks for the
never received any messages after then, in which case they are
never reactivated.
In other words, I think you can rephrase that as:
1. All vertices are halted after a given superstep
2. No messages were sent in that superstep
Hope it helps.
Alessandro
From: Nick West
mailto:n
e two conditions
must both hold for the global BSP algorithm to terminate:
1) All vertices vote to halt in a given superstep
2) No messages are sent in that supersetp
Is that correct?
Thanks,
Nick West
Benchmark Solutions
101 Park Avenue - 7th Floor
New York, NY 10178
Tel +1.212.220.4739 | M
essandro Presta wrote:
Hi Nick,
Thanks for pointing this out.
Here's a relevant discussion that was just recently started:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-272.
Hopefully we get this sorted out soon.
Alessandro
From: Nick West
mailto:nick.w...@benchmarksolutions.com>>
Reply-T
s are declared final, limiting the
amount of customization one can make to these classes.
If you have any alternative suggestions, I'd be happy to hear them.
Thanks,
Nick West
Benchmark Solutions
101 Park Avenue - 7th Floor
New York, NY 10178
Tel +1.212.220.4739 | Mobile +1.64
I am guessing it is because Giraph needs to move vertices around and needs to
construct them before it reads in their serialization. I am new to Giraph
myself so this may be incorrect. Maybe Avery could comment.
Jon
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Nick West
mailto:nick.w...@benchmarksolution
both
behaviours for you? Same for edge and message classes. This should be enough do
what you want.
Jon
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Nick West
mailto:nick.w...@benchmarksolutions.com>>
wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on implementing a belief propagation algorithm over Giraph. (Do
yo
lection - could that
be a cause?
Thanks,
Nick West
Stack Trace:
./bin/hadoop jar
~/code/watchdog/modules/inference/target/inference-assembly-1.0.jar
bmrk.inference.giraph.IdiotRunner ising ising_out 4
Input arguments:
[0] = ising
[1] = ising_out
[2] = 4
setting
12 matches
Mail list logo